Uganda, NASECO Seeds 1996 Ltd Uganda, Victoria Seed Limited (VS) USA, BASF USA, Pioneer Hi‐Bred Intl. Zambia, ZamSeed Zimbabwe, AGRITEX Zimbabwe, Seed Co (also in Zambia) Non‐Governmental Organizations and Farmers Cooperative Organizations Angola, Catholic Relief Services (CRS) Burkina Faso, Regional Agribusiness and Trade Promotion (ATP) Project, West Africa Colombia, Bogota, Colombian Cereal Growers Association (FENALCE) Colombia, Bogota, Colombian Palm Oil Growers Association (FEDEPALMA) El Salvador, Catholic Relief Services (CRS) Ethiopia, World Vision (WV) Honduras, La Ceiba, Fundacion Investigacion Participativa con Agricultores de Honduras (FIPAH) Kenya, Catholic Diocese of Embu Kenya, Catholic Diocese of Homabay Kenya, Catholic Relief Services (CRS) Kenya, World Vision (WV) Malawi, Seed Trade Association of Malawi Malawi, Total Landcare Malawi, World Vision (WV) Mali, Comptoir Mali, DNA Mali, Fasokaba Mexico, Salamanca, Gto., Agricultura Sostenible en Base a Siembra Directa, ASOSI D Mexico, Mexico, D.F., Sistema Producto Maiz del D.F. Mozambique, Chimoio, Manica Farmers Association Nepal, ABTRACO‐Kathmandu Nepal, CeCRED‐Parbat Nepal, DIWO‐Syangja Nepal, DOS‐Gorkha Nepal, FORWARD‐Chitwan Nepal, KDF‐Khotang Nepal, LIBIRD‐Pokhara Nepal, RAS‐Dang Nepal, SAHAS‐Okhaldhunga Nepal, Support Foundation‐Kanchanpur Nepal, TTRI‐Lalitpur Nepal, TUKI‐Sindhupalchowk Nepal, UJBP‐Arghakhanchi Nepal, YMMC‐Jajarkot Nepal, International Development Enterprises Nigeria, Commercial Agriculture Development Project Switzerland, Syngenta Foundation for Sustainable Agriculture Tanzania, Tanzania Participatory Nature Conservation Movement (TPNCM) Zambia, Monze, Farmer Training Center 170
Zambia, Lusaka, Golden Valley Agricultural Research Trust Zambia, Programme Against Malnutrition Zimbabwe, Development Aid from People to People (DAPP) Countries hosting MAIZE offices Afghanistan, Kabul, Ministry of Agriculture Bangladesh, Dhaka, Ministry of Agriculture China, Beijing, Ministry of Agriculture Colombia, Cali, International Center for Agriculture in the Tropics (CIAT) Ethiopia, Addis Ababa, Ministry of Agriculture India, Hyderabad, ICRISAT Kenya, Nairobi, Ministry of Agriculture Mexico, Texcoco, Ministry of Agriculture Nepal, Kathmandu, Ministry of Agriculture Nigeria, Ibidan, Ministry of Agriculture Zimbabwe, Harare, Ministry of Agriculture 171
- Page 1:
MAIZE ‐ Global Alliance for Impro
- Page 4 and 5:
Abbreviations 1 AFLP CA CBO CEO CGI
- Page 6 and 7:
Executive summary Recurrent food pr
- Page 8 and 9:
All SIs include capacity building t
- Page 10 and 11:
essentially the same land area whil
- Page 12 and 13:
Competing uses for a staple grain A
- Page 14 and 15:
Figure 3. Annual global yield fluct
- Page 16 and 17:
environments and capacity building.
- Page 18 and 19:
productivity while reversing widesp
- Page 20 and 21:
Target Group 3: Poor consumers and
- Page 22 and 23:
poverty reduction, food insecurity,
- Page 24 and 25:
Methods Innovative approaches to a
- Page 26 and 27:
Methods Aggressive development, va
- Page 28 and 29:
Outcomes Novel tools will empower N
- Page 30 and 31:
Based on the maize systems describe
- Page 32 and 33:
Program‐level product delivery Pr
- Page 34 and 35:
Impact pathways Impact pathways are
- Page 36 and 37:
Outcomes for MAIZE as a whole shown
- Page 38 and 39:
The portfolio of Strategic Initiati
- Page 40 and 41:
Table 2. Summary of impacts of MAIZ
- Page 42 and 43:
allocate their time to more product
- Page 44 and 45:
fall short of making up the differe
- Page 46 and 47:
Priority setting to plan future rev
- Page 48 and 49:
Strategic Initiative SI 2. Sustaina
- Page 50 and 51:
Strategic Initiative SI 4. Stress t
- Page 52 and 53:
Strategic Initiative SI 7. Nutritio
- Page 54 and 55:
Partnership principles While the pa
- Page 56 and 57:
Based on current staff and partner
- Page 58 and 59:
Oversight Committee: This committee
- Page 60 and 61:
Review and refine priorities, targe
- Page 62 and 63:
Price Trade Policy REDD, PES, Reser
- Page 64 and 65:
CGIAR Research Program Outputs from
- Page 66 and 67:
Climate change strategy The impact
- Page 68 and 69:
Process monitoring will include par
- Page 70 and 71:
Given the high costs and difficulti
- Page 72 and 73:
the uptake of outputs and the inten
- Page 74 and 75:
CIMMYT has developed such partnersh
- Page 76 and 77:
12. Decision makers understand and
- Page 78 and 79:
Scaling up and out of methodologies
- Page 80 and 81:
Bilateral funding: Following the Co
- Page 82 and 83:
Table 7A. Income and expenses for S
- Page 84 and 85:
Expenses by Strategic Initiative: T
- Page 86 and 87:
References Alston, M.J., Norton, W.
- Page 88 and 89:
MAIZE Strategic Initiatives Strateg
- Page 90 and 91:
Targeting resource‐poor farmers i
- Page 92 and 93:
Knowledge of the structure and func
- Page 94 and 95:
2014: Analysis of policy options an
- Page 96 and 97:
Strategic Initiative 2. Sustainable
- Page 98 and 99:
stress‐tolerant germplasm, better
- Page 100 and 101:
Researchable issues Effective appr
- Page 102 and 103:
Key milestones 2011: Maize‐based
- Page 104 and 105:
Modernizing agriculture through use
- Page 106 and 107:
coherent exploratory diagnostic tri
- Page 108 and 109:
universities, the private sector (i
- Page 110 and 111:
What's new in this initiative? To
- Page 112 and 113:
Strategic Initiative 4. Stress‐to
- Page 114 and 115:
(mycotoxins) also contaminate grain
- Page 116 and 117:
CIMMYT and IITA breeding programs a
- Page 118 and 119:
Institutional weaknesses affecting
- Page 120 and 121:
Research and development partners C
- Page 122 and 123:
What's new in this initiative? Dro
- Page 124 and 125:
Gerpacio, R.V. and Pingali, P.L. 20
- Page 126 and 127:
gain per year. The physiological ba
- Page 128 and 129: Intellectual property management of
- Page 130 and 131: Other producer‐ or consumer‐rel
- Page 132 and 133: considered “women’s” crops, a
- Page 134 and 135: subtropical, mid‐altitude, transi
- Page 136 and 137: mycotoxin monitoring capacity of re
- Page 138 and 139: 4. Hubs and protocols to phenotype
- Page 140 and 141: Assuming that low‐cost storage fa
- Page 142 and 143: Mugo, S., Likhayo, P., Karaya, H.,
- Page 144 and 145: More than two‐thirds of the globa
- Page 146 and 147: Commercial QPM seed is currently av
- Page 148 and 149: Outputs 1. High‐throughput and lo
- Page 150 and 151: Linkages with other SIs SI 7 will m
- Page 152 and 153: Meenakshi JV, Johnson N, Manyong V,
- Page 154 and 155: Compared with the genomes of other
- Page 156 and 157: Breeding programs will achieve more
- Page 158 and 159: Strategic Initiative 9. New tools a
- Page 160 and 161: Through collaboration among CIMMYT,
- Page 162 and 163: o Generating predictive power of ha
- Page 164 and 165: generated from CIMMYT and IITA bree
- Page 166 and 167: Strategic Initiatives 1-9. Summary
- Page 168 and 169: Techniques of good quality seed pro
- Page 170 and 171: Annex 1. Population, poor and maize
- Page 172 and 173: Bolivia, CIF Botswana, Department A
- Page 174 and 175: Swaziland, Ministry of Agriculture
- Page 176 and 177: India, Meerut, Sardar Vallabah Bhai
- Page 180 and 181: Annex 3. Impact pathways for MAIZE:
- Page 182 and 183: Main outputs of MAIZE SIs 4. Instit
- Page 184: Annex 4. CIMMYT maize mega‐enviro