11.07.2015 Views

Radiography in Modern Industry - Kodak

Radiography in Modern Industry - Kodak

Radiography in Modern Industry - Kodak

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

such as a wall or floor, on the film side of the specimen may also scatter an appreciable quantityof x-rays back to the film, especially if the material receives the direct radiation from the x-raytube or gamma-ray source (See Figure 36). This is referred to as backscattered radiation.Figure 36: Intense backscattered radiation may orig<strong>in</strong>ate <strong>in</strong> the floor or wall. Con<strong>in</strong>g,mask<strong>in</strong>g, or diaphragm<strong>in</strong>g should be employed. Back<strong>in</strong>g the cassette with lead may giveadequate protection.Reduction Of ScatterAlthough scattered radiation can never be completely elim<strong>in</strong>ated, a number of means areavailable to reduce its effect. The various methods are discussed <strong>in</strong> terms of x-rays. Althoughmost of the same pr<strong>in</strong>ciples apply to gamma-ray radiography, differences <strong>in</strong> application arisebecause of the highly penetrat<strong>in</strong>g radiation emitted by most common <strong>in</strong>dustrial gamma-raysources. For example, a mask (See Figure 37) for use with 200 kV x-rays could easily be lightenough for convenient handl<strong>in</strong>g. A mask for use with cobalt 60 radiation, on the other hand,would be thick, heavy, and probably cumbersome. In any event, with either x-rays or gammarays, the means for reduc<strong>in</strong>g the effects of scattered radiation must be chosen on the basis ofcost, convenience, and effectiveness.<strong>Radiography</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>Modern</strong> <strong>Industry</strong> 51

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!