11.07.2015 Views

Radiography in Modern Industry - Kodak

Radiography in Modern Industry - Kodak

Radiography in Modern Industry - Kodak

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

On Speed And Contrast"). However, to use manual process<strong>in</strong>g as an example, the m<strong>in</strong>imumrecommended development time gives most of the available density and contrast. With certa<strong>in</strong> ofthe direct x-ray film types, somewhat higher speed and, <strong>in</strong> same cases, slightly more contrast arega<strong>in</strong>ed by extend<strong>in</strong>g the development, but <strong>in</strong> no case should the maximum time recommended bythe manufacturer be exceeded.A special case arises when, for technical or economic reasons, there is a maximum allowableexposure time, that is, exposure time cannot be <strong>in</strong>creased to take advantage of a higher filmgradient at higher densities. In such a case, an <strong>in</strong>crease <strong>in</strong> kilovoltage <strong>in</strong>creases the radiation<strong>in</strong>tensity penetrat<strong>in</strong>g the specimen, and hence the film is exposed to a higher density. This mayresult <strong>in</strong> an <strong>in</strong>crease <strong>in</strong> radiographic contrast. An example may be taken from the exposures usedto produce the exposure chart shown <strong>in</strong> Figure 44. The follow<strong>in</strong>g table lists the densities obta<strong>in</strong>edthrough the 1/2-<strong>in</strong>ch to 5/8-<strong>in</strong>ch sections, us<strong>in</strong>g an exposure of 8 mA-m<strong>in</strong>.kVD B1 / 2 <strong>in</strong>.steelD A5 / 8 <strong>in</strong>. steelRadiographic ContrastD B-D ARelative RadiographicContrast120 0.50 0.27 0.23 20140 1.20 0.67 0.53 46160 2.32 1.30 1.02 88180 3.48 2.32 1.16 100These data show that, when the exposure time is fixed, the density difference between the twosections <strong>in</strong>creases, and hence the visibility of detail <strong>in</strong> this thickness range is also improved asthe kilovoltage is raised. The improvement <strong>in</strong> visibility of detail occurs <strong>in</strong> spite of the decrease <strong>in</strong>the subject contrast caused by the <strong>in</strong>crease <strong>in</strong> kilovoltage, and is the direct result of us<strong>in</strong>g higherdensities where the gradient of the film is higher. Qualitatively, one may say that, <strong>in</strong> this particularcase, the film contrast is <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>g faster as a result of <strong>in</strong>creased density than the subjectcontrast is decreas<strong>in</strong>g as a result of <strong>in</strong>creased kilovoltage. It should be emphasized aga<strong>in</strong> thatthis change <strong>in</strong> radiographic contrast result<strong>in</strong>g from a change <strong>in</strong> kilovoltage is not the result of achange <strong>in</strong> shape of the characteristic curve but rather the result of us<strong>in</strong>g a different portion of thecharacteristic curve--a portion where the slope is greater.SpeedFilm contrast depends on the shape of the characteristic curve. The other significant valueobta<strong>in</strong>ed from the characteristic curve is the relative speed, which is governed by the location ofthe curve, along the log E axis, <strong>in</strong> relation to the curves of other films.In Figure 16 the curves for the various x-ray films are spaced along the log relative exposure axis.The spac<strong>in</strong>g of the curves arises from the differences <strong>in</strong> relative speed--the curves for the fasterfilms ly<strong>in</strong>g toward the left of the figure, those for the slower films toward the right. From thesecurves, relative exposures to produce a fixed density can be read; the relative speeds are<strong>in</strong>versely proportional to these exposures. For some <strong>in</strong>dustrial radiographic purposes, a density of1.5 is an appropriate level at which to compute relative speeds. However, the <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>g trendtoward high densities, with all radiographs viewed on high-<strong>in</strong>tensity illum<strong>in</strong>ators, makes a densityof 2.5 more suitable for much <strong>in</strong>dustrial radiography. Relative speed values derived from thecurves <strong>in</strong> Figure 116 for the two density levels are tabulated <strong>in</strong> the next table where Film X hasarbitrarily been assigned a relative speed of 100 at both densities.<strong>Radiography</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>Modern</strong> <strong>Industry</strong> 188

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!