Eisen-Suppressed-Inventions-and-other-Discoveries-True-Stories-of ...

The Suppression of Fuel Savers and Alternate Energy Resources 413
After all, the theoretical basis for vacuum energy is now part of the physics
literature:
. . . Not just in the literature of the fringe; it's been in Physical Review
since 1975, Review of Modern Physics since 1962, and in European
physics literature since the early 50s. Harold Puthoff in his May 1987
article in Physical Review D pointed out that in order for the hydrogen
atom in its ground state not to collapse, it had to be absorbing energy
from the vacuum.
The astrophysicist saw this scientific work as further vindication of Tesla.
Trombly said that in the nineteenth century Tesla prophesied that people
would someday hook their machinery up to "the very wheelworks of
nature"—the energy of vacuum space.
Trombly noted that electrons themselves must spontaneously appear
out of the background field of energy, or "we would have to invoke a
rather Neanderthal concept that everything had its start in a certain moment."
The speaker paused as if to let the audience catch his sarcasm, then
added, "because we have embraced this [Big Bang] cosmology for the last
couple of decades, we have some real problems."
In contrast, Trombly said, a more advanced cosmology sees everything
as a modification of an energy-rich background field. Our physical bodies
are relatively insignificant modifications of that field. The field itself has
a potential energy equivalence, in grams, of 10-to-the-94th power grams
per cubic centimetre. The human body, in comparison, has a gram equivalent
of only about one gram per cubic centimeter. That means that the
background energy is 10 (wish 94 zeros after the ten) times more energyrich
than our physical bodies.
THE PLAN: TELL ROOSEVELT
It's a lot of energy, Trombly said. Why not invent a pocket size device
which could tap a kilowatt of this space energy It could "just kind of
scrape the surface, ever so slightly" of the 10-to-the-94th-power grams
per cubic centimeter supply of energy.
"That's what Nikola Tesla was scheduled to tell Franklin Delano
Roosevelt in 1943. In 1943 he proposed to FDR that perhaps we should
look carefully at the fact that we can get all the energy we need from any
space we happen to be in.
"He didn't show up for the meeting; he was found dead in his apartment—
'natural causes.'"
The speaker added quietly that despite the official statement on the
cause of death, then is some suspicion that Tesla's paranoia about what
he ate was more premonition than paranoia. Trombly then related an