31.05.2015 Views

NcXHF

NcXHF

NcXHF

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

SURGICAL MANAGEMENT OF STAGE IIIA NON–SMALL CELL LUNG CANCER<br />

atrium, or diaphragm when we believe we can perform an R0<br />

resection. Patients with extensive T4 tumors in whom a<br />

complete resection is unlikely are generally poor surgical<br />

candidates. All of these treatment decisions are made as<br />

part of a multidisciplinary care team discussion and with<br />

the agreement of our thoracic oncologists and radiation<br />

oncologists.<br />

MANAGEMENT OF STAGE IIIA WITH N2<br />

MEDIASTINAL INVOLVEMENT<br />

Patients with stage IIIA disease and N2 lymph node involvement<br />

range from those with small tumor foci in a central<br />

node to those with bulky multi-station disease who, therefore,<br />

pose the greatest treatment challenge for thoracic oncologists.<br />

The nature of mediastinal disease portends bad<br />

outcomes and possible microscopically systemic, stage IV<br />

disease. However within this group, surgery can provide defınitive<br />

local control and lead to long-term survival for some<br />

patients. Randomized, controlled trials to evaluate the value<br />

of surgery in N2 disease have been continually plagued by<br />

enrollment diffıculties and many have closed prematurely. In<br />

addition, they have been affected over time by changes in<br />

staging criteria, evolving induction chemotherapy and radiation<br />

trends, and the development of novel chemotherapy<br />

agents.<br />

Early clinical trials, such as the Southwest Oncology Group<br />

(SWOG) 8805 study, demonstrated that patients with initially<br />

unresectable NSCLC could have their tumors downstaged<br />

with induction chemoradiation and ultimately<br />

undergo successful surgical resection. In this trial, patients<br />

whose tumors did not respond to induction treatment or had<br />

positive margins or nodes in the surgical specimen were<br />

given additional chemotherapy and radiation. Patients who<br />

underwent surgery had a median overall survival of 23.6<br />

months versus 22.2 months among patients who only received<br />

chemotherapy and radiation. The 3-year overall survival<br />

with triple-modality treatment was 27% versus 20% in<br />

the chemotherapy and radiation group, respectively. Patients<br />

whose tumors were downstaged to N0 disease after induction<br />

chemoradiation had the best outcomes, with triple-modality<br />

treatment with a 3-year survival rate of 44%. Collectively,<br />

these outcomes demonstrated that a triple-modality treatment<br />

approach was not worse than chemotherapy and radiation<br />

alone and, in certain subgroups of patients, led to<br />

improved survival outcomes.<br />

More recently, two large, randomized clinical trials have<br />

examined the benefıts of surgery in patients with stage IIIA,<br />

N2 NSCLC: the European Organization for Research and<br />

Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) 8941 trial and the North<br />

American Intergroup (INT) 0139 trial. EORTC 8941 compared<br />

surgery and radiation therapy in patients with stage<br />

IIIA N2 disease who responded to induction chemotherapy.<br />

Of 579 enrolled patients, 61% responded to three cycles of<br />

platinum-based induction chemotherapy and, therefore,<br />

were randomly assigned to either radiotherapy or surgery. A<br />

complete surgical resection was achieved in 50% of patients<br />

randomly assigned to surgery. Pneumonectomy was required<br />

in 47% of patients, and the overall operative mortality<br />

rate was 4%. Adjuvant radiotherapy was given to 40% of patients<br />

after surgery. There were no differences in survival between<br />

patients who underwent a surgical resection or<br />

radiotherapy, with a median survival of 16.4 months versus<br />

17.5 months, respectively, and a 5-year overall survival rate of<br />

15.7% and 14.0%, respectively. 12 This trial has been criticized<br />

for inadequate clinical staging, without PET/CT or brain<br />

MRI, which likely led to the inclusion of some patients with<br />

later-stage IIIB and IV disease. In addition, the study reported<br />

a relatively low rate of a complete R0 surgical resection<br />

and a high rate of pneumonectomy, which may reflect<br />

the advanced disease in these patients and account for the<br />

greater morbidity in the surgical arm of the study. 4<br />

As data emerged that concurrent neoadjuvant chemotherapy<br />

and radiation yielded better outcomes than sequential<br />

administration, new randomized, controlled trials were designed<br />

to defıne the role of surgical resections. INT 0139 involved<br />

429 patients with pathologically proven stage IIIA N2<br />

disease who were fırst treated with induction chemotherapy<br />

plus radiation and then randomly assigned to surgery followed<br />

by adjuvant chemotherapy or continued radiation, up<br />

to 61 Gy, followed by more chemotherapy. A complete surgical<br />

resection was achieved in 71% of patients randomly<br />

assigned to surgery. Overall there were no differences between<br />

patients who underwent a complete surgical resection<br />

versus defınitive, full-dose radiation, with median overall<br />

survival times of 23.6 months versus 22.2 months, respectively,<br />

and 5-year survival rates of 27% and 20%, respectively.<br />

However, PFS was signifıcantly improved with surgery (12.8<br />

months vs. 10.5 months; p 0.017). Survival outcomes also<br />

were signifıcantly better in the subgroup of patients whose<br />

tumors were downstaged to N0 by induction chemotherapy,<br />

with a median overall survival time of 34.4 months and a<br />

5-year survival rate of 41% (p 0.0001). 13<br />

Another large trial to include patients with stage IIIA disease<br />

was the Adjuvant Navelbine International Trialist Association<br />

(ANITA) trial, which demonstrated a survival benefıt<br />

with adjuvant chemotherapy in patients who had stage IB to<br />

IIIA, fully resected lung cancer. Among patients who received<br />

adjuvant cisplatin-based chemotherapy and radiation<br />

after surgery, there was a 5-year overall survival rate of 47%<br />

among patients with N2 disease. 14 Similar outcomes have<br />

been reported in single-institution, retrospective studies of<br />

tri-modal therapy in patients with stage IIIA N2 disease. Askoxylakis<br />

et al 15 reported a median survival time of 32<br />

months and 1-, 3-, and 5-year survival rates of 85%, 50%, and<br />

36%, respectively; 32% of patients who underwent an R0 resection<br />

remained disease free at 5 years. 15<br />

These clinical trials have consistently shown that certain<br />

characteristics are good prognostic indicators in stage IIIA<br />

N2 disease. A response to treatment or downstaging of the<br />

asco.org/edbook | 2015 ASCO EDUCATIONAL BOOK<br />

e437

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!