01.02.2015 Views

Producer Price Index Manual: Theory and Practice ... - METAC

Producer Price Index Manual: Theory and Practice ... - METAC

Producer Price Index Manual: Theory and Practice ... - METAC

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

1. An Introduction to PPI Methodology<br />

that is when b = 0, the Laspeyres index is obtained,<br />

<strong>and</strong> when quantities are those of the second period,<br />

that is when b = t,—the Paasche index is obtained.<br />

It is necessary to consider the properties of<br />

Laspeyres <strong>and</strong> Paasche indices, <strong>and</strong> also the<br />

relationships between them, in more detail.<br />

1.25 The formula for the Laspeyres price index,<br />

P L , is given in equation (1.2).<br />

n<br />

t 0<br />

∑ pq<br />

i i n<br />

i=<br />

1<br />

t<br />

(1.2) = ≡<br />

n ∑( )<br />

0 0 i=<br />

1<br />

∑ pq<br />

i i<br />

P p p s<br />

0 0<br />

L i i i<br />

i=<br />

1<br />

where s 0<br />

i denotes the share of the value of product<br />

i in the total output of goods <strong>and</strong> services in period<br />

0 0 0 0<br />

0: that is, pi qi / ∑ pi qi<br />

.<br />

1.26 As can be seen from equation (1.2), <strong>and</strong> as<br />

explained in more detail in Chapter 15, the<br />

Laspeyres index can be expressed in two alternative<br />

ways that are algebraically identical: first, as the ratio<br />

of the values of the basket of producer goods<br />

<strong>and</strong> services produced in period 0 when valued at<br />

the prices of periods t <strong>and</strong> 0 respectively; second, as<br />

a weighted arithmetic average of the ratios of the<br />

individual prices in periods t <strong>and</strong> 0 using the value<br />

shares in period 0 as weights. The individual price<br />

ratios, (p i t /p i 0 ), are described as price relatives. Statistical<br />

offices often calculate PPIs using the second<br />

formula by recording the percentage changes in the<br />

prices of producer goods <strong>and</strong> services sold <strong>and</strong><br />

weighting them by the total value of output in the<br />

base period 0.<br />

1.27 The formula for the Paasche index, P P , is<br />

given in equation (1.3).<br />

n<br />

t t<br />

∑ pq<br />

i i n<br />

i=<br />

1 ⎧ t 0<br />

(1.3)<br />

n ∑( )<br />

0 t i=<br />

1<br />

pq ⎩<br />

∑ i i<br />

−1<br />

t⎫<br />

P = ≡⎨ pi pi si<br />

⎬<br />

⎭<br />

i=<br />

1<br />

t<br />

where s i denotes the actual share of the expenditure<br />

on commodity i in period t: that is, p t i q t i /<br />

∑ p t i q t i . The Paasche index can also be expressed in<br />

two alternative ways, either as the ratio of two<br />

value aggregates or as a weighted average of the<br />

price relatives, the average being a harmonic average<br />

that uses the revenue shares of the later period t<br />

,<br />

−1<br />

,<br />

as weights. However, it follows from equation (1.1)<br />

that the Paasche index can also be expressed as a<br />

weighted arithmetic average of the price relatives<br />

using hybrid expenditure weights in which the<br />

quantities of t are valued at the prices of 0.<br />

1.28 If the objective is simply to measure the<br />

price change between the two periods considered in<br />

isolation, there is no reason to prefer the basket of<br />

the earlier period to that of the later period, or vice<br />

versa. Both baskets are equally relevant. Both indices<br />

are equally justifiable, or acceptable, from a<br />

conceptual point of view. In practice, however,<br />

PPIs are calculated for a succession of time periods.<br />

A time series of monthly Laspeyres PPIs based on<br />

period 0 benefits from requiring only a single set of<br />

quantities (or revenues), those of period 0, so that<br />

only the prices have to be collected on a regular<br />

monthly basis. A time series of Paasche PPIs, on<br />

the other h<strong>and</strong>, requires data on both prices <strong>and</strong><br />

quantities (or revenues) in each successive period.<br />

Thus, it is much less costly, <strong>and</strong> time consuming, to<br />

calculate a time series of Laspeyres indices than a<br />

time series of Paasche indices. This is a decisive<br />

practical advantage of Laspeyres (as well as Lowe)<br />

indices over Paasche indices <strong>and</strong> explains why<br />

Laspeyres <strong>and</strong> Lowe indices are used much more<br />

extensively than Paasche indices. A monthly<br />

Laspeyres or Lowe PPI can be published as soon as<br />

the price information has been collected <strong>and</strong> processed,<br />

since the base period weights are already<br />

available.<br />

B.1.3 Decomposing current value<br />

changes using Laspeyres <strong>and</strong><br />

Paasche<br />

1.29 Laspeyres <strong>and</strong> Paasche quantity indices are<br />

defined in a similar way to the price indices, simply<br />

by interchanging the ps <strong>and</strong> qs in formulas (1.2) <strong>and</strong><br />

(1.3). They summarize changes over time in the<br />

flow of quantities of goods <strong>and</strong> services produced.<br />

A Laspeyres quantity index values the quantities at<br />

the fixed prices of the earlier period, while the<br />

Paasche quantity index uses the prices of the later<br />

period. The ratio of the values of the revenues in<br />

two periods (V) reflects the combined effects of<br />

both price <strong>and</strong> quantity changes. When Laspeyres<br />

<strong>and</strong> Paasche indices are used, the value change can<br />

be exactly decomposed into a price index times a<br />

quantity index only if the Laspeyres price (quantity)<br />

index is matched with the Paasche quantity (price)<br />

index. Let P L <strong>and</strong> Q L denote the Laspeyres price<br />

7

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!