02.05.2015 Views

MnrAq

MnrAq

MnrAq

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

110 Third IMO GHG Study 2014<br />

Table 50 – Specific fuel oil consumption (SFOC baseline ) of gas turbines, boiler and auxiliary engines used in<br />

this study as the basis to estimate dependency of SFOC as a function of load. Unit is grams of fuel used per<br />

power unit (g/kWh) (IVL, 2004)<br />

Engine type HFO MDO/MGO HSD<br />

Gas turbine 305 300 225<br />

Steam boiler 305 300 205<br />

Auxiliary<br />

engine<br />

225 225 195<br />

The values in Table 49 and Table 50 represent the lowest point in the SFOC/load curve illustrated in Figure 72.<br />

In this study each MDO engine is assumed to maintain a parabolic dependency on engine load, which has<br />

been applied to SSD/MSD/HSD engines. This approach is described further in Jalkanen et al. (2012). The<br />

changes of SFOC as a function of engine load are computed using the base values in Table 49 and a parabolic<br />

representation of changes over the whole engine load range.<br />

SFOC(load) = SFOC base × (0.455 × load 2 - 0.71 × load + 1.28) eq. (3)<br />

In equation (3), engine load range (0–1) adjusts the base value of SFOC and describes the SFOC as a function<br />

of the engine load. This provides a mechanism that will increase SFOC on low engine loads (see Table 49)<br />

and allow the energy-based (grams of emissions per grams of fuel) and power-based (grams of emissions per<br />

kWh used) emissions factors to be linked. Different curves are used for SSD, MSD and HSD, depending on the<br />

values in Table 49, but all diesel engines use identical load dependency across the whole load range (0–100%)<br />

in this study. The default engine tuning is assumed (SFOC lowest at 80% engine load) for all diesel engines<br />

because it was not possible to determine the low load optimizations from the IHS Fairplay data.<br />

Figure 73: Impact of engine load on brake-specific fuel consumption of various selected SSD,<br />

MSD and HSD engines (emissions factors by engine type)<br />

Figure 73 illustrates the change of SFOC as a function of engine load for a large two-stroke engine (31,620 kW,<br />

MAN 6S90MC-C8), two medium-size four-stroke engines (6,000 kW, Wärtsilä 6L46; 6,000 kW, MaK M43C)<br />

and a small four-stroke engine (1,700 kW, CAT 3512C HD). The methodology used in this study allows SFOC<br />

changes of approximately 28% above the optimum engine load range.<br />

Load dependency of SFOC in the case of a gas turbine<br />

There is only a limited amount of information available about the load dependency and fuel economy of gas<br />

turbines. In this study, gas turbine SFOC load dependency was not modelled.<br />

SFOC of auxiliary boilers<br />

In this study, a constant value of 305 g/kWh SFOC was used for auxiliary boilers.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!