universidade de sÃ£o paulo - Faculdade de Odontologia - Unesp

More documents

Recommendations

Info

111 5.0 Log (cel/mm2) 4.0 3.0 2.0 * as ps 1.0 0.0 Control Ar/50 W AAt/130 W Groups Figure 1
112 Figure Caption Figure 1. Mean log numbers (cells/mm 2 ) and 95% confi<strong>de</strong>nce intervals for all groups. as: absence of saliva; ps: presence of saliva. (*) Statistically different mean compared to control.
Page 1 and 2:
UNIVERSIDADE ESTADUAL PAULISTA “J
Page 3 and 4:
iii Dados Curriculares Camila Andra
Page 5 and 6:
v exemplos, de quem eu me orgulho m
Page 7 and 8:
vii Agradecimentos Especiais Muito
Page 9 and 10:
ix mais novo”! Se eu pudesse, tor
Page 11 and 12:
xi Aos meus amigos de turma do curs
Page 13 and 14:
xiii À Capes (Coordenação de Ape
Page 15 and 16:
Sumário Resumo....................
Page 17 and 18:
ii alterações significantes nos v
Page 19:
ii adherence of Candida albicans, e
Page 22 and 23:
21 como: não eliminação do micro
Page 24 and 25:
23 mais hidrofóbica a superfície,
Page 26:
25 2008), resultando em uma superf
Page 30 and 31:
3 Capítulos 3.1 Capítulo 1 Adhere
Page 32 and 33:
31 Introduction The inability of cu
Page 34 and 35:
33 negatively charged surfaces 22 .
Page 36 and 37:
35 Plasma Treatments After roughnes
Page 38 and 39:
37 measurements were performed in a
Page 40 and 41:
39 was prepared in acetone at 0.4 m
Page 42 and 43:
41 forces, the development of the m
Page 44 and 45:
43 adherence observed in the presen
Page 46 and 47:
45 effect 27,30,42-44 or decreased
Page 48 and 49:
47 3 Yildirim MS, Hasanreisoglu U,
Page 50 and 51:
49 of Thai silk treated by SF 6 pla
Page 52 and 53:
51 33 Taylor R, Maryan C, Verran J.
Page 54 and 55:
53 47 Waters MGJ, Williams DW, Jagg
Page 56 and 57:
55 Table 2 - Means and standard dev
Page 58 and 59:
Figure 2 57
Page 60 and 61:
3.2 Capítulo 2 Evaluation of funga
Page 62 and 63: 61 adhering to denture surfaces [1]
Page 64 and 65: 63 mimicking the tissue-fitting sur
Page 66 and 67: 65 spectroscopy analysis (XPS), car
Page 68 and 69: 67 suspension was added to each wel
Page 70 and 71: 69 Initial adherence of Candida alb
Page 72 and 73: 71 increase probably occurred by me
Page 74 and 75: 73 to the adsorption of salivary pr
Page 76 and 77: 75 3) For all groups evaluated, no
Page 78 and 79: 77 12. Pereira-Cenci T, Cury AADB,
Page 80 and 81: 79 25. Ramage G, Tomsett K, Wickes
Page 82 and 83: 81 38. Nikawa H, Hayashi S, Nikawa
Page 84 and 85: 83 Tables Table 1 - Means and stand
Page 86 and 87: 85 Figures Figure 1
Page 88 and 89: 87 Figure Legends Figure 1 - XPS an
Page 90 and 91: 89 Abstract Candida adhesion to pol
Page 92 and 93: 91 to acrylic surfaces of Candida g
Page 94 and 95: 93 minutes. The denture base acryli
Page 96 and 97: 95 average was calculated. Specimen
Page 98 and 99: 97 Statistical Analysis Differences
Page 100 and 101: 99 the C. glabrata adhesion. The me
Page 102 and 103: 101 One other important observation
Page 104 and 105: 103 6. Minagi S, Miyake Y, Inagaki
Page 106 and 107: 105 19. Nikawa H, Hayashi S, Nikawa
Page 108 and 109: 107 33. Polukoshko KM, Brudvik JS,
Page 110 and 111: 109 Tables Table 1 - Means and stan
Page 114 and 115: 3.4 Capítulo 4 Effect of different
Page 116 and 117: 115 Introduction The presence of Ca
Page 118 and 119: 117 Italy) measuring 13.8 X 2 mm we
Page 120 and 121: 119 4 - 6 ºC during the experiment
Page 122 and 123: 121 Candida adhesion to dentures, a
Page 124 and 125: 123 absorbance values obtained afte
Page 126 and 127: 125 1. Silva WJ, Seneviratne J, Par
Page 128 and 129: 127 14. Karaagaclioglu L, Can G, Yi
Page 130 and 131: 129 28. Hahnel S, Rosentritt M, Han
Page 132 and 133: 131 Tables Table 1 Table 1 - Median
Page 134 and 135: 3.5 Capítulo 5 The effect of human
Page 136 and 137: 135 Introduction An important step
Page 138 and 139: 137 albicans adhesion to a denture
Page 140 and 141: 139 For group G 3 , whole human uns
Page 142 and 143: 141 each specimen, using a light mi
Page 144 and 145: 143 was collected from one donor or
Page 146 and 147: 145 In conclusion, this study focus
Page 148 and 149: 147 11. Edgerton M, Scannapieco FA,
Page 150 and 151: 149 24. Thein ZM, Samaranayake YH,
Page 152 and 153: 151 37. Zamperini CA, Machado AL, V
Page 154 and 155: 153 Figures Figure 1 *
Page 156: 155 Figure Legends Figure 1. Mean a
Page 159 and 160: 158 significantemente menores quand
Page 161 and 162: 160 diminuindo os valores de ângul
Page 163 and 164:
162 Nos estudos apresentados nos ca
Page 165 and 166:
164 pela coloração cristal violet
Page 167 and 168:
166 Diferentemente dos resultados o
Page 170:
5 Conclusão Dentro das limitaçõe
Page 173 and 174:
172 6. Bürgers R, Hahnel S, Reiche
Page 175 and 176:
174 22. Hodak SK, Supasai T, Paosaw
Page 177 and 178:
176 40. Nikawa H, Chen J, Hamada T,
Page 179 and 180:
178 56. Pusateri CR, Monaco EA, Edg
Page 181 and 182:
180 73. Tari BF, Nalbant D, Al DF,
Page 184 and 185:
7 Anexos Anexo 1
Page 186 and 187:
Anexo 3
Page 188 and 189:
Anexo 5
Page 190 and 191:
Anexo 7
Page 193 and 194:
8 Apêndice Apêndice 1 Os resultad
Page 195 and 196:
194 Tabela 3A - Grupo submetido ao
Page 197 and 198:
Page 199 and 200:
Page 201 and 202:
Page 203 and 204:
Apêndice 2 Os resultados obtidos d
Page 205 and 206:
Page 207 and 208:
Page 209 and 210:
Page 211 and 212:
Page 213 and 214:
Page 215 and 216:
Page 217 and 218:
Page 219 and 220:
Page 221 and 222:
Page 223 and 224:
Page 225 and 226:
224 Os resultados obtidos durante a
Page 227:
Autorizo a reprodução deste traba
show all

universidade de sÃ£o paulo - Faculdade de Odontologia - Unesp

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?