02.05.2015 Views

MnrAq

MnrAq

MnrAq

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Annex 4 233<br />

Transfers category reporting<br />

Figure 22: World natural gas shipping sales, export-import discrepancy<br />

and statistical difference<br />

The IEA “Transfers” category “… comprises … products transferred and recycled products. Products transferred<br />

are intended for oil products imported for further processing in refineries. Recycled products are finished<br />

products, which pass a second time through the marketing network …”.<br />

Given this definition, the net balance of inter-product transfers cannot be checked if equal to zero; however,<br />

the net balance of “Transfers” may be an indicator of a potential maximum discrepancy in the net balance of<br />

inter-product transfers figure.<br />

We find that the world transfers balance also is greater than zero, meaning that net transfer statistics do not<br />

balance at the world scale – in other words, that additional fuel exists in the transfers data. If these transfers<br />

include significant volumes of fuel or other products that were later blended for marine bunkers, the statistical<br />

data could under-report marine bunkers consumption.<br />

Our assessment indicates that the additional uncertainty contributed by such an allocation error would increase<br />

the export-import adjustment by approximately 10% to approximately 20% since 1998. Figure 23 illustrates<br />

the comparative impact on uncertainty of the observed export-import discrepancy and the observed transfers<br />

balance discrepancy.<br />

Data accuracy<br />

The accuracy of the data depends on different statistical approach on data collection, reporting and validation.<br />

For example, Marland (2008) reports that:<br />

“… the United States national calculation of CO 2 emissions has an uncertainty (at the 95% confidence<br />

level) of -1% to 6%, and Environment Canada reported a comparable value of -4% to 0%. Olivier<br />

and Peters (2002) estimated that emissions from Organisation for Economic Co-operation and<br />

Development (OECD) countries might have – on average – an uncertainty of 5% to 10%, whereas the<br />

uncertainty may be 10% to 20% for other countries. The International Energy Agency did not report<br />

the uncertainty of its emissions estimates but relied on Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change<br />

(IPCC) methodologies and cited the IPCC estimate that ‘for countries with good energy collection<br />

systems, this [IPCC Tier I method] will result in an uncertainty range of ±5%. The uncertainty range<br />

in countries with “less well-developed energy data systems” may be on the order of ±10%.’”

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!