10.02.2015 Views

Eisen-Suppressed-Inventions-and-other-Discoveries-True-Stories-of ...

Eisen-Suppressed-Inventions-and-other-Discoveries-True-Stories-of ...

Eisen-Suppressed-Inventions-and-other-Discoveries-True-Stories-of ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

372 <strong>Suppressed</strong> <strong>Inventions</strong> <strong>and</strong> Other <strong>Discoveries</strong><br />

dreds <strong>of</strong> engineers, technicians, <strong>and</strong> secretaries directly involved in the<br />

missions <strong>and</strong> the communication links.<br />

Yet the rumours persist. NASA may well be a civilian agency, but many<br />

<strong>of</strong> its programmes are funded by the defence budget, as I have pointed out,<br />

<strong>and</strong> most <strong>of</strong> the astronauts are subject to military security regulations.<br />

Apart from the fact that the National Security Agency screens all films<br />

(<strong>and</strong> probably radio communications as well), we have the statements by<br />

Otto Binder, Dr. Garry Henderson <strong>and</strong> Maurice Chatelain that the astronauts<br />

were under strict orders not to discuss their sightings. And Gordon<br />

Cooper has testified to a UN committee that one <strong>of</strong> the astronauts actually<br />

witnessed a UFO on the ground. If there is no secrecy, why has this<br />

sighting not been made public<br />

Not all communications between the astronauts <strong>and</strong> ground control<br />

are public, as NASA itself admits. John McLeaish, Chief <strong>of</strong> Public<br />

Information at the Manned Spacecraft Center (now Lyndon B. Johnson<br />

Space Center) in Houston, explained to me in 1970 that although there is<br />

no separate radio frequency used by the astronauts for private conversations<br />

with mission control, private conversations, "usually to discuss medical<br />

problems," are re-routed: "When the astronauts request a private conversation,<br />

or when a private conversation is deemed necessary by <strong>of</strong>ficials<br />

on the ground, it is transmitted on the same S-b<strong>and</strong> radio frequencies as<br />

are normally used but it is routed through different audio circuits on the<br />

ground; <strong>and</strong> unlike <strong>other</strong> air-to-ground conversations with the spacecraft,<br />

it is not released to the general public."<br />

But is there any truth to the Apollo 11 story A friend <strong>of</strong> mine who formerly<br />

served in a branch <strong>of</strong> British military intelligence has provided me<br />

with unexpected corroboration. I am not permitted to reveal the name <strong>of</strong><br />

my source, nor the location <strong>and</strong> date <strong>of</strong> the following conversation that<br />

was overheard <strong>and</strong> subsequently confirmed by my friend, which will<br />

inevitably lay me open to charges <strong>of</strong> fabricating the story or being the victim<br />

<strong>of</strong> a hoax. Yet the story must be told, however apocryphal.<br />

A certain pr<strong>of</strong>essor (whose name is known to me) was engaged in an<br />

earnest discussion with Neil Armstrong during a NASA symposium, <strong>and</strong><br />

according to my friend's recollection, part <strong>of</strong> the conversation went as follows:<br />

PROFESSOR: What really happened out there with Apollo 11<br />

ARMSTRONG:<br />

It was incredible ... <strong>of</strong> course, we had always known<br />

there was a possibility ... the fact is, we were<br />

warned <strong>of</strong>f. There was never any question then <strong>of</strong> a<br />

space station or a moon city.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!