02.05.2015 Views

MnrAq

MnrAq

MnrAq

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Annex 7 287<br />

The following table presents the fuel mix scenarios used for the emissions projection.<br />

Table 58 – Fuel mix scenarios used for emissions projection (% m/m)<br />

High LNG case/extra ECAs LNG share Distillates and LSHFO* HFO<br />

2012 0% 15% 85%<br />

2020 10% 30% 60%<br />

2030 15% 35% 50%<br />

2050 25% 35% 40%<br />

Low LNG case/no extra ECAs LNG share Distillates and LSHFO* HFO<br />

2012 0% 15% 85%<br />

2020 2% 25% 73%<br />

2030 4% 25% 71%<br />

2050 8% 25% 67%<br />

* Sulphur content of 1% in 2012 and 0.5% from 2020.<br />

In both scenarios, we assume that the global 0.5% sulphur requirement will become effective in 2020. A later<br />

enforcement (2025) is accounted for in a sensitivity analysis.<br />

Also, in both scenarios we assume that in 2020, 60% of the fuel consumption of the fleet (in terms of tons)<br />

consists of HFO. In the scenario, where extra ECAs are assumed to be established, this share decreases over<br />

time, whereas in the other scenario it does not. The share of the distillates then follows.<br />

Emissions factors<br />

Emissions factors<br />

All emissions analysed here, except for HFC, PFC and SF 6 , result from fuel combustion and are therefore<br />

calculated by multiplying fuel consumption with an emissions factor. The emissions factors depend on the<br />

type of fuel, and we distinguish between residual fuel oil (HFO), low sulphur fuel oil (LSFO), marine gas<br />

oil (MGO, a distillate fuel) and LNG. Emissions factors may also be affected by engine modifications (e.g.<br />

exhaust gas recirculation (EGR)), or exhaust gas treatment (e.g. selective catalytic reduction (SCR) or sulphur<br />

scrubbers). Some of these technologies to reduce emissions have a fuel penalty; others, such as SCR, allow<br />

for optimization of the fuel-efficiency of the engine and may result in a fuel-efficiency improvement. The fuel<br />

penalties are typically in the order of a percent, while the possible improvements may be larger. We do not<br />

make assumptions about the specific ways in which ships meet standards and we ignore fuel penalties or<br />

efficiency improvements, as these are small relative to the inherent uncertainties in the emissions projections.<br />

Below, separate sections per species present the emissions factors in the base year and in future years.<br />

CO 2<br />

The emissions factors of CO 2 are expressed per tonne of fuel. For each fuel type, they remain constant over<br />

time. When calculating the emissions of LNG engines, we take into account that the brake-specific fuel oil<br />

consumption (SFOC) of LNG is 15% lower than the SFOC of HFO.<br />

Table 59 – CO 2 emissions factors (g/g fuel)<br />

Region<br />

Fuel type<br />

Year<br />

2012 2030 2050<br />

Global HFO 3,114 3,114 3,114<br />

LSFO 3,114 3,114 3,114<br />

MGO 3,206 3,206 3,206<br />

LNG 2,750 2,750 2,750

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!