MnrAq

List of figures
Page
Figure 1: Bottom-up CO 2 emissions from international shipping by ship type 2012 .......... 6
Figure 2:
Figure 3:
Figure 4:
Figure 5:
Figure 6:
Figure 7:
Figure 8:
Figure 9:
Figure 10:
Figure 11:
Figure 12:
Figure 13:
Figure 14:
Figure 15:
Figure 16:
Summary graph of annual fuel consumption broken down by ship type
and machinery component (main, auxiliary and boiler) 2012 ................... 7
CO 2 emissions by ship type (international shipping only)
calculated using the bottom-up method for all years (2007–2012) ............... 8
Summary graph of annual fuel use by all ships, estimated using
the top-down and bottom-up methods, showing Second IMO GHG Study 2009
estimates and uncertainty ranges. ....................................... 9
Summary graph of annual fuel use by international shipping,
estimated using the top-down and bottom-up methods, showing
Second IMO GHG Study 2009 estimates and uncertainty ranges ............... 9
Time series for trends in emissions and drivers of emissions
in the oil tanker fleet 2007–2012. All trends are indexed to their values
in 2007 .......................................................... 11
Time series for trends in emissions and drivers of emissions
in the container ship fleet 2007–2012. All trends are indexed to their values
in 2007 .......................................................... 12
Time series for trends in emissions and drivers of emissions
in the bulk carrier fleet 2007–2012. All trends are indexed to their values
in 2007 .......................................................... 12
Time series of bottom-up results for GHGs and other substances (all shipping).
The green bar represents the Second IMO GHG Study 2009 estimate ............ 16
Time series of bottom-up results for GHGs and other substances
(international shipping, domestic navigation and fishing) ...................... 17
Historical data to 2012 on global transport work for non-coal combined
bulk dry cargoes and other dry cargoes (billion tonne-miles)
coupled to projections driven by GDPs from SSP1 through to SSP5
by 2050 .......................................................... 18
Historical data to 2012 on global transport work for ship-transported coal
and liquid fossil fuels (billion tonne-miles) coupled to projections of coal and
energy demand driven by RCPs 2.6, 4.5, 6.0 and 8.5 by 2050 .................. 19
BAU projections of CO 2 emissions from international maritime transport
2012–2050 ........................................................ 20
Projections of CO 2 emissions from international maritime transport.
Bold lines are BAU scenarios. Thin lines represent either
greater efficiency improvement than BAU
or additional emissions controls or both .................................. 20
Projections of CO 2 emissions from international maritime transport under the
same demand projections. Larger improvements in efficiency have
a higher impact on CO 2 emissions than a larger share
of LNG in the fuel mix ............................................... 21
Geographical coverage in 2007 (top) and 2012 (bottom), coloured according
to the intensity of messages received per unit area.
This is a composite of both vessel activity and geographical coverage;
intensity is not solely indicative of vessel activity ............................ 24