11.07.2015 Views

Radiography in Modern Industry - Kodak

Radiography in Modern Industry - Kodak

Radiography in Modern Industry - Kodak

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Therefore, protection requirements for an iridium 192 source should be based on the radiationoutput, <strong>in</strong> terms of roentgens per hour at a known distance. The values of source strength, <strong>in</strong>curies, are merely a rough guide, and should be used only if the radiation output of the source isunknown. The table above can be extended to sources hav<strong>in</strong>g higher or lower radiation outputsthan those listed. The half-value layer of iridium 192 radiation <strong>in</strong> lead is about 1/6 <strong>in</strong>ch. Therefore,if the radiation output is doubled or halved, the lead thicknesses should be respectively <strong>in</strong>creasedor decreased by 1/6 <strong>in</strong>ch.Tables VII and VII are based on the storage of a particular amount of radioactive material <strong>in</strong> as<strong>in</strong>gle protective lead conta<strong>in</strong>er. The problem of protect<strong>in</strong>g film from gamma radiation becomesmore complicated when the film is exposed to radiation from several sources, each <strong>in</strong> its ownhous<strong>in</strong>g. Assume that a radiographic source is stored under the conditions required by Tables VIIand VII (for example, a 50-curie cobalt 60 source, <strong>in</strong> a 6.5-<strong>in</strong>ch lead conta<strong>in</strong>er 100 feet from thefilm storage). This comb<strong>in</strong>ation of lead and distance would adequately protect the film from thegamma radiation for the storage times given <strong>in</strong> the tables. However, if a second source, identicalwith the first and <strong>in</strong> a similar conta<strong>in</strong>er, is stored alongside the first, the radiation level at the filmwill be doubled. Obviously, then, if there are several sources <strong>in</strong> separate conta<strong>in</strong>ers, the leadprotection around each or the distance from the sources to the film must be <strong>in</strong>creased over thevalues given <strong>in</strong> the tables.The simplest method of determ<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g the film protection required for several sources is as follows.Multiply the actual total strength of the source <strong>in</strong> each conta<strong>in</strong>er by the number of separateconta<strong>in</strong>ers. Then use these assumed source strengths to choose lead thicknesses and distancesTables VII and VIII, and apply the values so found for the protection around each of the actualsources. For <strong>in</strong>stance, assume that <strong>in</strong> a particular radiographic department there are two sourceconta<strong>in</strong>ers, both at 100 feet from the film storage area. One conta<strong>in</strong>er holds 50 curies of cobalt 60and the other an iridium 192 source whose output is 5 roentgens per hour at 1 metre (5 rhm).S<strong>in</strong>ce there are two sources, the 5 curies of cobalt 60 will require the protection needed for a"solitary" 100-curie source, and the iridium 192 source will need the same protection as if asource whose output is 10 rhm were alone irradiat<strong>in</strong>g the stored film. The thicknesses of leadneeded are shown to be 7.0 <strong>in</strong>ches for the 50 curies of cobalt 60 (Table VII) and 1.7 <strong>in</strong>ches forthe iridium 192 whose emission is 5 rhm (Table VIII).This method of determ<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g the protective requirements when multiple sources must beconsidered is based on two facts. First, if several sources, say four, simultaneously irradiatestored film, the exposure contributed by each must be only one-quarter that which would bepermissible if each source were act<strong>in</strong>g alone--<strong>in</strong> other words, the gamma-ray attenuation must be<strong>in</strong>creased by a factor of four. Second, any comb<strong>in</strong>ation of source strength, lead thickness, anddistance given <strong>in</strong> Tables VII and VIII results <strong>in</strong> the same gamma-ray dose rate--about 0.017 mrper hour--be<strong>in</strong>g delivered to the film location. Thus, to determ<strong>in</strong>e conditions that would reduce theradiation from a particular source to one-quarter the value on which Tables BII and VIII arebased, it is only necessary to use the conditions that are set up for a source four times the actualsource strength.Heat, Humidity, and FumesDur<strong>in</strong>g packag<strong>in</strong>g, most x-ray films are enclosed <strong>in</strong> a moisture proof conta<strong>in</strong>er that is hermeticallysealed and then boxed. As long as the seal is unbroken, the film is protected aga<strong>in</strong>st moistureand fumes. Because of the deleterious effect of heat, all films should be stared <strong>in</strong> a cool, dryplace and ordered <strong>in</strong> such quantities that the supply of film on hand is renewed frequently.Under no circumstances should opened boxes of film be left <strong>in</strong> a chemical storage room or <strong>in</strong> anylocation where there is leakage of illum<strong>in</strong>at<strong>in</strong>g gas or any other types of gases, or where there isa possibility of contact with formal<strong>in</strong> vapors, hydrogen sulfide, ammonia, or hydrogen peroxide.Packages of sheet film should be stored on edge--that is, with the plane of the film vertical. Theyshould not be stacked with the boxes horizontal because the film <strong>in</strong> the bottom boxes can be<strong>Radiography</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>Modern</strong> <strong>Industry</strong> 101

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!