Download - Maize

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Strategic Initiative SI 2. Sustainable intensification and income opportunities for the poor Partner type NARESs in Africa, Asia and Latin America CIMMYT and IITA Universities (Cornell, Stanford, Oklahoma State, Florida, Washington, UMB‐Norway, APSRU‐Australia); other ARIs (CSIRO, CIRAD, EMBRAPA) CIAT, CIP, ICRISAT, IITA, ICRAF, ILRI, IRRI, Universities (Cornell, Stanford, Oklahoma State, Florida, Washington, UMB‐Norway, APSRU‐Australia); other ARIs (CSIRO, CIRAD, EMBRAPA) Farmers, input and output market participants including: equipment manufacturers, seed companies, agro‐dealers, farmer cooperatives, grain merchants, credit agencies, regulatory agencies, seed trade associations, etc. Local and international NGOs and CBOs, extension providers, NARSs, seed companies and networks (e.g. the African Conservation Tillage Network), farmer organizations, regional and international organizations (e.g. FAO, AGRA) Private sector ICT companies Partner roles Farming system and value chain analysis, farmer participatory research (conservation agriculture, varieties, commodity mix) within‐country but for regionally relevant/prioritized maize‐based systems, using the concept of innovation platforms/hubs; main hub/innovation platform managers Facilitation of innovation systems approaches for most important maize‐based systems (i.e. where maize is the dominant crop), cross‐national, cross‐regional and cross‐program learning and knowledge management; maize‐specific inputs from other Strategic Initiatives such as germplasm, conservation agriculture approaches, nutrient management approaches, maize‐relevant GIS information, impact and targeting information Members of inter‐institutional research for development (R for D) team to identify promising technology for conservation agriculture, crop rotation, crops, trees and livestock, and conduct applied research on‐farm Members of inter‐institutional R for D team providing specific technologies and know‐how on conservation agriculture, crop rotation, crops, trees and livestock, systems modeling, use of ICT and scaling out Members of the innovation research network, providing feedback, executing part of the research (e.g. on‐farm research, farmer‐led research, new machinery, seed production for farmer‐participatory research trials) and use, adapt and scale‐out successful research outputs Feedback to and scaling out of SI 2 know‐how and information; adoption of innovation platform/hub concept for local adaptive systems innovation, depending on their geographical presence Collaborator in designing, testing and implementing the dissemination of scalable, GIS‐ and MIS‐responsive information to farmers and extension 40
Strategic Initiative SI 3. Smallholder precision agriculture SI 4. Stress tolerant maize for the poorest Partner type At least five IARCs (CIMMYT, CIAT, ICRISAT, IITA and IRRI); Universities (Cornell, Stanford, Oklahoma State, North Carolina, Adelaide); other ARIs (International Plant Nutrition Institute, ICAR‐India, CAAS‐China and EMBRAPA) CIMMYT and IITA NARESs where the target farming systems are important, including universities; the private sector (i.e. seed companies and farm implement manufacturers); NGOs and farmer groups. Private sector ICT companies Local and international NGOs and CBOs, extension providers, NARSs, seed companies and networks (e.g. the African Conservation Tillage Network), farmer organizations, regional and international organizations (e.g. FAO, AGRA) NARSs and local seed companies in sub‐Saharan Africa and Asia and in poverty pockets in Central America CIMMYT and IITA Partner roles Specialist knowledge in precision agriculture applied to field situations Facilitation of the international exploratory diagnostic trials, development of international database, ensuring appropriate data processing to enable precision agriculture applications pioneered by research partners International exploratory diagnostic trials; experimentation with pioneering precision agriculture implementation Collaborator in designing, testing and implementing the dissemination of scalable, GIS‐ and MIS‐responsive information to farmers and extension providers Feedback to and scaling out of SI 3 know‐how and information; adoption of research concepts for generation of more localized information, depending on their geographical presence High‐quality collaborative phenotyping, open‐source breeding and testing for stress‐prone environments, clustered by mega‐environments, agreed trait priorities and client needs; managed through competitive performance contracts Facilitation and participation in collaborative germplasm development with particular focus on cutting‐edge breeding approaches (doubled‐haploids, genomics selection, precision phenotyping) for stress environments; international data exchange and main source germplasm provider; seed business training and value chain analysis for stress environments; broker for use of proprietary know‐how, technologies and germplasm 41
Page 1: MAIZE ‐ Global Alliance for Impro
Page 4 and 5: Abbreviations 1 AFLP CA CBO CEO CGI
Page 6 and 7: Executive summary Recurrent food pr
Page 8 and 9: All SIs include capacity building t
Page 10 and 11: essentially the same land area whil
Page 12 and 13: Competing uses for a staple grain A
Page 14 and 15: Figure 3. Annual global yield fluct
Page 16 and 17: environments and capacity building.
Page 18 and 19: productivity while reversing widesp
Page 20 and 21: Target Group 3: Poor consumers and
Page 22 and 23: poverty reduction, food insecurity,
Page 24 and 25: Methods Innovative approaches to a
Page 26 and 27: Methods Aggressive development, va
Page 28 and 29: Outcomes Novel tools will empower N
Page 30 and 31: Based on the maize systems describe
Page 32 and 33: Program‐level product delivery Pr
Page 34 and 35: Impact pathways Impact pathways are
Page 36 and 37: Outcomes for MAIZE as a whole shown
Page 38 and 39: The portfolio of Strategic Initiati
Page 40 and 41: Table 2. Summary of impacts of MAIZ
Page 42 and 43: allocate their time to more product
Page 44 and 45: fall short of making up the differe
Page 46 and 47: Priority setting to plan future rev
Page 50 and 51: Strategic Initiative SI 4. Stress t
Page 52 and 53: Strategic Initiative SI 7. Nutritio
Page 54 and 55: Partnership principles While the pa
Page 56 and 57: Based on current staff and partner
Page 58 and 59: Oversight Committee: This committee
Page 60 and 61: Review and refine priorities, targe
Page 62 and 63: Price Trade Policy REDD, PES, Reser
Page 64 and 65: CGIAR Research Program Outputs from
Page 66 and 67: Climate change strategy The impact
Page 68 and 69: Process monitoring will include par
Page 70 and 71: Given the high costs and difficulti
Page 72 and 73: the uptake of outputs and the inten
Page 74 and 75: CIMMYT has developed such partnersh
Page 76 and 77: 12. Decision makers understand and
Page 78 and 79: Scaling up and out of methodologies
Page 80 and 81: Bilateral funding: Following the Co
Page 82 and 83: Table 7A. Income and expenses for S
Page 84 and 85: Expenses by Strategic Initiative: T
Page 86 and 87: References Alston, M.J., Norton, W.
Page 88 and 89: MAIZE Strategic Initiatives Strateg
Page 90 and 91: Targeting resource‐poor farmers i
Page 92 and 93: Knowledge of the structure and func
Page 94 and 95: 2014: Analysis of policy options an
Page 96 and 97: Strategic Initiative 2. Sustainable
Page 98 and 99:
stress‐tolerant germplasm, better
Page 100 and 101:
Researchable issues Effective appr
Page 102 and 103:
Key milestones 2011: Maize‐based
Page 104 and 105:
Modernizing agriculture through use
Page 106 and 107:
coherent exploratory diagnostic tri
Page 108 and 109:
universities, the private sector (i
Page 110 and 111:
What's new in this initiative? To
Page 112 and 113:
Strategic Initiative 4. Stress‐to
Page 114 and 115:
(mycotoxins) also contaminate grain
Page 116 and 117:
CIMMYT and IITA breeding programs a
Page 118 and 119:
Institutional weaknesses affecting
Page 120 and 121:
Research and development partners C
Page 122 and 123:
What's new in this initiative? Dro
Page 124 and 125:
Gerpacio, R.V. and Pingali, P.L. 20
Page 126 and 127:
gain per year. The physiological ba
Page 128 and 129:
Intellectual property management of
Page 130 and 131:
Other producer‐ or consumer‐rel
Page 132 and 133:
considered “women’s” crops, a
Page 134 and 135:
subtropical, mid‐altitude, transi
Page 136 and 137:
mycotoxin monitoring capacity of re
Page 138 and 139:
4. Hubs and protocols to phenotype
Page 140 and 141:
Assuming that low‐cost storage fa
Page 142 and 143:
Mugo, S., Likhayo, P., Karaya, H.,
Page 144 and 145:
More than two‐thirds of the globa
Page 146 and 147:
Commercial QPM seed is currently av
Page 148 and 149:
Outputs 1. High‐throughput and lo
Page 150 and 151:
Linkages with other SIs SI 7 will m
Page 152 and 153:
Meenakshi JV, Johnson N, Manyong V,
Page 154 and 155:
Compared with the genomes of other
Page 156 and 157:
Breeding programs will achieve more
Page 158 and 159:
Strategic Initiative 9. New tools a
Page 160 and 161:
Through collaboration among CIMMYT,
Page 162 and 163:
o Generating predictive power of ha
Page 164 and 165:
generated from CIMMYT and IITA bree
Page 166 and 167:
Strategic Initiatives 1-9. Summary
Page 168 and 169:
Techniques of good quality seed pro
Page 170 and 171:
Annex 1. Population, poor and maize
Page 172 and 173:
Bolivia, CIF Botswana, Department A
Page 174 and 175:
Swaziland, Ministry of Agriculture
Page 176 and 177:
India, Meerut, Sardar Vallabah Bhai
Page 178 and 179:
Uganda, NASECO Seeds 1996 Ltd Ugand
Page 180 and 181:
Annex 3. Impact pathways for MAIZE:
Page 182 and 183:
Main outputs of MAIZE SIs 4. Instit
Page 184:
Annex 4. CIMMYT maize mega‐enviro
show all

Download - Maize

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?