31.05.2015 Views

NcXHF

NcXHF

NcXHF

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

DAVID I. MARKS<br />

TABLE 1. Prospective Studies of Acute Lymphoblastic<br />

Leukemia in Patients Older Than Age 54<br />

Author<br />

Complete Remission<br />

Rate (%)<br />

Median Survival<br />

(Months)<br />

Kantarjian 1994 65 11<br />

Bassan 1996 59 9<br />

Delannaoy 1997 85 14<br />

Delannaoy 2002 58 9<br />

Offidiani 2003 73 Not stated<br />

KEY POINTS<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

Older patients with ALL require an individualized<br />

assessment of comorbidities and therapy adapted to their<br />

performance status, disease response, and personal<br />

treatment goals. Newer targeted therapies are likely to<br />

play a larger role.<br />

Optimal postremission therapies in older patients are<br />

unknown as are their effects on quality of life and in<br />

maintaining complete remission (CR). Reduced intensity<br />

conditioning (RIC) allografting in fit patients who have<br />

responded well to therapy and have high-quality donors<br />

deserves further exploration.<br />

Arguably, older patients with Philadelphia-positive (Ph-pos)<br />

ALL have better outcomes than older patients with Phnegative<br />

disease. This patient group can reliably achieve<br />

CR with vincristine, steroids, and a tyrosine kinase inhibitor<br />

(TKI) with minimal toxicity. Medium-term survival can be<br />

achieved in many older patients with gentle maintenance<br />

therapy and a TKI. Using a different agent at relapse may<br />

prolong survival.<br />

Internationally, ALL investigators need to target this<br />

neglected group of patients by opening clinical trials that<br />

ask questions aimed at improving survival and the quality<br />

of that survival. Physicians who manage these patients are<br />

urged to enter patients into these clinical trials so that we<br />

can learn which therapy can be tolerated and is most<br />

efficacious. These basic studies would provide the<br />

background data that will enable study of newer targeted<br />

therapies that have less marrow and extramedullary<br />

toxicity.<br />

should be stopped, if possible. Nutrition is a major issue; all<br />

older patients should be seen by a dietitian and their diets<br />

proactively managed.<br />

One of the key treatment decisions in this age group is<br />

whether an older patient can safely receive conventional<br />

doses of anthracycline. A baseline echocardiogram with estimation<br />

of ejection fraction is essential. However, many patients<br />

will have had a past history of ischemic heart disease or<br />

abnormal echocardiograms. Cardiac arrhythmias are common<br />

pretreatment (and during induction) and may require<br />

cardiac consultation and a change in therapeutic strategy. Liposomal<br />

daunorubicin deserves further testing and liposomal<br />

vincristine may result in less autonomic neuropathy.<br />

GOALS OF THERAPY AND PHILOSOPHY<br />

OF TREATMENT<br />

Progress in ALL in older patients has been inhibited by a lack<br />

of systematic prospective trials and a lack of consensus about<br />

the goals of therapy. Only a small percentage of older patients<br />

are enrolled in trials, 5 and these patients may not represent<br />

the entire group. Prospective studies of older patients show<br />

CR rates that range from 30% to greater than 70%, but median<br />

survivals generally less than a year. Some studies using a<br />

less aggressive treatment intent showed similar survival.<br />

Their data may be informing us that one treatment does not<br />

fıt all: that some are suitable for treatment with curative intent<br />

but many are not.<br />

Intensive, prolonged inpatient chemotherapy, with high<br />

toxicity and a substantial NRM, can only be justifıed in this<br />

age group within the context of a clinical trial or if there is a<br />

signifıcant chance of at least medium term survival.<br />

HOVON<br />

The fairly small-scale data by the HOVON group highlights<br />

the uncertainties of how to manage this disease. 9 In 24 patients<br />

age 61 to 70 (who were undoubtedly highly selected),<br />

79% achieved CR, and overall survival at 3 years was a remarkable<br />

50%. However, the price for these results was 21%<br />

induction mortality. Patients and physicians might accept<br />

this NRM as it was accompanied by a realistic chance of<br />

medium-term survival. Three of the 24 patients underwent<br />

an allogeneic transplant.<br />

POTENTIAL ROLE OF MINIMUM RESIDUAL<br />

DISEASE<br />

Eligibility for the United Kingdom ALL XIV trial is for people<br />

age 65 or younger, although patients older than age 60<br />

who are less fıt may be entered onto the United Kingdom<br />

elderly patient trial (ALL 60). There are few prospective<br />

minimum residual disease (MRD) data in the age 60 or older<br />

group.<br />

Of the 19 patients older than age 60 analyzed so far, only<br />

three were MRD negative after phase I, but fıve of 16 were<br />

negative after phase II (Zakout, unpublished data) with some<br />

additional patients being very low-level positive. This shows<br />

that intensively treated older patients can be rendered MRD<br />

negative. How to use this very limited information is uncertain.<br />

MRD-positive patients, depending on their clinical<br />

well-being, could be informed of the result and given the<br />

choice of therapy to attempt to render them MRD negative or<br />

to receive more gentle palliative treatment.<br />

Patients who are MRD-negative, on the other hand, would<br />

be candidates for RIC allografts, further intensive chemotherapy,<br />

or possibly even an autograft. We need further MRD<br />

e344<br />

2015 ASCO EDUCATIONAL BOOK | asco.org/edbook

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!