24.02.2015 Views

Financing Child Care in the United States - Ewing Marion Kauffman ...

Financing Child Care in the United States - Ewing Marion Kauffman ...

Financing Child Care in the United States - Ewing Marion Kauffman ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

UNIONS<br />

NYSLMCCAC ENRICHMENT GRANTS<br />

PROGRAM (NEW YORK)<br />

DESCRIPTION<br />

The New York State Labor/Management <strong>Child</strong> <strong>Care</strong><br />

Advisory Committee (<strong>the</strong> Committee) has established,<br />

and cont<strong>in</strong>ues to support, a network of 50 work–site child<br />

care centers for children of state employees. In addition,<br />

several o<strong>the</strong>r programs have been developed to assist<br />

state employees with work/life concerns.<br />

WHEN ESTABLISHED<br />

The Committee was established, and began to provide<br />

start–up grants and technical assistance, <strong>in</strong> 1981. In<br />

1986, support from <strong>the</strong> Committee was expanded to<br />

<strong>in</strong>clude health and safety grants. In 1989, <strong>the</strong> health–<br />

and–safety–grant concept was broadened to <strong>in</strong>clude<br />

staff development and o<strong>the</strong>r operat<strong>in</strong>g costs, and it was<br />

renamed <strong>the</strong> Enrichment Grants program.<br />

ANNUAL AMOUNT<br />

In <strong>the</strong> 1997–98 state fiscal year, $1.65 million was<br />

expended for <strong>the</strong> Enrichment Grants program and<br />

$296,221 for separate Health and Safety Grants; <strong>in</strong><br />

1998–99, $1.73 million was expended for <strong>the</strong><br />

Enrichment Grants program. These funds, and o<strong>the</strong>rs<br />

overseen by <strong>the</strong> Committee, are set aside as part of <strong>the</strong><br />

collective barga<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g process with <strong>the</strong> follow<strong>in</strong>g unions:<br />

Civil Service Employees Association (CSEA), Public<br />

Employees Federation (PEF), <strong>United</strong> University<br />

Professions (UUP), Council 82, District Council 37 and<br />

<strong>the</strong> Graduate Student Employees Union. The Governor’s<br />

Office of Employee Relations also contributes on behalf<br />

of management/confidential employees.<br />

SERVICES FUNDED<br />

The grants may be used for <strong>the</strong> follow<strong>in</strong>g: staff salaries<br />

(with some restrictions) and benefits, staff development,<br />

health and safety projects, professional services (such as<br />

bookkeep<strong>in</strong>g and legal assistance), supplies, equipment,<br />

non–rout<strong>in</strong>e ma<strong>in</strong>tenance, liability <strong>in</strong>surance, advertis<strong>in</strong>g,<br />

food and occasional labor. In addition to provid<strong>in</strong>g<br />

technical assistance and start–up grants, <strong>the</strong> Committee<br />

has established an Enrichment Grants program to enable<br />

<strong>the</strong> centers to address program quality issues and<br />

ma<strong>in</strong>ta<strong>in</strong> affordable fees for employee parents.<br />

HOW FUNDS DISTRIBUTED<br />

Funds are distributed through contracts between each<br />

center and <strong>the</strong> Governor’s Office of Employee Relations<br />

(which staffs <strong>the</strong> Committee.) The centers are required to<br />

submit an expenditure plan for <strong>the</strong> total grant amount, a<br />

staff<strong>in</strong>g plan, a list of board members, a year–end audit,<br />

<strong>the</strong> board’s response to <strong>the</strong> audit management letter<br />

and certification of grant expenditures. Additionally, all<br />

network centers must establish a slid<strong>in</strong>g fee scale.<br />

Grant funds are distributed to <strong>the</strong> centers based on a<br />

formula that takes <strong>in</strong>to consideration <strong>the</strong> number of<br />

state employees’ children enrolled and <strong>the</strong> percentage<br />

of low–<strong>in</strong>come parents served. Centers that receive<br />

accreditation from <strong>the</strong> National Academy of Early<br />

<strong>Child</strong>hood Programs receive a one–time additional<br />

$5,000 <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong>ir operat<strong>in</strong>g grants.<br />

POPULATION SERVED<br />

Network centers primarily serve children of state<br />

employees, although <strong>the</strong>y may serve <strong>the</strong> larger<br />

community as well, and many do. Ra<strong>the</strong>r than requir<strong>in</strong>g<br />

<strong>the</strong> centers to serve a specific percentage of state<br />

employees, <strong>the</strong> Committee expects <strong>the</strong> centers to give<br />

priority to children of state employees and to establish<br />

a slid<strong>in</strong>g fee scale for <strong>the</strong>se employees.<br />

STRATEGIC CONSIDERATIONS<br />

• Dur<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> years that it helped to establish a network<br />

of work–site child care centers, <strong>the</strong> Committee learned<br />

first–hand that child care was critically under–funded.<br />

It became clear to <strong>the</strong> Committee that <strong>in</strong> order for <strong>the</strong><br />

centers to keep parent fees affordable and ma<strong>in</strong>ta<strong>in</strong><br />

high–quality standards, operat<strong>in</strong>g support <strong>in</strong> addition to<br />

parent fees was necessary.<br />

• New York State’s network of work–site child care<br />

centers is a visible, tangible response to employees’<br />

needs for high–quality child care. Several of <strong>the</strong><br />

centers provide care dur<strong>in</strong>g odd hours (for example,<br />

for children of shift workers at state mental health<br />

and correctional facilities). Many provide before– and<br />

after–school programs as well as holiday programs and<br />

summer camps. Employees are pleased with <strong>the</strong><br />

centers. The state benefits from improved morale and<br />

productivity and decreased absenteeism.<br />

• Fund<strong>in</strong>g for New York’s work–site child care centers<br />

comes from <strong>the</strong> collective barga<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g agreements with<br />

six public employee unions. Currently, <strong>the</strong> state has<br />

reached agreement with one union (UUP), while <strong>the</strong><br />

o<strong>the</strong>r five collective barga<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g agreements have<br />

expired. There are no funds available for <strong>the</strong><br />

Enrichment Grant Program, pend<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> outcome of<br />

negotiations.<br />

• Many state employees are not able to benefit from <strong>the</strong><br />

work–site centers. Many centers have wait<strong>in</strong>g lists, and<br />

services for <strong>in</strong>fants and toddlers are extremely limited.<br />

The Committee has attempted to address this concern<br />

by develop<strong>in</strong>g a number of related programs, <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g:<br />

enhanced resource and referral services; a Work and<br />

Family Initiatives Fund, which makes small grants<br />

available to local labor/management committees for<br />

118

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!