31.05.2015 Views

NcXHF

NcXHF

NcXHF

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

INTEGRATING ICD-10 IN YOUR PRACTICE<br />

ICD-10 recognizes distinctions in clinical conditions and severity<br />

that can help segment patient populations within a disease<br />

category. ICD-10 offers opportunities for improved,<br />

automated identifıcation, stratifıcation, and segmentation of<br />

patient populations. With greater code specifıcity, better algorithms<br />

can be developed to identify and target-specifıc<br />

patient populations and subpopulations for disease management<br />

programs and customize programs for patients with<br />

differences in severity or risk. Target groups’ progress toward<br />

goals and effectiveness of treatment can be monitored<br />

through the clinical and severity distinctions in ICD-10<br />

codes. As more ICD-10 data is collected and additional<br />

ICD-10 experience is gained, prediction models can be<br />

greatly enhanced to more accurately predict risk within populations<br />

by a number of refıned parameters. Superior data<br />

will improve the ability to evaluate the effectiveness of disease<br />

management programs in improving patient outcomes, reducing<br />

the incidence of acute episodes, and decreasing health<br />

care costs.<br />

Ultimately benefıting patients, better data will support:<br />

• Improvements in patient outcomes and patient safety<br />

through better data for analysis and research<br />

• Improved ability to manage chronic diseases by better<br />

capturing patient populations<br />

• More accurate reflection of patients’ clinical complexity<br />

and severity of illness<br />

• Improved ability to identify high-risk patients who require<br />

more intensive resources<br />

• Improved ability to manage population health<br />

• Improved information sharing, which can enhance<br />

treatment accuracy and improve care coordination<br />

• Improved ability to assess effectiveness and safety of new<br />

medical technology<br />

• Improved diagnosis of chronic illness and identifıcation<br />

of underlying causes, complications of diseases, and conditions<br />

that contribute to disease complexity<br />

• More accurate reflection of clinical complexity and severity<br />

of illness<br />

• Increased patient engagement<br />

Complete and accurate data must be reported to put the<br />

most appropriate picture of the quality of care delivery in<br />

front of increasingly sophisticated and informed potential<br />

patients. With better data will come an expanded ability to<br />

educate consumers on costs and outcomes of treatment options.<br />

Increased patient understanding and involvement in<br />

their health care will improve the population’s health and decrease<br />

the cost of health care.<br />

ICD-10 BENEFITS FOR CLINICIANS<br />

The transition to ICD-10 also benefıts clinicians. Compared<br />

with ICD-9-CM, medical terminology and classifıcation of<br />

diseases are more consistent with current clinical practice<br />

and medical knowledge (e.g., newly recognized conditions<br />

are identifıed and conditions with a recently discovered etiology<br />

have been reclassifıed). Many physician specialty societies<br />

have actively contributed to the clinical content of ICD-<br />

10-CM/PCS and continue to be involved in the annual<br />

updating process to ensure the code sets represent current<br />

clinical knowledge. The increased specifıcity will provide better<br />

justifıcation of medical necessity for treatment and diagnostic<br />

tests. Exchange of patients’ clinical information will be<br />

more effıcient. Better data on patients’ clinical conditions will<br />

help to validate reported evaluation and management codes<br />

and result in less misinterpretation by auditors, attorneys,<br />

other third parties. More detailed data facilitates the informed<br />

use of both business intelligence and clinical dashboards.<br />

Business intelligence dashboards make performance<br />

and trend data more readily available and, thus, facilitate attainment<br />

of meaningful use criteria. Clinical dashboards<br />

have the potential to drive better care paths and achieve better<br />

clinical outcomes.<br />

The increased granularity of ICD-10 will enable more directed<br />

clinical decision support. When a patient has multiple<br />

medical conditions or manifestations of a condition, the failure<br />

of clinical decision support to take into account all of the<br />

patient’s clinical factors can result in: (1) lack of oversight or<br />

specifıc monitoring of manifestations and (2) medication<br />

protocols and their effect on the patient during and after<br />

treatment. The ability to fully leverage clinical decision support<br />

tools will help direct clinician monitoring to avoid complications<br />

or adverse drug events.<br />

In an accountable care environment, providers need to assume<br />

an essential role in determining and prioritizing those<br />

services that offer the greatest benefıt in the context of fınancial<br />

constraints. Models that allow providers who are part of<br />

integrated delivery systems to take on the risk of care delivery<br />

and share the rewards of high-quality, effıcient care are continuing<br />

to evolve. The ability of ICD-10 to provide better detail<br />

to defıne risk, severity, anatomic detail, comorbidities,<br />

complications, disease phases, sequelae, and other key parameters<br />

of the patient’s health state will be critically important<br />

in effectively managing patients and benefıting from<br />

effıcient care delivery. 5<br />

The move to ICD-10 will also lead to increased administrative<br />

effıciencies and, thus, lower administrative costs. These<br />

reduced administrative costs come from improved coding<br />

accuracy and productivity, fewer pended or denied reimbursement<br />

claims because of more information provided by<br />

the submitted codes, and fewer payer requests for submission<br />

of supporting medical record documentation (because of<br />

more detailed information provided by the codes). The increased<br />

specifıcity, representation of current clinical knowledge,<br />

and use of more up-to-date medical terminology will<br />

make ICD-10 codes easier to assign than ICD-9-CM codes.<br />

In the long-term, after the learning curve has ended, it is expected<br />

that the use of ICD-10 will result in fewer coding errors<br />

than ICD-9-CM because ICD-10 is less ambiguous and<br />

more logically organized. The ambiguity in ICD-9-CM and<br />

use of outdated terminology that does not correspond to<br />

terms used in clinical documentation makes ICD-9-CM confusing,<br />

diffıcult to use, and open to misinterpretation. The<br />

increased specifıcity in ICD-10 will also facilitate the development<br />

of more sophisticated automated coding tools to as-<br />

asco.org/edbook | 2015 ASCO EDUCATIONAL BOOK<br />

e97

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!