01.02.2015 Views

Producer Price Index Manual: Theory and Practice ... - METAC

Producer Price Index Manual: Theory and Practice ... - METAC

Producer Price Index Manual: Theory and Practice ... - METAC

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

1. An Introduction to PPI Methodology<br />

prices are collected over a succession of time periods.<br />

An elementary price index is therefore typically<br />

calculated from two sets of matched price observations.<br />

It is assumed in this Section that there<br />

are no missing observations <strong>and</strong> no changes in the<br />

quality of the products sampled, so that the two sets<br />

of prices are perfectly matched. The treatment of<br />

new <strong>and</strong> disappearing products, <strong>and</strong> of quality<br />

change, is a separate <strong>and</strong> complex issue that is discussed<br />

in detail in Chapters 7, 8, <strong>and</strong> 21 of the<br />

<strong>Manual</strong>.<br />

I.1 Heterogeneity of products within<br />

an elementary aggregate<br />

1.137 If a number of different representative<br />

products are selected for pricing, the set of products<br />

within an elementary aggregate cannot be homogeneous.<br />

Even a single representative product may not<br />

be completely homogeneous, depending upon how<br />

tightly it is specified. This topic is considered in<br />

more detail in Chapters 5–7. The degree of heterogeneity<br />

of the sampled products must be explicitly<br />

taken into account in the calculation of an elementary<br />

index.<br />

1.138 When the quantities are not homogeneous,<br />

they cannot be meaningfully added from an economic<br />

viewpoint, <strong>and</strong> their prices should not be averaged.<br />

Consider again the example of salt <strong>and</strong><br />

pepper, which might be representative products<br />

within an elementary aggregate. Pepper is an expensive<br />

spice sold in very small quantities such as<br />

ounces or grams, whereas salt is relatively cheap<br />

<strong>and</strong> sold in much larger quantities, such as pounds<br />

or kilos. A simple arithmetic average of, say, the<br />

price of a gram of pepper <strong>and</strong> the price of a kilo of<br />

salt is an arbitrary statistic whose value depends<br />

largely on the choice of the quantity units. Choosing<br />

the same physical unit of quantity, such as a<br />

kilo, for both does not resolve the problem, because<br />

both the average price <strong>and</strong> the change in the average<br />

price would be completely dominated by the<br />

more expensive product, pepper, even though producers<br />

may obtain more revenue from salt. In general,<br />

arithmetic averages of prices should be taken<br />

only when the corresponding quantities are homogeneous<br />

<strong>and</strong> can be meaningfully added.<br />

I.2 Weighting<br />

1.139 As already noted, it is assumed in this section<br />

that there are no quantities or revenues available<br />

to weight the prices, or the price relatives, used<br />

to calculate an elementary index. If they were available,<br />

it would usually be preferable to use them to<br />

decompose the elementary aggregate into smaller<br />

<strong>and</strong> more homogeneous aggregates.<br />

1.140 However, some system of weighting may<br />

have been implicitly introduced into the selection of<br />

the sampled products by the sample design used.<br />

For example, the establishments from which the<br />

prices are collected may have been selected using<br />

probabilities of selection that are proportional to<br />

their sales or some other variable.<br />

I.3 Interrelationships between different<br />

elementary index formulas<br />

1.141 Valuable insights into the properties of<br />

various formulas that might be used for elementary<br />

price indices may be gained by examining the numerical<br />

relationships between them, as explained in<br />

Section D of Chapter 20. There are two basic options<br />

for an elementary index:<br />

• To average the price relatives—that is, the ratios<br />

of the matched prices;<br />

• To calculate the ratio of average prices in each<br />

period.<br />

1.142 It is worth recalling that for any set of positive<br />

numbers the arithmetic average is greater than<br />

or equal to the geometric average, which in turn is<br />

greater than or equal to the harmonic average, the<br />

equalities holding only when the numbers are all<br />

equal. Using these three types of average, the ranking<br />

of the results obtained by the second method are<br />

predictable. It should also be noted that the ratio of<br />

geometric averages is identical with the geometric<br />

average of the ratios. The two methods give the<br />

same results when geometric averages are used.<br />

1.143 As explained in Section C of Chapter 20,<br />

there are several elementary price indices that might<br />

possibly be used. Using the first of the above options,<br />

three possible elementary price indices are:<br />

• The arithmetic average of the price relatives,<br />

known as the Carli index, or P C ; the Carli is the<br />

unweighted version of the Young index.<br />

• The geometric average of the price relatives,<br />

known as the Jevons index, or P J ; the Jevons is<br />

the unweighted version of the geometric Young<br />

index.<br />

27

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!