Download - Maize

Bilateral funding: Following the Consortium’s guidance, Scenarios 1 and 2 assume that bilateral funding
increases by 5% annually, using 2011 as a base. Estimates for 2010 and 2011 are aligned with those
compiled by the Consortium in October 2010 and include confirmed contracts. A 5% annual increase in
bilateral funding beyond 2011 is a conservative estimate, given that bilateral funding increased 34% in
2010 (current budgets) and 21% in 2011 (current contracts, and contracts whose total value has been
confirmed by donors but are not yet signed). As a result, there is good reason to assume that a 5%
growth can be achieved, and more. Once clarity is obtained on who participates in “CGIAR Fund
mechanisms”, bilateral funding may be divided between members and non‐members.
CGIAR Window 1‐3 unrestricted funding: Scenario 1 assumes that CGIAR Window 1‐3 unrestricted
funding increases annually at 5% over 2010 and also provides all management costs associated with
CGIAR Window 1‐3 funding. Scenario 2 assumes that CGIAR Window 1‐3 unrestricted funding increases
annually at 5% over 2010 and also provides all management costs associated with implementing MAIZE.
The summary results of the two scenarios are presented in Table 6, with more details provided for each
scenario in Tables 7A and 7B. Scenario 1 and 2 bring MAIZE to 68% and 72% of full funding with
proportions of CGIAR Window 1‐3 funding of 23% and 26%, respectively, as compared to a current level
of 28% in 2009 and 24% in 2010.
Table 6. Funding scenarios for MAIZE.
million USD over three years (2011 ‐ 2013) Scenario 1 Scenario 2 Full funding
Total Budget 162.0 170.1 237.8
Total Budget in proportion of full funding 68% 72% 100%
Total CGIAR Window 1‐3 36.6 44.7
Proportion CGIAR Window 1‐3 23% 26%
Total Bilateral funding 125.4 125.4
Proportion Bilateral 77% 74%
72