01.02.2015 Views

Producer Price Index Manual: Theory and Practice ... - METAC

Producer Price Index Manual: Theory and Practice ... - METAC

Producer Price Index Manual: Theory and Practice ... - METAC

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>Producer</strong> <strong>Price</strong> <strong>Index</strong> <strong>Manual</strong><br />

qvist indices are equally good alternatives. Indeed,<br />

the Fisher may be preferred to the Walsh on axiomatic<br />

grounds, given that the two indices will tend<br />

to give almost identical results for comparisons between<br />

successive time periods.<br />

1.130 As already noted, for practical reasons the<br />

PPI is often calculated as a time series of Laspeyres<br />

indices based on some earlier period 0. In this case,<br />

the published index between t – 1 <strong>and</strong> t may actually<br />

be the monthly change version of the Laspeyres<br />

index given in equation (1.4) above. Given that<br />

some substitution effect is operative, which seems<br />

extremely likely on both theoretic <strong>and</strong> empirical<br />

grounds, it may be inferred, by reasoning along<br />

lines explained in Chapter 15, that the monthlychange<br />

Laspeyres index will tend to be less than the<br />

Walsh index between t – 1 <strong>and</strong> t. If the PPI is intended<br />

to measure producer inflation, therefore, the<br />

monthly change Laspeyres could have a downward<br />

bias, a bias that will tend to get worse as the current<br />

period for the Laspeyres index moves further away<br />

from the base period. This is the kind of conclusion<br />

that emerges from the index theory presented in<br />

Chapters 15 <strong>and</strong> 16. It is a conclusion with considerable<br />

policy <strong>and</strong> financial implications. It also has<br />

practical implications because it provides an argument<br />

for rebasing <strong>and</strong> updating a Laspeyres index<br />

as often as resources permit, perhaps on an annual<br />

basis as many countries are now doing.<br />

1.131 If the objective of the PPI is to measure the<br />

current rate of change in revenues for a fixed, given<br />

technology <strong>and</strong> set of inputs, to be used for output<br />

deflation, this translates into asking what is the best<br />

estimate of the change in producer output prices.<br />

The theory elaborated in Chapter 17 shows that the<br />

best estimate will be provided by a superlative index.<br />

The three commonly used superlative indices<br />

are Fisher, Törnqvist, <strong>and</strong> Walsh. One or the other<br />

of these indices emerges as the theoretically most<br />

appropriate formula, whether the objective is to<br />

measure the current rate of factory gate inflation or<br />

as a deflator. A monthly-change Laspeyres is likely<br />

to have the same bias whatever the objective.<br />

1.132 If the objective were to measure price<br />

changes over long periods of time—say, 10 or 20<br />

years—the main issue for long-term comparisons is<br />

whether to chain or not, or at least how frequently<br />

to link.<br />

I. Elementary <strong>Price</strong> Indices<br />

1.133 As explained in Chapters 9 <strong>and</strong> 20, the calculation<br />

of a PPI typically proceeds in two or more<br />

stages. In the first stage, elementary price indices<br />

are estimated for the elementary aggregates of a<br />

PPI. In the second stage, these elementary indices<br />

are combined to obtain higher-level indices using<br />

the elementary aggregate indices with revenue<br />

weights. An elementary aggregate consists of the<br />

revenue for a small <strong>and</strong> relatively homogeneous set<br />

of products defined within the industrial classification<br />

used in the PPI. Samples of prices are collected<br />

within each elementary aggregate, so that elementary<br />

aggregates serve as strata for sampling purposes.<br />

1.134 Data on the revenues, or quantities, of the<br />

different goods <strong>and</strong> services may not be available<br />

within an elementary aggregate. Since it has been<br />

shown that it is theoretically appropriate to use superlative<br />

formulas, data on revenues should be collected<br />

alongside those on prices whenever possible.<br />

Given that this may not possible, that there are no<br />

quantity or revenue weights, most of the index<br />

number theory outlined in the previous sections is<br />

not applicable. An elementary price index is a more<br />

primitive concept that relies on price data only. It is<br />

something calculated when there is no explicit or<br />

implicit quantity or revenue data available for<br />

weights. Implicit quantity or revenue data may arise<br />

from a sampling design whereby the selection of<br />

products is with probability proportionate to quantities<br />

or sales revenue.<br />

1.135 The question of what is the most appropriate<br />

formula to use to estimate an elementary price<br />

index is considered in Chapter 20. This topic was<br />

comparatively neglected until a number of papers in<br />

the 1990s provided much clearer insights into the<br />

properties of elementary indices <strong>and</strong> their relative<br />

strengths <strong>and</strong> weaknesses. Since the elementary indices<br />

are the building blocks from which PPIs are<br />

constructed, the quality of a PPI depends heavily on<br />

them.<br />

1.136 As explained in Chapter 6, compilers have<br />

to select representative products within an elementary<br />

aggregate <strong>and</strong> then collect a sample of prices<br />

for each of the representative products, usually<br />

from a sample of different establishments. The individual<br />

products whose prices are actually collected<br />

are described as the sampled products. Their<br />

26

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!