31.05.2015 Views

NcXHF

NcXHF

NcXHF

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

BONE HEALTH AND ENDOCRINE THERAPY IN BREAST OR PROSTATE CANCER<br />

Bone Health in Adults Treated with Endocrine Therapy for<br />

Early Breast or Prostate Cancer<br />

Catherine H. Van Poznak, MD<br />

OVERVIEW<br />

Bone is a hormonally responsive organ. Sex hormones and calcium regulating hormones, including parathyroid hormone, 1–25 dihydroxy<br />

vitamin D, and calcitonin, have effects on bone resorption and bone deposition. These hormones affect both bone quality and bone<br />

quantity. The sex hormone estrogen inhibits bone resorption, and estrogen therapy has been developed to prevent and treat<br />

osteoporosis. Androgens are an important source of estrogen through the action of the enzyme aromatase and may themselves<br />

stimulate bone formation. Hence, the sex steroids play a role in bone metabolism. Breast cancer and prostate cancer are frequently<br />

hormonally responsive and may be treated with antiestrogens or antiandrogens respectfully. In addition, chemotherapy and supportive<br />

medications may alter the patient’s endocrine system. In general, the suppression of sex hormones has a predictable affect on bone<br />

health, as seen by loss of bone mineral density and increased risk of fragility fractures. The bone toxicity of cancer-directed endocrine<br />

therapy can be mitigated through screening, counseling on optimization of calcium and vitamin D intake, exercise, and other<br />

lifestyle/behavioral actions, as well as the use of medications when the fracture risk is high. Maintaining bone health in patients who<br />

are treated with endocrine therapy for breast and prostate cancer is the focus of this review.<br />

In the United States, approximately one in eight women<br />

will be affected by breast cancer and one in seven men will<br />

be affected by prostate cancer. Screening techniques and excellent<br />

therapies exist for both of these cancers. Although<br />

there remains room for improvement, the cure and survival<br />

rates for both of these cancers are high. It is estimated that<br />

there are more than 2.8 million breast cancer survivors and<br />

more than 2.7 million prostate cancer survivors alive today in<br />

the United States. 1,2 Breast cancer and prostate cancer are<br />

frequently hormonally responsive and may be treated with<br />

antiestrogens or antiandrogens. In general, the suppression<br />

of sex hormones during cancer therapy has a predictable<br />

affect on bone health, as seen by loss of bone mineral<br />

density and increased risk of fragility fractures. Hence, in<br />

terms of survivorship of these patients, long-term bone<br />

health issues, including osteoporosis, are a public health<br />

concern.<br />

When treating breast and prostate cancer in the adjuvant<br />

setting, the goals of care are curative. For metastatic breast or<br />

prostate cancer, the goals of care are palliative. Metastatic<br />

breast and prostate cancers typically affect life expectancy<br />

and often cause bone metastases. Although the following discussion<br />

of bone health includes much that is applicable to<br />

both adjuvant and metastatic care, the focus is on the nonmetastatic<br />

setting.<br />

OSTEOPENIA AND OSTEOPOROSIS IN THE OLDER<br />

ADULT POPULATION<br />

In the United States, approximately 10 million people have<br />

osteoporosis and an additional 43 million have low bone density.<br />

3,4 Low bone mass correlates with an increased risk for<br />

fracture, and fractures are associated with substantial morbidity<br />

and mortality. Approximately one in two women and<br />

one in fıve men in the United States will experience an osteoporotic<br />

fracture. 3 A particularly disconcerting fact is that a<br />

hip fracture is associated with 8% to 36% excess mortality<br />

within 1 year. In addition, 20% of patients with a fracture of<br />

the hip require long-term nursing home care, and 60% will<br />

not regain their prefracture level of independence. 3 In addition<br />

to the pain and suffering associated with fractures, they<br />

are also is a substantial burden to health care expenditure.<br />

A standard technique for measuring bone mineral density<br />

(BMD) is dual energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA). The<br />

World Health Organization 5 has defıned conditions of low<br />

bone mass using BMD as outlined in Table 1. The T score<br />

represents the standard deviation from an ideal bone mass.<br />

The BMD measurement provides the diagnostic criteria of<br />

osteoporosis as well as a threshold for pharmaceutical intervention.<br />

4 Although the T score provides the operational definition<br />

of osteoporosis, the underlying health concern is the<br />

risk for fracture, not simply having a low DXA T score. There<br />

From the Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Hematology/Oncology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 5848.<br />

Disclosures of potential conflicts of interest are found at the end of this article.<br />

Corresponding author: Catherine Van Poznak, MD, Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Hematology/Oncology, University of Michigan, 1500 E Medical Center Dr., Ann Arbor, MI 48109;<br />

email: cvanpoz@med.umich.edu.<br />

© 2015 by American Society of Clinical Oncology.<br />

asco.org/edbook | 2015 ASCO EDUCATIONAL BOOK<br />

e567

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!