Eisen-Suppressed-Inventions-and-other-Discoveries-True-Stories-of ...

400 Suppressed Inventions and Other Discoveries
Photo 3. Mutt & Jeff
However, other lunar photos not mentioned by Rene, but appearing in
some of the other previously mentioned books, indicate movement and
structure on the Moon. One well known photo (Photo 4), shot from an
unmanned orbiter, which has even appeared in National Geographic,
shows "boulders" rolling, allegedly from a moonquake. However, basic
scrutiny shows that they are rolling up and down hill. Lesser known photographs
show these same "boulders" on other areas of the Moon making
identical track marks. Photo 5 is from National Geographic, September
1973, and was shot by the crew of Apollo 17. A close-up shot of this same
boulder has appeared in a recent issue of Nexus magazine, October-
November 1995, which shows it to be the same cylindrical shape with
arms as the larger rolling boulder of Photo 4.
Domed and pointed building-like structures appear in craters. These
have been written off as lava bubbles or geological responses to the
impacts causing the craters, even though the physical evidence goes
against them being impact craters (the rim heights are similar regardless
of crater diameter). Photo 6 is an enlarged section of a photo of the crater
Kepler which appeared in the February 1969 National Geographic. It
looks to me like there is an artificial complex in Kepler. Fred Steckling
has a blowup of this structure in his book.
While Rene has shown some serious problems with the lunar photos,
mostly those of the astronauts on the Moon, he doesn't show any of the
boulder or dome photos. I would have to concur that many of the astronaut
photos are faked, it becomes obvious after a while. However, I don't
think this necessarily brings us to the conclusion that NASA didn't go, but