01.02.2015 Views

Producer Price Index Manual: Theory and Practice ... - METAC

Producer Price Index Manual: Theory and Practice ... - METAC

Producer Price Index Manual: Theory and Practice ... - METAC

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

7. Treatment of Quality Change<br />

user value <strong>and</strong> resource cost, both supply <strong>and</strong> dem<strong>and</strong><br />

influences. There is, in econometrics terms,<br />

an identification problem, in which the observed<br />

data do not permit the estimation of the underlying<br />

dem<strong>and</strong> <strong>and</strong> supply parameters. However, suppose<br />

the production technology of sellers is the same<br />

but buyers differ. Then the hedonic function describes<br />

the prices of characteristics the firm will<br />

supply with the given ruling technology to the current<br />

mixture of tastes. There are different tastes on<br />

the consumer side, so what appears in the market is<br />

the result of firms trying to satisfy consumer preferences<br />

all for a constant technology <strong>and</strong> profit<br />

level; the structure of supply is revealed by the hedonic<br />

price function. Now suppose sellers differ<br />

but buyers’ tastes are the same. Here the hedonic<br />

function p(z) identifies the structure of dem<strong>and</strong>. Of<br />

these possibilities, uniformity of tastes is unlikely<br />

while uniformity of technologies is more likely,<br />

especially when access to technology is unrestricted<br />

in the long run. Griliches (1988, p. 120)<br />

has argued in the context of a CPI:<br />

My own view is that what the hedonic approach<br />

tries to do is to estimate aspects of the budget<br />

constraint facing consumers, allowing thereby<br />

the estimation of “missing” prices when quality<br />

changes. It is not in the business of estimating<br />

utility functions per se, though it can also be useful<br />

for these purposes….what is being estimated<br />

is the actual locus of intersection of the dem<strong>and</strong><br />

curves of different consumers with varying tastes<br />

<strong>and</strong> the supply curves of different producers with<br />

possible varying technologies of production. One<br />

is unlikely, therefore to be able to recover the<br />

underlying utility <strong>and</strong> cost functions from such<br />

data alone, except in very special circumstances.<br />

It is thus necessary to take a pragmatic stance. In<br />

many cases, the implicit quality adjustment to<br />

prices outlined in Section C may be inappropriate<br />

because their implicit assumptions are unlikely to<br />

be valid. The practical needs of economic statistics<br />

require in such instances explicit quality adjustments.<br />

To not do anything on the grounds that the<br />

measures are not conceptually appropriate would<br />

be to ignore the quality change <strong>and</strong> provide wrong<br />

results. Hedonic techniques provide an important<br />

tool, making effective use of data on the pricequality<br />

relationship derived from other products in<br />

the market to adjustment for changes in one or<br />

more characteristics.<br />

7.137 The proper use of hedonic regression requires<br />

an examination of the coefficients of the estimated<br />

equations to see if they make sense. It<br />

might be argued that the very multitude of distributions<br />

of tastes <strong>and</strong> technologies <strong>and</strong> interplay of<br />

supply <strong>and</strong> dem<strong>and</strong> make it unlikely that reasonable<br />

estimates will arise from such regressions. A<br />

firm may apply <strong>and</strong> cut a profit margin <strong>and</strong> prices<br />

for reasons related to long-run strategic plans, for<br />

example, yielding prima facie coefficients that do<br />

not prima facie look reasonable. This does not negate<br />

the usefulness of examining hedonic coefficients<br />

as part of a strategy for evaluating estimated<br />

hedonic equations. First, there has been extensive<br />

empirical work in this field, <strong>and</strong> the results for individual<br />

coefficients are, for the most part, quite<br />

reasonable. Even over time, individual coefficients<br />

can show quite sensible patterns of decline (van<br />

Mulligen, 2003). Second, as shall be seen, it might<br />

be argued that the prediction <strong>and</strong> its error should<br />

be our concern <strong>and</strong> not the values of individual coefficients<br />

(Pakes, 2001).<br />

E.4.3 Implementation<br />

7.138 The implementation of hedonic methods<br />

to estimate quality adjustments to noncomparable<br />

replacements can take a number of forms. The first<br />

form is when the repricing is for a product with<br />

different characteristics. What is required is to adjust<br />

either the price of the old or replacement<br />

(new) product for some valuation of the difference<br />

in quality between the two products. This patching<br />

of missing prices is quite different from the use of<br />

hedonic price indices to be discussed in Section<br />

7.G <strong>and</strong> Chapter 21. These use hedonic regressions<br />

to provide hedonic price indices of overall qualityadjusted<br />

prices. The former is a partial application,<br />

used on noncomparable replacements when products<br />

are no longer produced. The latter, as will be<br />

seen in Section 7.G, is a general application to a<br />

sample from the whole data set. The partial patching<br />

is considered here.<br />

7.139 Hedonic imputation: predicted vs. actual—In<br />

this approach, a hedonic regression of the<br />

(natural logarithm of the) price of model i in period<br />

t on its characteristics set z t ki<br />

is estimated for<br />

each month, as given by:<br />

t t t t t<br />

(7.24) ln pi = β<br />

0<br />

+ ∑ β<br />

k<br />

zki + εk<br />

.<br />

K<br />

k = 1<br />

175

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!