31.05.2015 Views

NcXHF

NcXHF

NcXHF

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

KREM AND GOPAL<br />

activated protein kinase, and Cullin 4 to function as part of an<br />

E3 ubiquitin ligase complex. 55 CRBN is required for the therapeutic<br />

effect of IMiDs. Its downstream signaling targets include<br />

interferon regulatory factor 4 and tumor necrosis<br />

factor-alpha. 56 Lenalidomide-bound cereblon, in its ubiquitin<br />

ligase function, also targets the Ikaros family zinc fınger<br />

proteins 1 and 3, which are B-cell–specifıc transcription factors,<br />

for degradation. 57<br />

Lenalidomide has shown effıcacy in the treatment of relapsed<br />

or refractory iNHL. In a study of 43 patients of median<br />

age 63 (21% older than 75) with FL, SLL, or MZL, 25 mg lenalidomide<br />

monotherapy administered 3 out of 4 weeks for<br />

up to 52 weeks induced a 23% ORR with a median duration of<br />

response of 16.5 months or greater. 58 Common adverse events<br />

(any grade) included neutropenia (58%), fatigue (51%), thrombocytopenia<br />

(42%), anemia (37%), and diarrhea (33%). Common<br />

grade 3 to 4 toxicities included neutropenia (46%),<br />

thrombocytopenia (19%), anemia (9%), asthenia (5%), and<br />

pneumonia (5%); 67% of patients required dose reductions or<br />

interruptions. Treatment discontinuation because of adverse<br />

events occurred in 19% of patients; there was one treatmentrelated<br />

death. Lenalidomide showed effıcacy in a relatively heavily<br />

pretreated population (median of three prior treatments)<br />

with moderate tolerability, with a study population that included<br />

older patients.<br />

Later-line effıcacy of lenalidomide led to a fırst-line, phase<br />

II trial of lenalidomide and rituximab in 110 patients with<br />

iNHL. Histologic subtypes included FL (50 patients), SLL (30<br />

patients), and MZL (30 patients), with median ages of 56, 59,<br />

and 59, respectively. Treatment with lenalidomide plus rituximab<br />

resulted in an ORR of 90%, a 65% CR rate, and a median<br />

PFS of 54 months. Response rates were similar across subtypes<br />

but highest in patients with FL. The most common grade 3 to 4<br />

AEs included neutropenia (35%), pain or myalgia (9%), rash<br />

(7%), fatigue (5%), thrombosis (5%), and pulmonary symptoms<br />

(5%); 28% of patients required dose reductions. No treatmentrelated<br />

deaths occurred. 59 Thus, the combination of lenalidomide<br />

and rituximab was well tolerated with good effıcacy,<br />

though the median patient ages were younger than those typically<br />

seen for the histologic subtypes treated. Toxicity and dosereduction<br />

or discontinuation rates may be higher in older<br />

patient populations. This approach is under investigation in a<br />

phase III trial that recently completed accrual to evaluate rituximab<br />

and lenalidomide versus rituximab and chemotherapy in<br />

untreated patients with FL.<br />

IMiDs have also demonstrated effıcacy in WM. 60 The combination<br />

of rituximab and lenalidomide induced a 50% ORR<br />

in a trial of 16 patients; 12 had been previously untreated and<br />

four patients had received prior therapy. The median age was 65.<br />

However, 13 out of 16 patients experienced a hematocrit decrease,<br />

resulting in early termination of enrollment; 88% of patients<br />

required treatment discontinuation. The most common<br />

grade 3 to 4 toxicity was neutropenia (31%). 61 Given the concern<br />

for thalidomide and neuropathy in WM patients, and the<br />

unique, idiosyncratic association of lenalidomide with anemia<br />

in WM, IMiD therapy will require further development before<br />

being ready for “prime time” in WM, especially in older patients<br />

who may be more affected by adverse events.<br />

PROTEASOME INHIBITORS<br />

Proteasome inhibitors such as bortezomib and carfılzomib<br />

inhibit the chymotrypsin-like sites of the proteasome’s<br />

20S subunit. That inhibition disrupts protein homeostasis and<br />

protein folding quality control, resulting in proteotoxic stress<br />

and activation of the unfolded protein response, leading to cell<br />

death; cancer cells experience higher toxicity as they are more<br />

susceptible to proteotoxic stress. 62 Bortezomib has been in use<br />

for the treatment of multiple myeloma for more than a decade,<br />

and its use in mantle cell NHL dates back several years, having<br />

received approval for relapsed or refractory disease in 2006 and<br />

approval for fırst-line therapy in October 2014. Bortezomib is<br />

still being studied for use in indolent lymphoma.<br />

Three phase II studies have established effıcacy of bortezomib<br />

in relapsed or refractory iNHL. 63-65 Results varied,<br />

with response rates ranging from 13% to 53%; the study with<br />

the lowest ORR was notable for a 64% stable disease rate. 64<br />

None of the studies reported grade 3 neuropathy higher<br />

than 10%. Notably, Di Bella et al enrolled a cohort of median<br />

age 70, 64 with grade 3 or 4 adverse events including<br />

thrombocytopenia (20%), fatigue (10%), neutropenia<br />

(8.5%), neuropathy (6.8%), and diarrhea (6.8%). 64 Thus,<br />

bortezomib may be a reasonably well-tolerated option<br />

with modest effıcacy in an older population. de Vos et al compared<br />

biweekly (1.3 mg/m 2 on days 1, 4, 8, and 11 of 21-day cycles)<br />

with weekly (1.6 mg/m 2 on days 1, 8, 15, and 22 of 35-day<br />

cycles) bortezomib in combination with rituximab and found<br />

the weekly regimen to be better tolerated, with fewer grade 3 or<br />

higher adverse events, including neuropathy (10% biweekly versus<br />

5% weekly). 65<br />

These initial favorable results led to a randomized, phase<br />

III trial of bortezomib plus rituximab versus rituximab<br />

alone for patients with relapsed or refractory FL. In the<br />

study, 1.6 mg/m 2 of bortezomib was administered intravenously<br />

on days 1, 8, 15, and 22 of 35-day cycles. A total of<br />

676 patients were enrolled with a median age of 57; 28% of<br />

patients were older than age 65. The addition of bortezomib resulted<br />

in a modest increase of PFS from 11 to 13 months. Grade<br />

3 or higher adverse events were higher in the combination arm,<br />

46% compared with 21%. Grade 3 or higher infection (11% vs.<br />

4%), neutropenia (11% vs. 4%), diarrhea (7% vs. 0%), and neuropathy<br />

(3% vs. 1%) favored rituximab alone. The combination<br />

arm experienced 1% possible treatment-related deaths. 66 Given<br />

the higher toxicity of the combination regimen, the modest<br />

2-month improvement in PFS was disappointing.<br />

However, recent data in high-tumor burden iNHL suggest<br />

that combination therapy with bortezomib and rituximab<br />

may still be desirable. A front-line phase II trial with 42<br />

patients of median age 61 with primarily FL received 1.6<br />

mg/m 2 of bortezomib intravenously on days 1, 8, 15, and<br />

22 of 35-day cycles. The ORR was 70% with a CR rate of<br />

e370<br />

2015 ASCO EDUCATIONAL BOOK | asco.org/edbook

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!