31.05.2015 Views

NcXHF

NcXHF

NcXHF

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

GERIATRIC ONCOLOGY AND CLINICAL TRIALS<br />

Geriatric Oncology and Clinical Trials<br />

Stuart M. Lichtman, MD<br />

OVERVIEW<br />

The overall aging of the population has resulted in a marked increase in the number of older patients with cancer. These patients have<br />

specific needs that are different from those of the younger population. Cancer clinical trials have included an inadequate number of<br />

older patients, resulting in lack of meaningful data to make evidence-based decisions for this population. As a result, clinicians have<br />

to extrapolate data from younger and healthier patients. There are a number of reasons for this under-representation, including a<br />

design and implementation structure for clinical trials that does not meet the needs of this vulnerable population. Issues that need to<br />

be addressed include alterations in eligibility criteria to make them less restrictive by accounting for multiple comorbidities and prior<br />

malignancy and endpoints specific for older patients, such as quality of life, changes in function, and maintenance of independence.<br />

Other issues specific to the older population include alterations in dose-limiting toxicity, measures of treatment-related toxicity, and<br />

polypharmacy. Phase I trials can be appropriate for older patients but need to be tailored to their needs. Some form of geriatric<br />

assessment needs to be included to help with eligibility, assessment, and stratification. For future clinical trials to be truly meaningful<br />

they need to appropriately assess and incorporate the needs of the majority of the cancer population.<br />

The demographic shift and the resultant increase in the<br />

number of older patients with cancer, which was predicted<br />

by the founders of geriatric oncology (Dr. B.J. Kennedy,<br />

Dr. Rosemary Yancik, and others), has now arrived. It<br />

has long been recognized that the most signifıcant risk factor<br />

for the development of cancer is aging. Cancer and its treatment<br />

can affect the overall life expectancy, as well as the active<br />

life expectancy and function, of older individuals. The<br />

traditional study approach to cancer, with its focus on<br />

younger, healthier patients, has resulted in a lack of highquality<br />

data to adequately guide care for older patients. In<br />

1983, Dr. Yancik organized a symposium sponsored by the<br />

National Cancer Institute and the National Institute on Aging<br />

and published a monograph, “Perspectives on Prevention<br />

and Treatment of Cancer in the Elderly,” highlighting the importance<br />

of research in cancer and aging. 1 In the 1988 American<br />

Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) Presidential<br />

Address, Dr. Kennedy encouraged the study of aging and<br />

cancer. 2 He stated, “Our society need not ration how we will<br />

treat our disadvantaged members, but should continue to<br />

seek those preventive and positive measures that can shorten<br />

our later period of morbidity. A very major cancer load will<br />

persist well into the 21st century, even if the attempts at prevention<br />

are eventually a total success. There is a developing<br />

knowledge on aging. Care of the older person needs to be part<br />

of medical education and oncology education. Research will<br />

help attain a desirable quality of life with aging and a reduced<br />

morbidity.”<br />

The goals set forth by Drs. Yancik and Kennedy are yet to<br />

be fully achieved; however, many strides have been made toward<br />

that end. There has been increased recognition of the<br />

importance of the relationship between aging and cancer, as<br />

well as an increase in evidence-based research to guide the<br />

care of older adults with cancer. In addition, this research is<br />

being performed by a growing number of investigators at institutions<br />

across the nation, as well as internationally. The<br />

International Society of Geriatric Oncology, founded in the<br />

year 2000, fosters the mission of developing health professionals<br />

in the fıeld of geriatric oncology to optimize treatment<br />

of older adults with cancer, through education, clinical<br />

practice, and research. The Society’s publication, the Journal<br />

of Geriatric Oncology, is the fırst journal devoted solely to the<br />

fıeld. The Cancer in the Elderly Committee of the Cancer and<br />

Leukemia Group B (now the Alliance for Clinical Trials in<br />

Oncology) has supported furthering research in geriatric oncology<br />

through clinical trials and secondary data analyses.<br />

The Cancer and Aging Research Group has developed an instrument<br />

to predict chemotherapy toxicity, initiated and<br />

supported trials to validate this methodology in different<br />

clinical settings, and, most importantly, mentored junior investigators<br />

in geriatric oncology. The Gynecologic Oncology<br />

Group Elderly Taskforce is supporting the fırst<br />

prospective trial in older women with ovarian cancer and<br />

planning further studies in other diseases and modalities.<br />

The American Society of Clinical Oncology has also fostered<br />

a number of initiatives in geriatric oncology. These<br />

From the Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, Commack, NY.<br />

Disclosures of potential conflicts of interest are found at the end of this article.<br />

Corresponding author: Stuart M. Lichtman, MD, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 650 Commack Road, Commack, NY 11725; email: lichtmas@mskcc.org.<br />

© 2015 by American Society of Clinical Oncology.<br />

asco.org/edbook | 2015 ASCO EDUCATIONAL BOOK<br />

e127

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!