19.01.2015 Views

Statistics for Decision- Making in Business - Maricopa Community ...

Statistics for Decision- Making in Business - Maricopa Community ...

Statistics for Decision- Making in Business - Maricopa Community ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

SOLUTION:<br />

d. A generic conclusion statement<br />

a.) Under the null hypothesis, . We want to test to see if . Thus:<br />

b.) We will reject if the probability of observ<strong>in</strong>g someth<strong>in</strong>g as or more extreme as 15 out of<br />

60 dropouts ( ) under the assumption of the null hypothesis is less than or equal to<br />

0.05. That is:<br />

( )<br />

c.) We will reject if the observed value of is smaller than some cutoff value of . That<br />

is, it might be the case that would have to be smaller than, say, 13 <strong>in</strong> order <strong>for</strong> us to<br />

reject the null hypothesis.<br />

d.) Based on sample evidence, we (choose from below)<br />

a. Reject <strong>in</strong> favor of<br />

b. Fail to reject . We do not accept as true, but we don‟t have evidence to<br />

conclude otherwise.<br />

As we see from the above example, our hypothesis test needs to have a structured layout. We<br />

need to know ahead of time what we‟ll do.<br />

It is tempt<strong>in</strong>g, but we cannot determ<strong>in</strong>e our rejection criterion based on what the sample data<br />

tells us! In practice, you can carry this type of philosophy, but you <strong>in</strong>crease the error rate.<br />

Consider, <strong>for</strong> example, the scenario where<strong>in</strong> you take an exam <strong>for</strong> a biology class. You get the<br />

results back and look at what you missed. You say, “oh, of course I should have put that! I knew<br />

that!” If you told that to the <strong>in</strong>structor, she may say, “sorry, you didn‟t demonstrate that on the<br />

exam.” Without surprise, we expect this response. Why Because, it is the test that helps to<br />

determ<strong>in</strong>e our level of understand<strong>in</strong>g! It is not the other way around. If the <strong>in</strong>structor allowed<br />

you to change your answer, then the test wouldn‟t really be demonstrat<strong>in</strong>g what you knew at that<br />

time of the test. A hypothesis test is quite analogous. We carry one out because we have a hunch.<br />

Always th<strong>in</strong>k back to this statement:<br />

If you dig long enough <strong>in</strong> your data, you will f<strong>in</strong>d someth<strong>in</strong>g!<br />

This, however, looks upon the digg<strong>in</strong>g process as a negative th<strong>in</strong>g s<strong>in</strong>ce it does not justify the<br />

decision questions. In fact, it creates a high likelihood that we are observ<strong>in</strong>g a co<strong>in</strong>cidence and<br />

not a solid f<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>g at all! Thus, we <strong>in</strong>crease the probability of error exponentially!<br />

<strong>Statistics</strong> <strong>for</strong> <strong>Decision</strong>-<strong>Mak<strong>in</strong>g</strong> <strong>in</strong> Bus<strong>in</strong>ess © Milos Podmanik Page 217

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!