31.05.2015 Views

NcXHF

NcXHF

NcXHF

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

INDUSTRY AND ONCOLOGY<br />

has been “lackadaisical.” 21 Notably, the United States is one The ethical implications of DTC advertising are complex. 42<br />

of only two countries in the world that permits such advertising.<br />

Furthermore, a recent paper from the other country being, and distributive justice by informing and empowering<br />

On one hand, advertising may promote autonomy, well-<br />

that permits such advertising—New Zealand—calls for that patients, improving quality of care, and promoting responsiveness<br />

to patients’ needs and values. 43-45 This is most likely<br />

country’s policy to be reviewed, since such advertising “exposes<br />

patients to unnecessary adverse effects and iatrogenic when the advertisement is not itself disguised in educational<br />

programming or celebrity interviews, 46 when the<br />

harm, and increases costs for the health care sector through<br />

the prescription of expensive branded medication.” 22<br />

product being advertised has clear indications, and when a<br />

Although direct-to-consumer advertising may be protected<br />

by a constitutional right to free speech in the United vise the patient and correct any misunderstandings. On<br />

physician without industry relationships is available to ad-<br />

States, 23 the U.S. Constitution would presumably not prohibit<br />

requirements analogous to those included in the Sun-<br />

even disruption of the physician–patient relationship. 47,48<br />

the other hand, advertising may also lead to confusion and<br />

shine Act and the Final Rule regarding transparency reports The very statement, “Ask your doctor about X” implies<br />

of relationships between companies and health care providers.<br />

For example, Congress could require public dissemina-<br />

information, potentially jeopardizing patients’ trust in<br />

that one’s doctor requires a prompt to provide necessary<br />

tion (e.g., in a database) of the costs of drugs marketed their physicians. As noted above, DTC advertising has direct<br />

costs, and it can also increase the costs of the health<br />

directly to consumers, as well as the overall costs of the marketing<br />

and advertising of such drugs. In addition, Congress care encounter or cause harm by distracting from other,<br />

could also require that all print ads aimed at a consumer audience<br />

include detailed information about drug costs, given<br />

more appropriate subjects for discussion.<br />

Although there is some evidence that DTC advertising may<br />

the increasing importance of fınancial toxicity related to expensive<br />

drugs. 24 Similarly, television and radio ads could also<br />

improve patient education and physician–patient communication<br />

necessary for truly shared decision making—and it<br />

be required to devote adequate time (e.g., 15 seconds) to discussing<br />

this increasingly important issue, with the goal of re-<br />

might even help mitigate health disparities by encouraging<br />

patients of low socioeconomic status to seek care—the primary<br />

goal of advertising is to increase utilization.<br />

ducing demand for expensive drugs that may be only<br />

marginally better than much cheaper alternatives.<br />

49,50 One<br />

study found a 1% increase in prescription drug spending for<br />

every 10% increase in DTC advertising. 51 In some circumstances,<br />

this increased use may be appropriate, such as that<br />

DIRECT-TO-CONSUMER ADVERTISING<br />

observed in one study of the effect of aromatase inhibitor advertisements.<br />

Since 1962, the FDA has had regulatory authority over prescription<br />

drug advertising. 25 Although professionals have<br />

52 Nevertheless, to avoid the possibility that advertising<br />

might compromise health care quality by leading to<br />

historically been the primary target of advertisements, DTC<br />

overuse or misuse (rather than correction of underuse), the<br />

advertising began as early as the 1980s, primarily in print<br />

form. DTC advertising expanded dramatically after 1997,<br />

physician’s role as an unbiased intermediary and counselor is<br />

when the FDA issued draft guidance on broadcast advertisements<br />

26 that was later fınalized in 1999. 27 Industry spent ap-<br />

critical. 53 Unfortunately, the proliferation of ties between<br />

physicians and industry discussed above can compromise<br />

proximately $150 million on DTC advertising in 1993, which<br />

physicians’ ability to play this important role. 54 DTC advertising<br />

is particularly problematic when coupled with<br />

rose to $1.1 billion by 1997, reached $3.2 billion by 2003,<br />

peaked at $4.9 billion in 2007 (also the peak of overall promotional<br />

spending for pharmaceutical products), and was terpretation.<br />

the absence of an unconflicted provider to help in its in-<br />

$3.9 billion in 2011. 28,29<br />

As detailed in other sections of this manuscript, industry<br />

DTC advertising has substantial influence on medical practice<br />

and affects drug utilization. 30-34 A public survey revealed as unbiased intermediaries are broad in range and scope. Re-<br />

relationships that can affect the ability of physicians to serve<br />

that 30% of respondents had initiated conversations with cent regulations to mandate disclosure have stemmed from<br />

their physicians about a medicine they saw advertised, and, of the recognition that industry was increasingly offering physicians<br />

not only samples, gifts, dinners, and junkets, but also<br />

these, 44% reported actually receiving a prescription for the<br />

drug as the outcome of the conversation. 35 Many DTC advertisements<br />

target patients with cancer, 36 and a survey found speakers’ bureau membership, ghostwriting services, and<br />

consulting fees, honoraria for speaking engagements and<br />

that 86.2% of oncology patients reported awareness of such substantial fınancial support for research. 55,56 Although the<br />

ads. 37 In another survey, 94% of oncology nurse practitioners bias that results from this entanglement with industry may be<br />

reported having received medication requests prompted by unintentional and unconscious, and most physicians fırmly<br />

DTC ads, and 40% indicated that they received one to fıve believe that they themselves cannot be influenced in this way,<br />

such requests per week. 38 DTC advertising relevant to oncology<br />

extends well beyond the marketing of prescription drugs, an effect. 57 Thus, although ethical concerns about the poten-<br />

considerable evidence suggests that such ties do indeed have<br />

to include advertising for genetic testing and medical imaging—other<br />

industries with which physicians often have of concerns related to DTC advertising, they take on heighttial<br />

effect of these relationships exist even outside the context<br />

ties. 39-41 ened importance in this light. 58<br />

asco.org/edbook | 2015 ASCO EDUCATIONAL BOOK 133

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!