10.02.2015 Views

Eisen-Suppressed-Inventions-and-other-Discoveries-True-Stories-of ...

Eisen-Suppressed-Inventions-and-other-Discoveries-True-Stories-of ...

Eisen-Suppressed-Inventions-and-other-Discoveries-True-Stories-of ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

The Suppression <strong>of</strong> UFO Technologies <strong>and</strong> Extraterrestrial Contact 291<br />

be 10-20 percent less. The market price at the time <strong>of</strong> the announcement<br />

was $1.50 but immediately soared to a new high <strong>of</strong> $2.44 a bushel. 8<br />

Guess who paid the 91 cents difference in price for the Russians Our<br />

bread prices <strong>and</strong> meat prices were immediately inflated reflecting the suddenly<br />

diminished supply. It was the beginning <strong>of</strong> the high inflation <strong>of</strong> the<br />

70s. Now how much did the Moon cost us Would our government be a<br />

party to blackmail Nah!<br />

However, if NASA knew that Kennedy's dream was impossible in the<br />

time frame given, they should have reported this to the President. We are<br />

civilized now <strong>and</strong> no longer cut <strong>of</strong>f the right arm <strong>of</strong> the messenger who<br />

brings bad news. Now we cut <strong>of</strong>f budgets! That's safer for the messenger<br />

but fatal to the bureaucracy in question.<br />

NASA must have decided if they couldn't make it they would fake it.<br />

Big bucks were at stake here, to say nothing <strong>of</strong> American prestige. Those<br />

bucks, properly funneled, would buy a lot <strong>of</strong> southeast Asia, at least for<br />

awhile. And with proper prestidigitation some <strong>of</strong> the same could wind up<br />

in numbered accounts h<strong>and</strong>led either by the "gnomes <strong>of</strong> Zurich" or <strong>of</strong>fshore<br />

Caribbean banks.<br />

NASA'S OTHER PROBLEM<br />

NASA's second problem was magnified as a result <strong>of</strong> the first. If they were<br />

really going to l<strong>and</strong> on the Moon they would be able to take great quantities<br />

<strong>of</strong> real photos <strong>and</strong> pick up genuine Moon rocks. Such pictures should include<br />

the Earth rising or setting against a background <strong>of</strong> a bona fide starry sky.<br />

However, if they weren't actually going to the Moon, the evidence<br />

would have to be synthesized. Credible pro<strong>of</strong> was vital to the continued<br />

high rate <strong>of</strong> funding <strong>and</strong> to NASA's very survival. NASA's labs could create<br />

"Moon rocks" to the specifications <strong>of</strong> an educated, or rather an expected,<br />

guess that would pass any inspection, because there wasn't anything<br />

else to compare them to.<br />

Or they could have used rock samples picked up in Antarctica during<br />

the intensive exploration <strong>of</strong> that continent during the International Geophysical<br />

Year in 1957. They would do as well provided there were no fossils<br />

in them. These rocks could be slowly doled out, but only to those geologists<br />

who could be counted on to agree with anything the government<br />

said. And most <strong>of</strong> academia can be relied on to do just that!<br />

Strangely enough rocks were later found in Antarctica that closely<br />

resemble "Moon rocks." In point <strong>of</strong> fact, some geologists are now positive<br />

that these rocks were blasted from the Moon to Earth during immense<br />

meteoric impacts.<br />

However, true-to-the-Moon photos posed a bit more <strong>of</strong> a problem.<br />

Because the twentieth century is the age <strong>of</strong> increasingly sophisticated pho-

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!