Eisen-Suppressed-Inventions-and-other-Discoveries-True-Stories-of ...

Introduction 3
cal companies, granting them patent rights for something they had never
even developed. This came after several years of negotiations, at the cost
of thousands of lives.
For every once-revolutionary idea that is now commonplace in our
daily lives, many more have been suppressed or witheld by those vested
interests with a focus on profit or power. Pure self-interest results in
strong opposition from multinational corporations, orthodox science, and
even our own governments when innovation threatens the status quo.
Wealthy and powerful individuals are not inclined to forfeit their fortunes
or their authority, even though the human population as a whole would
benefit greatly from new technologies.
The suppression of innovation and discovery is an overwhelming and
frightening problem. I have put this book together in order to directly
address this critical issue, which I believe deserves our utmost attention.
These collected articles, some of which may surprise or even shock you,
are highly varied, but each and every one is vital to our understanding of
the nature of suppression—where it begins, who it affects, and how it is
perpetuated. Because the suppression syndrome is so far-reaching, I have
grouped the material into four sections, each detailing the struggle of specific
ascendancies to maintain their funds and their jurisdiction.
Section I focuses on the suppression of alternative medicine. Powerful
pharmaceutical companies and their agents, the orthodox medical societies,
are not ready to lose millions of dollars by admitting that there are
nontoxic, inexpensive treatments that are effective in the fight against diseases
such as cancer and AIDS. Therefore, patients suffering from these
and other degenerative illnesses are denied access to possible cures. Many
remain unaware that these therapies even exist until there is little, if any,
hope for recovery.
The efforts of organized science to suppress the independent researcher
are detailed in Section II. Establishment science has yet to examine itself
according to the stringent guidelines of its own Scientific Method, the
doctrine by which all research and discovery is measured. It seems that if
scientists assessed their work objectively, they would find that there is no
monopoly on truth, a realization which could undermine their elevated
status. What a sad commentary on a branch of knowledge whose constituents
should humbly admit that they do not know all the answers—or
even all the questions. How can any "radical" ideas find acceptance in a
system whose aim is self-perpetuation, rather than the betterment of
humanity
In Section III you will discover that the public at large remains shockingly
ignorant as to the extent of our government's involvement with
UFOs and extraterrestrials. What if our highest powers are in fact sub-