Eisen-Suppressed-Inventions-and-other-Discoveries-True-Stories-of ...

The Suppression of UFO Technologies and Extraterrestrial Contact 403
claimed that the stars could not be seen in space, but that special diffraction
gratings were being developed to attempt to see them. This was from
the period from Sheppard on to Skylab. I later spoke with John Bartoe who
was up on an early shuttle flight and he laughed at this, said he couldn't
believe that anyone in NASA would say that because he was in space and
the stars were brighter than they are on Earth! (They must have slipped
him a working diffraction grating.) I called back my contact in NASA and
he told me, "Sir, the astronaut is a trained observer and is reporting what
he saw, but the information I gave you (about the blackness of space) was
essentially correct." I spoke with the man who developed the film for
NASA for twenty-five years and he told me that the astronauts weren't
even sure if they could see the sun, that it may have been the appearance
of the sun on their windows!
The fact is that there are no visible light photographs of the sun, the
stars, or any planets (other than the Earth and Moon, and not including
specific probes sent to those planets) available in any NASA photo catalog.
The fact that no stars appear on any photos was one of the main pillars
of evidence for Bill Kaysing's book. Rene is the source of the astronauts'
quotes as above and feels that there must be some serious problem
with this selective star-blindness. As there is no definite answer available
to us right now as to whether or not we can see the stars in space, I would
have to say that we cannot base our conclusion as to the validity of the
Apollo flights on the evidence of the appearance (or nonappearance) of
stars in NASA photos.
THERMAL PROBLEMS
Space is supposed to be at absolute zero. Anything directly in the sunshine
heats up incredibly. Skylab overheated when one of its solar panels failed
to deploy properly, yet Apollo 13, in direct sunlight and in a lethal radiation
zone, supposedly got cold! On the launch pad the ship is air conditioned
from ground services. In space the ship is air conditioned (powered
by fuel cells), if you turn off that air conditioner the ship gets cold! At
least that is what NASA's line of logic dictates. Apollo 17's LEM sat on
the Moon in the direct sun for 75 hours straight. Without massive power
and refrigeration units the only way to cool the LEM would have been
with the explosive cooling of water. Many tons would have been necessary
for that time period. The astronauts reported that the LEMs were "too
cold to sleep in." How cold would your closed car be after 75 hours of
direct sunlight (or even 1 hour)
The life support backpacks that the astronauts wore were supposed to
COOL them on the lunar surface by discharging water from a blowhole.
Conservative calculation of the water necessary to accomplish this, given