02.05.2015 Views

MnrAq

MnrAq

MnrAq

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Scenarios for shipping emissions 2012–2050 145<br />

Figure 88: Impact of productivity assumptions on emissions projections<br />

There are other ways of increasing productivity than increasing the average cargo load. When demand<br />

increases and the size of the fleet cannot keep up with the rising demand, a natural response is for ships to<br />

increase their speed. This also increases productivity. However, since fuel use and emissions per tonne-mile<br />

are roughly proportional to the square of the speed, a speed increase would result in emissions that are higher<br />

than emissions at constant productivity.<br />

In sum, our emissions projections are sensitive to our assumption that productivity will revert to its long-term<br />

average value without increasing emissions per ship. If productivity remains constant (because ships will<br />

continue to operate at their current load factors, with their current number of days at sea and at their current<br />

speed), emissions are likely to be 10% higher than projected. If productivity increases because ships increase<br />

their speed at sea, emissions are likely to increase by a higher amount.<br />

3.3.5 Uncertainty<br />

There are two sources of uncertainty in the scenarios. The first is that the estimates of emissions in the<br />

base year have an uncertainty range, which has been discussed in Section 1.5. As our emissions projection<br />

model calculated future emissions on the basis of base-year emissions and relative changes in parameters<br />

(discussed in Section 3.2), uncertainty in the base year carries forward into future years. The second source of<br />

uncertainty is that the future is, in itself, uncertain. This type of uncertainty is addressed by showing different<br />

scenarios. While the scenarios are stylized representations of the future, and have no uncertainty of their own,<br />

uncertainty is introduced by the fact that each of the BAU scenarios is equally likely to occur. Hence, on top<br />

of the uncertainty in the base-year emissions, there is uncertainty in future developments that increases over<br />

time.<br />

3.4 Main results<br />

Maritime emissions projections show an increase in fuel use and GHG emissions in the period up to 2050,<br />

despite significant regulatory and market-driven improvements in efficiency. Depending on future economic<br />

and energy developments, our BAU scenarios project an increase of 50%–250% in the period up to 2050.<br />

Further action on efficiency and emissions can mitigate emissions growth, although all scenarios but one<br />

project emissions in 2050 to be higher than in 2012. The main driver of the emissions increase is the projected<br />

rise in demand for maritime transport. This rise is most pronounced in scenarios that combine the sustained<br />

use of fossil fuels with high economic growth and is lower in scenarios that involve a transition to renewable<br />

energy sources or a more moderate growth pattern.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!