Download - Maize
Download - Maize
Download - Maize
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
2015: At least 10 new inbred lines and 20 new hybrids/OPVs with resistance to post‐harvest insectpests/pathogens<br />
developed and made available for use by partners; markers/genes/QTL for<br />
resistance to post‐harvest insect‐pest/pathogen detected and validated.<br />
2016: A publicly‐accessible database on post‐harvest insect pests, losses, extent of mycotoxin<br />
contamination and relevant technological interventions developed and made available to<br />
partners.<br />
2013–16: At least 80,000 people in target countries informed about mycotoxin‐associated health risks,<br />
low‐cost storage structures, mycotoxin‐assaying methodologies and management strategies.<br />
2016: Ex‐post assessment undertaken to gauge the impact of improved storage technologies on the<br />
livelihoods of adopting farmers.<br />
Linkages with other SIs<br />
SI 6 will use high‐potential, stress‐tolerant germplasm developed in SI 4 and SI 5 as parental materials<br />
for introgression of genes affecting mycotoxin contamination, and will deliver tolerant donors for use in<br />
these SIs. SI 6 will use new tools developed in SI 9 (particularly doubled haploids) to speed line<br />
extraction, and introduce rapid‐cycle genomic selection to speed population improvement for highly<br />
quantitative traits such as storage insect resistance.<br />
What's new in this initiative?<br />
The SI will take a mulitfaceted approach— advanced breeding tools (including doubled haploids and<br />
markers) will develop germplasm that combines resistance to post‐harvest insect pests, ear molds,<br />
drought and mycotoxin contamination, and this will be coupled with introduction of low‐cost<br />
storage structures and mycotoxin assaying techniques to limit post‐harvest losses and mycotoxinrelated<br />
health risks. Biocontrol would be a new tool for aflatoxin mitigation in Africa.<br />
The SI shall aggressively tackle the problems of scaling up low‐cost storage structures and screening<br />
assays, also lift awareness of problems and thus mitigate post‐harvest losses and health risks and<br />
burdens from mycotoxin contamination. Safe storage of maize at the farm level is crucial, as it<br />
directly impacts poverty alleviation, food and income security, and prosperity for smallholder<br />
farmers.<br />
Megaprogram‐level investment provides the long‐term focus needed to effectively address the<br />
complex problems of PHL and mycotoxin contamination for maize.<br />
Targets and impact estimates<br />
Primary targets for this SI will be maize‐based farming systems in five countries of sub‐Saharan Africa<br />
(Kenya, Malawi, Nigeria, Uganda and Ghana), two countries in Asia (Indonesia and Nepal), and Mexico.<br />
In all these countries maize yields are low relative to worldwide averages and crops suffer high levels of<br />
mycotoxin contamination, with more than 15% of grain lost during storage.<br />
Kenya Malawi Nigeria Uganda Ghana Indonesia Nepal Mexico<br />
Production 2,367,237 3,444,655 7,525,000 1,266,000 1,100,000 17,659,067 1,878,648 24,320,100<br />
(tons)<br />
Grain loss (%) 20–25 20–25 5–10 20–25 5–10 6–17 4–22 10–25<br />
Mycotoxin 25–30%; 9% 27% 30% 65–80%; 47%; 50–83% 20–89%;<br />
incidences (%) > 20 ppb > 20 ppb > 20 ppb > 20 ppb; 30-2000 ppb >50 ppb >50 ppb >20 ppb<br />
No. of poor (in 9.0 5.9 107.1 7.8 10.7 18.2 10.4 10.9<br />
millions, under<br />
USD 1 )<br />
131