10.07.2015 Views

Stories of Philanthropic Leadership in Advancing Regional and ...

Stories of Philanthropic Leadership in Advancing Regional and ...

Stories of Philanthropic Leadership in Advancing Regional and ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

REGIONAL OPPORTUNITYwith<strong>in</strong> walk<strong>in</strong>g distance <strong>of</strong> transit. TOD projects<strong>in</strong>crease the density <strong>of</strong> people near transit, <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>gresidents, employees, visitors, <strong>and</strong> customers, <strong>in</strong> abuilt environment that is pedestrian-friendly <strong>and</strong>connected to transit. Mixed-use build<strong>in</strong>gs, projects,or areas with a mix <strong>of</strong> uses are active from early <strong>in</strong> themorn<strong>in</strong>g to late <strong>in</strong> the even<strong>in</strong>g, mak<strong>in</strong>g theenvironment safer for pedestrians <strong>and</strong> provid<strong>in</strong>g peak<strong>and</strong> <strong>of</strong>f-peak customers for transit service. A TODmay be a s<strong>in</strong>gle build<strong>in</strong>g, a group <strong>of</strong> build<strong>in</strong>gs, or amultiple block district.”Transit-oriented development is not exceptional,either today or <strong>in</strong> the past. In a certa<strong>in</strong> era, it was acommon development pattern, as neighborhoodsclustered around subway stations, streetcar l<strong>in</strong>es, <strong>and</strong>the like. After a period <strong>of</strong> decl<strong>in</strong>e which co<strong>in</strong>cidedwith the growth <strong>in</strong> auto use <strong>and</strong> suburban sprawl,TOD experienced a 1990s revival <strong>in</strong> response toadvocacy for smarter growth policies, exp<strong>and</strong>edtransit systems, <strong>and</strong> the drive for central cityrevitalization. What rema<strong>in</strong>s exceptional are TODprojects that mean<strong>in</strong>gfully anticipate their potentialgentrify<strong>in</strong>g impacts <strong>and</strong>, therefore, develop antidisplacementmechanisms <strong>in</strong> an <strong>in</strong>clusive <strong>and</strong>community-based process.Historically, new developments (transit-oriented orotherwise)—particularly subsidized developments<strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong>ner-city communities—spur a familiar pattern<strong>of</strong> displacement <strong>and</strong> gentrification. Public<strong>in</strong>vestment canmotivate a greaterWhat rema<strong>in</strong>s exceptional <strong>in</strong>vestment fromare TOD projects that the private sectormean<strong>in</strong>gfully anticipate their <strong>and</strong> attract newpotential gentrify<strong>in</strong>g impactsresidents to apreviously<strong>and</strong>, therefore, develop antidisplacementmechanisms neighborhood. Thisdis<strong>in</strong>vested<strong>in</strong> an <strong>in</strong>clusive <strong>and</strong> <strong>in</strong>creasedcommunity-based process. desirability feeds aquick run-up <strong>in</strong>l<strong>and</strong> values <strong>and</strong>related costs (e.g., rents, property taxes). S<strong>in</strong>glefamilyrentals are sold <strong>and</strong> converted tohomeownership <strong>and</strong> subst<strong>and</strong>ard properties arerazed or improved so as to meet the dem<strong>and</strong>s <strong>of</strong> thenew, higher-<strong>in</strong>come residents. Exist<strong>in</strong>g residents aresubjected to multiple displac<strong>in</strong>g pressures <strong>and</strong>exist<strong>in</strong>g bus<strong>in</strong>esses/employers face ris<strong>in</strong>g operat<strong>in</strong>gexpenses <strong>and</strong> the loss <strong>of</strong> their customer base.Affordable rental property, residential orcommercial, becomes harder to f<strong>in</strong>d. To somedegree, displacement <strong>and</strong> gentrification result fromexclusive decisionmak<strong>in</strong>g. It is more likely <strong>and</strong> moreextensive where potentially affected communityresidents, particularly those most at risk <strong>of</strong>displacement (low-<strong>in</strong>come people, people <strong>of</strong> color,the elderly, the disabled, <strong>and</strong> small bus<strong>in</strong>esses) lackmean<strong>in</strong>gful opportunities to access <strong>and</strong> <strong>in</strong>fluencedevelopment decisions. In their absence, suchdecisionmak<strong>in</strong>g is less likely to prioritize an antidisplacementagenda.The East Harlem Community L<strong>in</strong>k InitiativeIt is aga<strong>in</strong>st this backdrop that the <strong>Regional</strong> PlanAssociation (RPA), an <strong>in</strong>dependent, not-for-pr<strong>of</strong>itregional plann<strong>in</strong>g organization, strives to improve thequality <strong>of</strong> life <strong>and</strong> economic competitiveness <strong>in</strong> the31-county New York-New Jersey-ConnecticutRegion through research, plann<strong>in</strong>g, <strong>and</strong> advocacy.Released <strong>in</strong> 1996, RPA’s Third <strong>Regional</strong> Plan, “ARegion at Risk,” called for build<strong>in</strong>g a seamless 21 stcentury mass transit system, creat<strong>in</strong>g a three millionacreGreensward network <strong>of</strong> protected naturalresource systems, ma<strong>in</strong>ta<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g half <strong>of</strong> the region’semployment <strong>in</strong> urban centers, <strong>and</strong> assist<strong>in</strong>g m<strong>in</strong>ority<strong>and</strong> immigrant communities to fully participate <strong>in</strong>the economic ma<strong>in</strong>stream.A key recommendation <strong>of</strong> RPA’s plan was the revival<strong>of</strong> the long-dormant Second Avenue Subway project<strong>in</strong> the East Harlem neighborhood <strong>of</strong> New York City.Proposals to build a north-south subway l<strong>in</strong>e alongSecond Avenue date back to 1929, with several plans<strong>and</strong> false starts <strong>in</strong> the follow<strong>in</strong>g decades. Fastforward to 1995, the Metropolitan TransportationAuthority (MTA) began the Manhattan East SideAlternatives (MESA) Study. The MESA study teamcompiled a list <strong>of</strong> more than 20 alternatives toresolve exist<strong>in</strong>g <strong>and</strong> future transportation issuesidentified with<strong>in</strong> the study area, but proposed ashortened version that would fail to connect manylow-<strong>in</strong>come communities to job opportunities <strong>in</strong>downtown Manhattan. The <strong>Regional</strong> PlanAssociation <strong>and</strong> its allies commenced acomprehensive, successful campaign <strong>in</strong>volv<strong>in</strong>gadvertis<strong>in</strong>g <strong>and</strong> local elected <strong>of</strong>ficials, <strong>and</strong> the MTAboard eventually allocated $1.05 billion <strong>in</strong> its 2000-2004 Capital Program to complete the plann<strong>in</strong>g <strong>and</strong>design <strong>and</strong> <strong>in</strong>itiate construction <strong>of</strong> a full-lengthSecond Avenue Subway.101Funders’ Network for Smart Growth <strong>and</strong> Livable Communities

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!