19.01.2015 Views

Statistics for Decision- Making in Business - Maricopa Community ...

Statistics for Decision- Making in Business - Maricopa Community ...

Statistics for Decision- Making in Business - Maricopa Community ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Independence Property<br />

Given two events, and , if ( ) ( ), then does not depend on , and so the<br />

dependence <strong>for</strong>mula reduces to:<br />

( ) ( ) ( )<br />

( ) ( ) ( )<br />

This result is important, because it allows you to only have to remember the “and” rule <strong>for</strong><br />

dependent events. If the next event does not depend on the prior event, then the end probability is<br />

just a product of the two <strong>in</strong>dividual probabilities.<br />

Though the ideas presented above might at first seem confus<strong>in</strong>g, you‟ll notice that the idea of<br />

jo<strong>in</strong>t probabilities has not changed. The only new caution is to take care to acknowledge whether<br />

the events are <strong>in</strong>dependent or not. We‟ll consider a few more examples below.<br />

Example 5: The probability that a resistor and capacitor both fail <strong>in</strong> a portable electronic<br />

device <strong>in</strong> the fifth year of use is 0.95%. The probability that the resistor fails is 1.22% and the<br />

probability that the capacitor fails is 1%. Are the events <strong>in</strong>dependent If they are not<br />

<strong>in</strong>dependent, what is the probability that the capacitor fails given that the resistor fails<br />

SOLUTION:<br />

Let<br />

If the two events are <strong>in</strong>dependent, then the product of unconditional probabilities should give us<br />

the provided jo<strong>in</strong>t probability.<br />

We have that,<br />

( )<br />

( )<br />

If they are <strong>in</strong>dependent events, then<br />

( )<br />

However, the jo<strong>in</strong>t probability under <strong>in</strong>dependence is 0.0122%, not 0.95%.<br />

Thus,<br />

( ) ( ) ( )<br />

<strong>Statistics</strong> <strong>for</strong> <strong>Decision</strong>-<strong>Mak<strong>in</strong>g</strong> <strong>in</strong> Bus<strong>in</strong>ess © Milos Podmanik Page 112

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!