10.02.2015 Views

Eisen-Suppressed-Inventions-and-other-Discoveries-True-Stories-of ...

Eisen-Suppressed-Inventions-and-other-Discoveries-True-Stories-of ...

Eisen-Suppressed-Inventions-and-other-Discoveries-True-Stories-of ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

The Suppression <strong>of</strong> UFO Technologies <strong>and</strong> Extraterrestrial Contact 385<br />

tion <strong>of</strong> a telescope, the barely perceptible dynamics <strong>of</strong> heat (wind) movement<br />

in the atmosphere causes a slight shimmering effect, <strong>and</strong> while the<br />

broad features <strong>of</strong> a planetary image may be easily recognizable, any fine<br />

detail is lost in an almost continual slight blurring. Ever so momentarily,<br />

our atmospheric unsteadiness will cease for a second or two. At that precise<br />

moment an astute telescopic observer will have a perfect seeing condition,<br />

<strong>and</strong> be able to see in fine detail the planetary image 35 million<br />

miles away. Yet these views last but a few seconds, making it extremely<br />

difficult to obtain a distinct photograph. Furthermore, the only way that<br />

the photographic evidence <strong>of</strong> the canals can be obtained is when the planet<br />

is viewed directly overhead. These observations must be made from the<br />

best suitable locations in our southern hemisphere.<br />

Lowell made a special expedition to Chile in 1907 <strong>and</strong> obtained the<br />

first photographic evidence <strong>of</strong> the canals. His successor, Dr. E. C. Slipher,<br />

had better success in later years with observations from South Africa,<br />

when camera equipment had improved considerably. The Martian canals<br />

are seen on plates VI <strong>and</strong> XLVII in the book, The Photographic Story <strong>of</strong><br />

Mars, by E. C. Slipher. The edition I obtained was published by Northl<strong>and</strong><br />

Press, Flagstaff, Arizona, in 1962.<br />

The quality <strong>of</strong> photographs can always be debated by the establishment<br />

scientist who denies everything he has not seen for himself. In reality, the<br />

eye is superior in viewing telescopic images in detail, compared to the<br />

photographic results when taking telescopic pictures <strong>of</strong> a planet 35 million<br />

miles distant. Dr. Slipher stated in 1962, "The history <strong>of</strong> the canal<br />

problem shows that every skilled observer who goes to the best available<br />

site for his observations has had no great difficulty <strong>of</strong> seeing <strong>and</strong> convincing<br />

himself <strong>of</strong> the reality <strong>of</strong> the canals. I am not aware <strong>of</strong> a single<br />

exception to this." A fellow astronomer, Dr. Pettit, confirmed this visual<br />

documentation, by reporting in 1953 that "there are moments when the<br />

whole canal pattern can be seen on Mars."<br />

Today's literature never fails to mention that the early Mariner probes<br />

during the 1960's proved that the canals are non-existent, <strong>and</strong> that the controversy<br />

over the Schiaparelli <strong>and</strong> Lowell evidence has been laid to rest.<br />

It is true that no actual evidence <strong>of</strong> canals was released by NASA, but it<br />

should be realized, that if the picture-taking cameras on those early probes<br />

did photograph certain areas showing canals with sufficient clarity, the<br />

evidence would not have been released anyway. The fact is, that until<br />

Mariner 9, only a very small <strong>and</strong> unrepresentative fraction <strong>of</strong> the Martian<br />

surface was photographed, <strong>and</strong> most <strong>of</strong> that, very poorly. Mariners 4, 6,<br />

<strong>and</strong> 7 never even found the huge 2300-mile-long Valles Marineus canyon<br />

on Mars, which is a natural formation. The fuzzy black <strong>and</strong> white photos<br />

that were released to the public lacked any clarity whatsoever. We can get

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!