31.05.2015 Views

NcXHF

NcXHF

NcXHF

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

CHEMOTHERAPY FOR PATIENTS WITH BMOC<br />

rate in platinum-sensitive patients was reported as 29% to<br />

36%. 34,35 A second piece of clinical data has suggested a correlation<br />

between BRCA1/2-mutation status and the improved effıcacy<br />

of trabectedin/PLD over PLD alone in a subgroup analysis<br />

of 41 patients in the OVA-301 trial. This observation may merit<br />

further exploration of that combination. 36<br />

Clinical data on smaller numbers of patients were reported in<br />

support of preclinical results suggesting increased sensitivity to<br />

other DNA-damaging agents such as mitomycin-C 37 and melphalan<br />

38 for BRCA1/2-defıciency. Moiseyenko et al recently reported<br />

that administration of mitomycin-C (10 mg/m 2 , 4 doses<br />

per week), which induces DNA cross-links, resulted in one CR<br />

(duration 36 weeks), two PRs (duration 36 and 48 weeks) and six<br />

instances of disease stabilization of between 12 to 24 weeks duration<br />

in patients with BMOC with recurrent disease. 26 Melphalan<br />

is a bifunctional alkylating agent that induces inter- and<br />

intrastrand DNA cross-links. It has been shown to be selectively<br />

toxic to BRCA2-defıcient breast cancer cell lines. 38 Single doses<br />

of melphalan also have resulted in longer relapse-free survival in<br />

mice xenografted with BRCA2-defıcient cells than with cisplatin<br />

or olaparib in vivo. 38 Osher et al reported a case of a patient who<br />

was a BRCA2 mutation carrier with platinum-resistant EOC<br />

who responded to treatment with oral melphalan (8 mg per day,<br />

5 days per month for 1 year) and has remained disease-free for<br />

more than 25 years. 27<br />

Paclitaxel is a well-established therapeutic agent for treating<br />

patients with EOC in the fırst-line 39 and relapsed settings.<br />

40 In the context of patients with BMOC, however, the<br />

sensitivity of BRCA1-mutated cancer cells to platinum chemotherapy<br />

has been reported to correlate inversely with sensitivity<br />

to microtubule-interfering agents such as taxanes. 41<br />

Furthermore, inhibition of BRCA1-expression in ovarian cancer<br />

cell lines has shown to increase cellular sensitivity to platinum<br />

compounds but reduce antitumor activity of taxanes. 42,43<br />

Clinical data were also provided to suggest that overall survival<br />

for patients with higher BRCA1-expressing ovarian cancers improved<br />

following taxane-containing chemotherapy, albeit nonsignifıcantly<br />

(23.0 vs. 18.2 months; p 0.12; HR, 0.53), 42 thus<br />

suggesting that higher BRCA1-expression levels may be required<br />

for a clinical response to taxanes. In vitro data suggest<br />

that BRCA1-mutated breast cancer cells are resistant to paclitaxel,<br />

in contrast to BRCA1 wild-type cells, 44 and MCF-7 cells<br />

transfected with BRCA1 siRNA display a signifıcant 9-fold increase<br />

in resistance to paclitaxel (p 0.001). 45 Taken together,<br />

these data imply that patients with BMOC who harbor defects in<br />

BRCA1/2 function through germ-line or sporadic mutations<br />

also may be potentially resistant to paclitaxel. 43 However, conflicting<br />

preclinical published studies indicate reduced BRCA1<br />

expression actually may confer increased sensitivity to paclitaxel.<br />

46,47 In this context, a study by Tan et al of 26 patients with<br />

BMOC who received paclitaxel monotherapy for relapsed disease<br />

described an overall response rate of 46% (12 of 26 patients).<br />

21 The clinical benefıt rate (defıned as RECIST PR or CR,<br />

or stable disease after 18 weeks of treatment) was signifıcantly<br />

higher (80 vs. 36%, p 0.04) in patients who are platinum sensitive<br />

than in patients who are platinum resistant. 21 These data<br />

do not suggest any adverse effect of BRCA1/2 mutation carrier<br />

status on the activity of paclitaxel. The study also showed that<br />

patients with BMOC who were platinum sensitive had signifıcantly<br />

longer median PFS compared with patients who were<br />

platinum resistant (42 vs. 21 weeks, p 0.003). 21 In the retrospective<br />

study by Safra et al, PFS for patients with BMOC<br />

following paclitaxel monotherapy was not signifıcantly different<br />

from that of patients who are non-BMOC (p <br />

0.572). 30 Overall, the data suggest that equivalent paclitaxel<br />

effıcacy is seen in both groups of patients, and taxanes should<br />

continue to have a therapeutic role in patients with EOC regardless<br />

of BRCA1/2 carrier status.<br />

ARE THERE ANY CHEMOTHERAPY COMBINATION<br />

DATA IN THIS CONTEXT?<br />

In a retrospective single-institute review of 256 patients, the<br />

combination of PLD and platinum or gemcitabine and platinum<br />

was associated with signifıcantly improved PFS in patients<br />

with BMOC compared with patients who are non-BMOC (p <br />

0.001 and p 0.02, respectively); however, there were no differences<br />

in outcome when taxanes were used in combination with<br />

platinum. 30 As such, it is tempting to speculate that a PLD/platinum<br />

combination potentially may be a better option than a taxane/platinum<br />

combination at some stage of treatment for<br />

patients with BMOC. However, no prospective comparative<br />

data presently support this. The two randomized trials that<br />

compared their effıcacy in the fırst-line (MITO-2 trial) 48 and recurrent<br />

(CALYPSO trial) 49 settings did not include subgroup<br />

analyses of patients with BMOC vs. patients who are non-<br />

BMOC. There is a good case, however, to retrieve samples in<br />

these trials for BRCA1/2-mutation testing.<br />

HOW SHOULD PATIENTS WITH BMOC BE TREATED<br />

AT PRESENT?<br />

First-Line Chemotherapy for Patients with BMOC<br />

In recurrent disease, the retrospective data appear to suggest<br />

that PLD may be superior to paclitaxel as a single agent, but<br />

the situation for carboplatin-based combinations in fırst-line<br />

treatment may be quite different. Although some may consider<br />

the option of PLD/carboplatin as the fırst-line treatment<br />

of choice in newly diagnosed patients with BMOC,<br />

there are no randomized data to support this approach. Data<br />

from the JGOG3016 study demonstrating signifıcantly superior<br />

PFS and OS outcomes when carboplatin is combined<br />

with dose-dense weekly paclitaxel instead of thrice weekly<br />

paclitaxel also should be taken into account (PFS, p 0.0037;<br />

OS, p 0.039). 50 Therefore, although the PLD/carboplatin<br />

combination represents a viable alternative to the current<br />

standard of paclitaxel/carboplatin in patients with BMOC<br />

who wish to reduce the risk of neuropathy, which is in line<br />

with the data from MITO-2, 48 there are currently no data to<br />

support dropping paclitaxel routinely from fırst-line chemotherapy<br />

for patients with BMOC.<br />

asco.org/edbook | 2015 ASCO EDUCATIONAL BOOK 117

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!