01.02.2015 Views

Producer Price Index Manual: Theory and Practice ... - METAC

Producer Price Index Manual: Theory and Practice ... - METAC

Producer Price Index Manual: Theory and Practice ... - METAC

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

1. An Introduction to PPI Methodology<br />

derlying unknown theoretical PPI—<strong>and</strong> certainly a<br />

much closer approximation than either the<br />

Laspeyres or the Paasche indices can yield on their<br />

own.<br />

1.103 This intuition is corroborated by the following<br />

line of reasoning. Diewert (1976) noted that<br />

a homogeneous quadratic is a flexible functional<br />

form that can provide a second-order approximation<br />

to other twice-differentiable functions around the<br />

same point. He then described an index number<br />

formula that is exactly equal to a theoretical one<br />

based on the underlying aggregator function as superlative<br />

when that functional form is also flexible—for<br />

example, a homogeneous quadratic. The<br />

derivation of these results, <strong>and</strong> further explanation,<br />

are given in detail in Section B.3 of Chapter 17. In<br />

contrast to the theoretical index itself, a superlative<br />

index is an actual index number that can be calculated.<br />

The practical significance of these results is<br />

that they provide a theoretical justification for expecting<br />

a superlative index to provide a fairly close<br />

approximation to the unknown underlying theoretical<br />

index in a wide range of circumstances.<br />

E.3.1 Superlative indices as symmetric<br />

indices<br />

1.104 The Fisher index is not the only example of<br />

a superlative index. In fact, there is a whole family<br />

of superlative indices. It is shown in Section B.4 of<br />

Chapter 17 that any quadratic mean of order r is a<br />

superlative index for each value of r ≠ 0. A quadratic<br />

mean of order r price index P r is defined as<br />

follows:<br />

(1.15) P<br />

r<br />

≡<br />

n<br />

r<br />

i=<br />

1<br />

r<br />

∑<br />

n<br />

∑<br />

i=<br />

1<br />

t<br />

0<br />

⎛ p ⎞<br />

i<br />

si<br />

⎜ 0 ⎟<br />

⎝ pi<br />

⎠<br />

0<br />

t<br />

⎛ p ⎞<br />

i<br />

si<br />

⎜ t ⎟<br />

⎝ pi<br />

⎠<br />

r 2<br />

r 2<br />

where s i 0 <strong>and</strong> s i<br />

t<br />

are defined as in equation (1.2)<br />

above.<br />

1.105 The symmetry of the numerator <strong>and</strong> denominator<br />

of equation (1.11) should be noted. A<br />

distinctive feature of equation (1.11) is that it treats<br />

the price changes <strong>and</strong> revenue shares in both periods<br />

symmetrically whatever value is assigned to the<br />

parameter r. Three special cases are of interest:<br />

,<br />

• When r = 2, equation (1.1) reduces to the<br />

Fisher price index;<br />

• When r = 1, it is equivalent to the Walsh price<br />

index;<br />

• In the limit as r → 0, it equals the Törnqvist index.<br />

1.106 These indices were introduced earlier as<br />

examples of indices that treat the information available<br />

in both periods symmetrically. Each was originally<br />

proposed long before the concept of a superlative<br />

index was developed.<br />

E.3.2 The choice of superlative index<br />

1.107 Section B.6 of chapter 17 addresses the<br />

question of which superlative formula to choose in<br />

practice. Because each may be expected to approximate<br />

to the same underlying theoretical output<br />

index, it may be inferred that they ought also to approximate<br />

to each other. That they are all symmetric<br />

indices reinforces this conclusion. These conjectures<br />

tend to be borne out in practice by numerical<br />

calculations. It seems that the numerical values of<br />

the different superlative indices tend to be very<br />

close to each other, but only so long as the value of<br />

the parameter r does not lie far outside the range 0<br />

to 2. However, in principle, there is no limit on the<br />

value of the parameter r, <strong>and</strong> in Section B.5.1 of<br />

Chapter 17, it has shown that as the value of r becomes<br />

progressively larger, the formula tends to assign<br />

increasing weight to the extreme price relatives<br />

<strong>and</strong> the resulting superlative indices may diverge<br />

significantly from each other. Only when the absolute<br />

value of r is very small, as in the case of the<br />

three commonly used superlative indices—Fisher,<br />

Walsh, <strong>and</strong> Törnqvist—is the choice of superlative<br />

index unimportant.<br />

1.108 Both the Fisher <strong>and</strong> the Walsh indices date<br />

back nearly a century. The Fisher index owes its<br />

popularity to the axiomatic, or test, approach, which<br />

Fisher (1922) himself was instrumental in developing.<br />

As shown above, it appears to dominate other<br />

indices from an axiomatic viewpoint. That it is also<br />

a superlative index whose use can be justified on<br />

grounds of economic theory suggests that, from a<br />

theoretical point of view, it may be impossible to<br />

improve on the Fisher index for PPI purposes.<br />

1.109 However, the Walsh index has the attraction<br />

of being not merely a superlative index, but<br />

also a conceptually simple pure price index based<br />

21

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!