31.05.2015 Views

NcXHF

NcXHF

NcXHF

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

BENJAMIN ET AL<br />

FIGURE 1. Continuous Disease-Free Survival by Tumor<br />

Necrosis<br />

FIGURE 2. Continuous Disease-Free Survival with<br />

Tumor Necrosis of 90% or Less<br />

will be needed in patients whose disease cannot be treated<br />

surgically. 17<br />

OSTEOSARCOMA<br />

Our therapy for osteosarcoma is based on experience in a<br />

group of patients treated from 1980 to 1991 with induction<br />

therapy of 90 mg/m 2 of doxorubicin as a continuous intravenous<br />

infusion over 48 to 96 hours and 120 to 160 mg/m 2 of<br />

cisplatin intra-arterially. Initially, we found a marked difference<br />

in postoperative continuous disease-free survival<br />

(CDFS) between those with 90% or greater (i.e., good) tumor<br />

necrosis and those with less than 90% (i.e., poor) tumor<br />

necrosis. 20 (Fig. 1) We subsequently modifıed postoperative<br />

chemotherapy, fırst adding high-dose methotrexate<br />

and later, in addition, ifosfamide. We found no benefıt<br />

from the addition of methotrexate to the good responders,<br />

but we observed an increased CDFS in the poor responders<br />

from 13% to 34%. The subsequent addition of ifosfamide<br />

to the postoperative regimen further increased the<br />

CDFS to 67% (Fig. 2), such that the difference between<br />

good and poor responders was no longer statistically signifıcant.<br />

21<br />

Because we have not had additional good drugs to add to<br />

our regimen, we have continued the practice established in<br />

our 1988 to 1991 series of adding ifosfamide and highdose<br />

methotrexate to patients who have poor tumor necrosis.<br />

We recently reviewed a series of 46 patients with<br />

primary osteosarcoma of the extremities who were treated<br />

according to this approach. The median 10-year CDFS was<br />

50%, and there was no difference between patients with<br />

good or poor necrosis. The recent EURAMOS study concluded<br />

that addition of ifosfamide was of no benefıt to<br />

(largely) pediatric patients with osteosarcoma and poor<br />

necrosis. 22 The initial approach with modifıed adjuvant<br />

chemotherapy after poor response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy<br />

came from the sequential studies of Rosen et al, 23<br />

the inventor of the neoadjuvant approach. 23 Our data, together<br />

with the early studies of Bacci et al from the Rizzoli Institute, 24<br />

support adaptation of postoperative therapy to preoperative response,<br />

despite the EURAMOS data. Our approach emphasizes<br />

maximum doses of the individual drugs in the initial<br />

doxorubicin-cisplatin doublet rather than adding methotrexate,<br />

which overlaps in nephrotoxicity with cisplatin<br />

and in mucositis with doxorubicin. We see no advantage<br />

to adding methotrexate in good responders, and it can be a<br />

diffıcult drug to use in older patients.<br />

One factor that needs emphasis is that the spectrum of<br />

histologic appearance in adult osteosarcoma is quite different<br />

from that usually seen in pediatric series. Conventional<br />

osteosarcoma (osteoblastic, chondroblastic, and<br />

fıbroblastic subtypes) makes up the vast majority of cases<br />

in typical pediatric series. Of the variants, only telangiectatic<br />

osteosarcoma has a similar response to therapy and<br />

prognosis. Patients with chondroblastic osteosarcoma had<br />

a lower rate of good necrosis but a better prognosis despite<br />

poor necrosis in our original series of patients, and that<br />

observation appears to be true in the subsequent group we<br />

analyzed, albeit with small numbers. Patients with variant<br />

histology (dedifferentiated parosteal osteosarcoma, highgrade<br />

surface osteosarcoma, small cell osteosarcoma)<br />

other than telangiectatic osteosarcoma represented 12% of<br />

our original series and had signifıcantly worse CDFS. Perhaps<br />

because of the increasing age of patients currently seen<br />

on our pediatric service, variant histology was even more<br />

common in our recent group (28%). The patients in our current<br />

group were older than in our original series. In our current<br />

group, 46% are older than age 30, and 33% are older than<br />

age 40, compared with 23% and 11%, respectively, in our initial<br />

series.<br />

PET-CT is the best imaging modality to assess response to<br />

therapy. MRI is the best modality to defıne an anatomic abnormality<br />

within bone, but it routinely overestimates the extent<br />

of residual viable tumor. CT shows details of cortical<br />

e658<br />

2015 ASCO EDUCATIONAL BOOK | asco.org/edbook

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!