10.02.2015 Views

Eisen-Suppressed-Inventions-and-other-Discoveries-True-Stories-of ...

Eisen-Suppressed-Inventions-and-other-Discoveries-True-Stories-of ...

Eisen-Suppressed-Inventions-and-other-Discoveries-True-Stories-of ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

The Suppression <strong>of</strong> Alternative Medical Therapies 159<br />

sidered as <strong>of</strong>ficial declarations. But, after thinking over all that you<br />

showed, <strong>and</strong> told me, during my recent visit, I have come to unequivocal<br />

conclusions on the physical value <strong>of</strong> the instrumentation you are<br />

using to pursue your research.<br />

As I told you, if my knowledge <strong>of</strong> physics <strong>and</strong> mathematics can be <strong>of</strong><br />

service to you, I would be very glad to put them at your disposition.<br />

It can be deduced that Aumont's enthusiasm for what he had seen<br />

caused a stir in the Quebec Ministry <strong>of</strong> Health, for on 17 July, Naessens<br />

received an <strong>of</strong>ficial letter from that <strong>of</strong>fice stating that the minister was<br />

eager to have his microscope "<strong>of</strong>ficially examined" if its inventor would<br />

"furnish in writing details concerning this apparatus, including all its optical,<br />

<strong>and</strong> <strong>other</strong>, particularities, as well as its powers <strong>of</strong> magnification, so that<br />

experts to be named by the minister can evaluate its unique properties."<br />

In reply to this letter, Naessens's lawyer sent a list <strong>of</strong> details as requested<br />

<strong>and</strong> stated: "You will, <strong>of</strong> course, underst<strong>and</strong> that it is impossible for<br />

Monsieur Naessens to furnish you, in correspondence, with the complete<br />

description <strong>of</strong> a highly novel microscope which is, moreover, unprotected<br />

by any patent." Then, to explain why no patent had yet been granted, he<br />

added a key phrase: "since its mathematical constants have, up to the present,<br />

not been elucidated in spite <strong>of</strong> a great deal <strong>of</strong> tiresome work performed<br />

in that regard." In <strong>other</strong> words, it seemed that Aumont <strong>and</strong> his colleagues<br />

had been unable to explain the superiority <strong>of</strong> the microscope in<br />

terms <strong>of</strong> all the known laws <strong>of</strong> optics <strong>and</strong> it still seems that, so far, no one<br />

else has been able to do so.<br />

There have been interesting recent reports on new microscopes being<br />

developed that apparently rival the magnification powers <strong>of</strong> Naessens's<br />

somatoscope. It would seem, however, that the 150 angstroms <strong>of</strong> resolution<br />

achieved by Naessens's instrument has not yet been matched.<br />

The Los Angeles-based World Research Foundation's flyer, presenting<br />

its autumn (1990) conference "New Directions for Medicine ... Focusing<br />

on Solutions," announced the development <strong>of</strong> an Ergonom-400x microscope,<br />

used by a German Heilpraktiker, or healer, Bernhard Muschlien,<br />

who paid a visit to Naessens's laboratory in 1985. While his microscope<br />

is apparently capable <strong>of</strong> achieving 25,000-fold magnification, its stated<br />

resolution is 100 nanometres (1000 angstroms), or several orders <strong>of</strong> magnitude<br />

less than the 150 angstroms developed with the somatoscope.*<br />

In the July 1990 issue <strong>of</strong> Popular Science, an article "Super Scopes"<br />

refers to an extraordinary new technology in microscopy engineered at<br />

Cornell University under the direction <strong>of</strong> Pr<strong>of</strong>essor Michael Isaacson, <strong>and</strong><br />

also in Israel. The technology uses not lenses but apertures smaller than<br />

* One nanometre is one-billionth <strong>of</strong> a metre; one angstrom is ten-billionths <strong>of</strong> a metre, or<br />

one-tenth <strong>of</strong> a nanometre.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!