31.05.2015 Views

NcXHF

NcXHF

NcXHF

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

SANDRO V. PORCEDDU<br />

A review by Alam and Ratner reported that the risk for local<br />

recurrence and metastases for cSCC increases in the presence<br />

of factors such as rapid growth, greater than 2 cm<br />

diameter, primary site of lip or ear, immunosuppression,<br />

previous RT, recurrence, greater than 4 mm thickness or<br />

Clark level IV, poor differentiation, infıltrative or peripheral<br />

margins, spindle or acantholytic features, and perineural invasion<br />

(PNI). 2<br />

Brantsch et al published the results of a prospective study<br />

assessing the risk factors for recurrence and regional metastases<br />

in cSCC. They reported that patients with a tumor<br />

thickness of 2.0 mm or smaller did not develop metastases.<br />

Metastases occurred at a rate of 4% among patients with tumors<br />

between 2.1 to 6.0 mm and 16% for tumors larger than<br />

6.0 mm. The risk for local recurrence depended on increasing<br />

tumor thickness and desmoplasia. 5<br />

The National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN)<br />

has produced a table detailing high- and low-risk factors for<br />

recurrence of BCC and cSCC based on a combination of<br />

available evidence and workshop group consensus. 6<br />

Clayman et al identifıed several factors that reduce diseasespecifıc<br />

survival (DSS) in patients with cSCC. These factors<br />

include local recurrence at presentation, increasing tumor<br />

size and depth, invasion beyond subcutaneous tissues, and<br />

PNI. Patients with one or more risk factors, when compared<br />

with patients with no risk factors, had a signifıcantly inferior<br />

3-year DSS of 70% vs. 100%, respectively (p 0.001, log-rank<br />

test). 7<br />

PNI, immunosuppression, and regional nodal involvement<br />

are well-recognized prognostic risk factors for LRC and<br />

distant relapse, and are discussed in greater detail below.<br />

Table 1 summarizes the commonly accepted prognostic<br />

risk factors in NMSC of the head and neck.<br />

KEY POINTS<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

Non-melanoma skin cancer (NMSC) is the most common<br />

cancer worldwide. Approximately 75% to 80% of cases<br />

are basal cell carcinoma and 20% to 25% of cases are<br />

cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma.<br />

Division into low- and high-risk NMSC is somewhat arbitrary<br />

since disease type falls on a continuous spectrum, as data<br />

from retrospective series have shown.<br />

Approximately 5% of patients with NMSC (mainly<br />

cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma) are considered to be<br />

at high risk for relapse, either local, regional, or distant<br />

(rarely), following surgery.<br />

Because of the dearth of high-level evidence on the<br />

benefits of adjuvant radiation therapy (RT), there is a lack<br />

of universally adopted guidelines regarding its use. Use of<br />

adjuvant RT is commonly based on individual institutional<br />

policy.<br />

Retrospective series support consideration of adjuvant RT<br />

in the presence of advanced primary disease (stages T3-<br />

T4), regional nodal involvement, clinical perineural invasion<br />

(cPNI) and immunosuppression.<br />

TABLE 1. Prognostic Risk Factors for Relapse of<br />

NMSC of the Head and Neck<br />

Risk Factors Low Risk High Risk<br />

Tumor size and T-stage 2cm 2cm<br />

(AJCC/UICC)<br />

T1-2 Stages T3-T4<br />

Tumor thickness (SCC) 2mm 2mm<br />

Clark level 4<br />

Sites<br />

Lip, mask areas of face<br />

Differentiation Well Poor<br />

Subtype (SCC)<br />

Basosquamous,<br />

desmoplastic,<br />

adenosquamous<br />

Perineural invasion Absent or single<br />

small nerve<br />

Multifocal small nerve,<br />

named nerve<br />

Rapid growth Absent Present<br />

Borders Well-defined Poorly defined, in-transit<br />

Lymphovascular space Absent Present<br />

invasion<br />

Margin status Negative Positive<br />

Immune status<br />

Immunosuppressed<br />

Chronic inflammation, Absent Present<br />

scars (SCC)<br />

Previous radiation therapy Absent Present<br />

Nevoid basal cell carcinoma Present Absent<br />

syndrome* (BCC)<br />

Recurrent disease No Yes<br />

Abbreviations: NMSC, non-melanoma skin cancer; AJCC, American Joint Committee on<br />

Cancer; UICC, Union for International Cancer Control; SCC, squamous cell carcinoma; BCC,<br />

basal cell carcinoma.<br />

*Also known as Gorlin syndrome.<br />

Perineural Invasion<br />

PNI can be divided into two categories: (1) disease detected<br />

incidentally on pathologic assessment (pPNI) and (2) involving<br />

a named nerve (cPNI). For patients with cPNI, a prior<br />

history of pPNI is not always present.<br />

PNI is more frequently seen in patients with cSCC (5% to<br />

10%) than in patients with BCC (2% to 5%). 8,9 In the case of<br />

cPNI, the Trigeminal (V) and Facial (VII) cranial nerves<br />

(CN) are commonly affected, typically involving retrograde<br />

progression (progression of disease from the periphery<br />

(skin) toward the brain/brainstem). Diagnosis may be delayed<br />

with VII CN involvement because of an initial misdiagnosis<br />

of Bell’s palsy. Diagnosis can be facilitated with the<br />

use of targeted 3 Tesla MRI neurography, which provides superior<br />

sensitivity and specifıcity compared with computed<br />

tomography (CT). 10<br />

There is some evidence that extratumoral disease (PNI<br />

seen extending beyond the main tumor mass), large nerve<br />

diameter involvement, and multifocal PNI are associated<br />

with more aggressive disease behavior. 8,11<br />

cPNI is more aggressive when seen in cSCC compared with<br />

BCC. Jackson et al reported 5-year local control (LC) rates of<br />

90% for pPNI compared with 57% for cPNI (p 0.0001). The<br />

pPNI and cPNI groups also differed in relapse-free survival<br />

(76% vs. 46%, p 0.003), DSS (90% vs. 76%, p 0.002), and<br />

e514<br />

2015 ASCO EDUCATIONAL BOOK | asco.org/edbook

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!