EQUITABLE PUBLIC INVESTMENTphilanthropists, <strong>and</strong> organizations across bordersfor a greater common vision.Contact PeopleRichard KiyPresident & CEOInternational Community Foundationrkiy@icfdn.org(858) 677-2912Anne McEnanyDirector <strong>of</strong> Susta<strong>in</strong>able CommunitiesInternational Community Foundationanne@icfdn.org(858) 677-2915Oscar RomoCoastal Tra<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g Program Coord<strong>in</strong>atorTijuana River National Estuar<strong>in</strong>e Research Reserveoromo@tijuanaestuary.org(619) 575-3613Emily Young, Ph.D.Associate Vice President, Community PartnershipsThe San Diego Foundationeyoung@sdfoundation.org(619) 235-230051Funders’ Network for Smart Growth <strong>and</strong> Livable Communities
I. I. MOBILIZING ACTION FORREGIONAL EQUITYFunders Highlighted:Barr FoundationThe Hyams Foundation“There is no question that <strong>in</strong>teract<strong>in</strong>g with Actionfor <strong>Regional</strong> Equity has significantly sharpenedmy th<strong>in</strong>k<strong>in</strong>g on equity issues that did not come up<strong>in</strong> some <strong>of</strong> the environmental circles where I wasfocused.”— Nancy Goodman, Environmental League<strong>of</strong> MassachusettsAction for <strong>Regional</strong> Equity is comprised <strong>of</strong>Massachusetts’ lead<strong>in</strong>g equity organizations <strong>and</strong>grassroots advocates com<strong>in</strong>g together to shape policyas well as engage <strong>in</strong> jo<strong>in</strong>t dialogue <strong>and</strong> advocacy. Thispr<strong>of</strong>ile highlights the promises <strong>and</strong> obstacles <strong>of</strong>jo<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g state <strong>and</strong> grassroots advocates together <strong>in</strong>order to achieve greater collaboration, leveragecollective learn<strong>in</strong>g, <strong>and</strong> foster more effective advocacyfor regional equity.Project Pr<strong>of</strong>ile<strong>Regional</strong> equity advocacy achieved a turn<strong>in</strong>gpo<strong>in</strong>t <strong>in</strong> March 2002, when advocates attendeda national conference <strong>in</strong> Kansas City, Mo.,sponsored by PolicyL<strong>in</strong>k <strong>and</strong> the NationalCommunity Build<strong>in</strong>g Network (NCBN) thatfocused on equitable development <strong>in</strong> regionsacross the country. Such issues were <strong>of</strong> criticalimportance for the Boston region.The Census 2000 revealed metropolitan Boston’sSt<strong>and</strong>ard Metropolitan Statistical Area (SMSA)held 3.4 million residents. The <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>g diversity<strong>of</strong> the region is highlighted by a surge <strong>in</strong> foreignbornimmigration that has directly shaped theregional demographic. 21 But the Census 2000 onlybeg<strong>in</strong>s to tell the story. Greater Boston hasundergone a pr<strong>of</strong>ound transformation dur<strong>in</strong>g thepast 20 years that has revitalized the economy,energized its considerable <strong>in</strong>tellectual capital, <strong>and</strong>re-established it as one <strong>of</strong> the nation’s dest<strong>in</strong>ationmetropolitan regions. It has also challengedMassachusetts residents to reth<strong>in</strong>k long-st<strong>and</strong><strong>in</strong>gnotions <strong>of</strong> race, class, political autonomy, <strong>and</strong> localdeterm<strong>in</strong>ation.For equity advocates, the 1990s were a difficultdecade. In the face <strong>of</strong> unprecedented economicgrowth, many low-<strong>in</strong>come communities <strong>and</strong>populations <strong>of</strong> color found themselves left beh<strong>in</strong>d.Aggressive private development with <strong>in</strong>sufficientpublic policy safeguards led to a particularly virulentwave <strong>of</strong> gentrification, with hous<strong>in</strong>g prices exceed<strong>in</strong>gnearly every other metropolitan region <strong>in</strong> the UnitedStates. The future <strong>of</strong> the Boston region—the type,location, <strong>and</strong> cost <strong>of</strong> hous<strong>in</strong>g; the quality <strong>and</strong>accessibility <strong>of</strong> jobs; the health, safety, <strong>and</strong> character<strong>of</strong> communities—rema<strong>in</strong>s the subject <strong>of</strong> <strong>in</strong>tensepublic debate. A new dimension <strong>in</strong> this discourse isthe notion <strong>of</strong> smart growth pr<strong>in</strong>ciples <strong>and</strong> policies<strong>in</strong>tended to counter the prevail<strong>in</strong>g trend <strong>of</strong> sprawl<strong>in</strong>gdevelopment. Smart growth is best known as astrategy for build<strong>in</strong>g more compactly <strong>in</strong> order toconserve open space, reduce automobile dependence<strong>and</strong> energy consumption, <strong>and</strong> <strong>in</strong>tegrate l<strong>and</strong> uses<strong>in</strong>to more mixed-use, pedestrian-accessibleneighborhoods. Yet for many equity advocates,because <strong>of</strong> a lack <strong>of</strong> serious attention to hous<strong>in</strong>gaffordability, smart growth represents yet another <strong>in</strong> aseries <strong>of</strong> public plann<strong>in</strong>g paradigms that could yieldharmful consequences for their constituents.The displacementwave only <strong>in</strong>tensifiedthe impacts forBoston’s m<strong>in</strong>orityneighborhoods suchas Roxbury <strong>and</strong>Ch<strong>in</strong>atown. S<strong>in</strong>ce the1950s, Ch<strong>in</strong>atownhas lost two-thirds <strong>of</strong>its residential l<strong>and</strong> toother uses. “Smartgrowth does noth<strong>in</strong>gThe future <strong>of</strong> the Bostonregion—the type, location,<strong>and</strong> cost <strong>of</strong> hous<strong>in</strong>g; thequality <strong>and</strong> accessibility <strong>of</strong>jobs; the health, safety, <strong>and</strong>character <strong>of</strong> communities—rema<strong>in</strong>s the subject <strong>of</strong><strong>in</strong>tense public debate.to protect our residents,” notes Lydia Lowe, executivedirector <strong>of</strong> the Ch<strong>in</strong>ese Progressive Association, theneighborhood’s pr<strong>in</strong>cipal advocacy organization. “Tous, it means br<strong>in</strong>g<strong>in</strong>g wealthy residents <strong>in</strong> from thesuburbs that drive hous<strong>in</strong>g prices beyond the ability<strong>of</strong> Ch<strong>in</strong>atown residents to stay. There has to be abetter alternative.” Displacement from theseneighborhoods <strong>and</strong> the <strong>in</strong>flux <strong>of</strong> new immigrants has21“Census 2000,” available at www.census.gov/ma<strong>in</strong>/www/cen2000.html.In fact, without this immigration, the city would have cont<strong>in</strong>ued a threedecadetrend <strong>of</strong> population loss.EQUITABLE PUBLIC INVESTMENTPart III: Section 1: Promot<strong>in</strong>g Equitable Public Investment 52
- Page 1 and 2:
Stories of Philanthropic Leadership
- Page 3 and 4:
Signs of Promise:Stories of Philant
- Page 5 and 6:
Funders’ Network for Smart Growth
- Page 7 and 8: (II. B.)(II. C.)Turning Neighborhoo
- Page 9 and 10: PART I:IntroductionThe Purpose of t
- Page 11 and 12: social justice issues as they relat
- Page 13 and 14: PART II:Perspectives on Advancing R
- Page 15 and 16: peer work, we can reestablish a sig
- Page 17 and 18: Annie E. Casey FoundationBaltimore,
- Page 19 and 20: neighborhoods into healthy ones—g
- Page 21 and 22: Charles and Helen Schwab Foundation
- Page 23 and 24: Section 1:Promoting Equitable Publi
- Page 25 and 26: I. A. BUILDING POWER AND GIVINGVOIC
- Page 27 and 28: policy advocates. In 2002, Milwauke
- Page 29 and 30: in Los Angeles, Ford’s Anthony no
- Page 31 and 32: I. B. PROMOTING COALITIONSTO ADVANC
- Page 33 and 34: Yet the interpersonal dynamics of c
- Page 35 and 36: guidelines. “Many of the member o
- Page 37 and 38: Funder InterestThe EPA supported th
- Page 39 and 40: I. D. DEMONSTRATING THESTRUGGLE FOR
- Page 41 and 42: Richmond, Calif.The second regional
- Page 43 and 44: through policy reform at the local
- Page 45 and 46: I. E. BUILDING COALITIONTHROUGH KNO
- Page 47 and 48: organizing project, the Connecticut
- Page 49 and 50: and businesses are quantified in a
- Page 51 and 52: I. G. REVITALIZING WHILEASSURING DI
- Page 53 and 54: In the late 1990s, the city of Albu
- Page 55 and 56: I. H. A TRAVEZ DE LA FRONTERA:LAND
- Page 57: The International Community Foundat
- Page 61 and 62: To meet all of these objectives, th
- Page 63 and 64: efforts. And with each public plann
- Page 65 and 66: pattern of disproportionate transpo
- Page 67 and 68: Clinica de la Raza identify this cr
- Page 69 and 70: Contact PeopleCarl AnthonyActing Di
- Page 71 and 72: Section 2:Making All Neighborhoods
- Page 73 and 74: II. A. REACHING BEYONDHOUSING TO IM
- Page 75 and 76: A local resident receives the keys
- Page 77 and 78: East Baltimore community and the Jo
- Page 79 and 80: example, adjacent to the EBDI area,
- Page 81 and 82: II. C. YIELDING REGIONALBENEFITS TH
- Page 83 and 84: is using transit-oriented developme
- Page 85 and 86: financing and innovative, forward-t
- Page 87 and 88: The Row House Community Development
- Page 89 and 90: II. E. COUNTERING THE PERFECTSTORM:
- Page 91 and 92: funded community programs, includin
- Page 93 and 94: housing developments and commercial
- Page 95 and 96: owned enterprises, totaling $8.5 mi
- Page 97 and 98: LOAN GUARANTEESSection 3:Connecting
- Page 99 and 100: III. A. MAKING HOUSING ANOPPORTUNIT
- Page 101 and 102: A new report from the National Hous
- Page 103 and 104: The Straphangers Campaign was found
- Page 105 and 106: Funder InterestThe Straphangers Cam
- Page 107 and 108: or increase poverty. Whether direct
- Page 109 and 110:
The Regional Plan Association then
- Page 111 and 112:
multi-stakeholder effort composed o
- Page 113 and 114:
director with LISC. No one set of s
- Page 115 and 116:
12 western Louisville neighborhoods
- Page 117 and 118:
III. E. UNITING THREE STATESFOR ONE
- Page 119 and 120:
increased their personal wealth by
- Page 121 and 122:
summary evaluation of MSDI found th
- Page 123 and 124:
method alone was strong enough to m
- Page 125 and 126:
consistent body of work. The Counci
- Page 127 and 128:
3) Issues Need to be ConnectedThe f
- Page 129 and 130:
PART V:Glossary of TermsThe terms d
- Page 131 and 132:
Regional and neighborhood equity. A
- Page 133 and 134:
Tijuana River Reserve, California:h
- Page 135 and 136:
Sargent Shriver National Center on
- Page 137:
1500 San Remo Avenue • Suite 249