The use of the Potter-Bucky diaphragm <strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong>dustrial radiography complicates the technique tosome extent and necessarily limits the flexibility of the arrangement of the x-ray tube, thespecimen, and the film. Grids can, however, be of great value <strong>in</strong> the radiography of berylliummore than about 3 <strong>in</strong>ches thick and <strong>in</strong> the exam<strong>in</strong>ation of other low-absorption materials ofmoderate and great thicknesses. For these materials, kilovoltages <strong>in</strong> the medical radiographicrange are used, and the medical forms of Potter-Bucky diaphragms are appropriate. Grid ratios(the ratio of height to width of the open<strong>in</strong>gs between the lead strips) of 12 or more are desirable.The Potter-Bucky diaphragm is seldom used elsewhere <strong>in</strong> the <strong>in</strong>dustrial field, although specialforms have been designed for the radiography of steel with voltages as high as 200 to 400 kV.These diaphragms are not used at higher voltages or with gamma rays because relatively thicklead strips would be needed to absorb the radiation scattered at these energies. This <strong>in</strong> turnwould require a Potter-Bucky diaphragm, and the associated mechanism, of an uneconomicalsize and complexity.Mottl<strong>in</strong>g Caused By X-Ray DiffractionA special form of scatter<strong>in</strong>g caused by x-ray diffraction (See "X-Ray Diffraction") is encounteredoccasionally. It is most often observed <strong>in</strong> the radiography of fairly th<strong>in</strong> metallic specimens whosegra<strong>in</strong> size is large enough to be an appreciable fraction of the part thickness. The radiographicappearance of this type of scatter<strong>in</strong>g is mottled and may be confused with the mottledappearance sometimes produced by porosity or segregation. It can be dist<strong>in</strong>guished from theseconditions by mak<strong>in</strong>g two successive radiographs, with the specimen rotated slightly (1 to 5degrees) between exposures, about an axis perpendicular to the central beam. A pattern causedby porosity or segregation will change only slightly; however, one caused by diffraction will showa marked change. The radiographs of some specimens will show a mottl<strong>in</strong>g from both effects,and careful observation is needed to differentiate between them.The basic facts of x-ray diffraction are given <strong>in</strong> "X-Ray Diffraction". Briefly, however, a relativelylarge crystal or gra<strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong> a relatively th<strong>in</strong> specimen may <strong>in</strong> some cases "reflect" an appreciableportion of the x-ray energy fall<strong>in</strong>g on the specimen, much as if it were a small mirror. This willresult <strong>in</strong> a light spot on the developed radiograph correspond<strong>in</strong>g to the position of the particularcrystal and may also produce a dark spot <strong>in</strong> another location if the diffracted, or "reflected," beamstrikes the film. Should this beam strike the film beneath a thick part of the specimen, the darkspot may be mistaken for a void <strong>in</strong> the thick section. This effect is not observed <strong>in</strong> most <strong>in</strong>dustrialradiography, because most specimens are composed of a multitude of very m<strong>in</strong>ute crystals orgra<strong>in</strong>s, variously oriented; hence, scatter by diffraction is essentially uniform over the film area. Inaddition, the directly transmitted beam usually reduces the contrast <strong>in</strong> the diffraction pattern to apo<strong>in</strong>t where it is no longer visible on the radiograph.The mottl<strong>in</strong>g caused by diffraction can be reduced, and <strong>in</strong> some cases elim<strong>in</strong>ated, by rais<strong>in</strong>g thekilovoltage and by us<strong>in</strong>g lead foil screens. The former is often of positive value even though theradiographic contrast is reduced. S<strong>in</strong>ce def<strong>in</strong>ite rules are difficult to formulate, both approachesshould be tried <strong>in</strong> a new situation, or perhaps both used together.It should be noted, however, that <strong>in</strong> same <strong>in</strong>stances, the presence or absence of mottl<strong>in</strong>g causedby diffraction has been used as a rough <strong>in</strong>dication of gra<strong>in</strong> size and thus as a basis for theacceptance or the rejection of parts.Scatter<strong>in</strong>g In 1- And 2-Million-Volt <strong>Radiography</strong>Lead screens should always be used <strong>in</strong> this voltage range. The common thicknesses, 0.005-<strong>in</strong>chfront and 0.010-<strong>in</strong>ch back, are both satisfactory and convenient. Some users, however, f<strong>in</strong>d a<strong>Radiography</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>Modern</strong> <strong>Industry</strong> 58
0.010-<strong>in</strong>ch front screen of value because of its greater selective absorption of the scatteredradiation from the specimen.Filtration at the tube offers no improvement <strong>in</strong> radiographic quality. However, filters at the filmimprove the radiograph <strong>in</strong> the exam<strong>in</strong>ation of uniform sections, but give poor quality at the edgesof the image of a specimen because of the undercut of scattered radiation from the filter itself.Hence, filtration should not be used <strong>in</strong> the radiography of specimens conta<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g narrow bars, forexample, no matter what the thickness of the bars <strong>in</strong> the direction of the primary radiation.Further, filtration should be used only where the film can be adequately protected aga<strong>in</strong>stbackscattered radiation.Lead filters are most convenient for this voltage range. When thus used between specimen andfilm, filters are subject to mechanical damage. Care should be taken to reduce this to a m<strong>in</strong>imum,lest filter defects be confused with structures <strong>in</strong> or on the specimen. In radiography with millionvoltx-rays, specimens of uniform sections may be conveniently divided <strong>in</strong>to three classes. Belowabout 11/2 <strong>in</strong>ches of steel, filtration affords little improvement <strong>in</strong> radiographic quality. Between11/2 and 4 <strong>in</strong>ches of steel, the thickest filter, up to 1/8-<strong>in</strong>ch lead, which at the same time allows areasonable exposure time, may be used. Above 4 <strong>in</strong>ches of steel, filter thicknesses may be<strong>in</strong>creased to1/4 <strong>in</strong>ch of lead, economic considerations permitt<strong>in</strong>g. It should be noted that <strong>in</strong> theradiography of extremely thick specimens with million-volt x-rays, fluorescent screens (See"Fluorescent Screens") may be used to <strong>in</strong>crease the photographic speed to a po<strong>in</strong>t where filterscan be used without requir<strong>in</strong>g excessive exposure time.A very important po<strong>in</strong>t is to block off all radiation except the useful beam with heavy (1/2-<strong>in</strong>ch to1-<strong>in</strong>ch) lead at the anode. Unless this is done, radiation strik<strong>in</strong>g the walls of the x-ray room willscatter back <strong>in</strong> such quantity as to seriously affect the quality of the radiograph. This will beespecially noticeable if the specimen is thick or has parts project<strong>in</strong>g relatively far from the film.Multimillion-Volt <strong>Radiography</strong>Techniques of radiography <strong>in</strong> the 6- to 24-million-volt range are difficult to specify. This is <strong>in</strong> partbecause of the wide range of subjects radiographed, from thick steel to several feet of mixtures ofsolid organic compounds, and <strong>in</strong> part because the sheer size of the specimens and the difficulty<strong>in</strong> handl<strong>in</strong>g them often impose limitations on the radiographic techniques that can be used.In general, the speed of the film-screen comb<strong>in</strong>ation <strong>in</strong>creases with <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>g thickness of frontand back lead screens up to at least 0.030 <strong>in</strong>ch. One problem encountered with screens of suchgreat thickness is that of screen contact. For example, if a conventional cardboard exposureholder is supported vertically, one or both of the heavy screens may tend to sag away from thefilm, with a result<strong>in</strong>g degradation of the image quality. Vacuum cassettes are especially useful <strong>in</strong>this application and several devices have been constructed for the purpose, some of which<strong>in</strong>corporate such ref<strong>in</strong>ements as automatic preprogrammed position<strong>in</strong>g of the film beh<strong>in</strong>d thevarious areas of a large specimen.The electrons liberated <strong>in</strong> lead by the absorption of multimegavolt x-radiation are very energetic.This means that those aris<strong>in</strong>g from fairly deep with<strong>in</strong> a lead screen can penetrate the lead, be<strong>in</strong>gscattered as they go, and reach the film. Thus, when thick screens are used, the electronsreach<strong>in</strong>g the film are "diffused," with a resultant deleterious effect on image quality. Therefore,when the highest quality is required <strong>in</strong> multimillion-volt radiography, a comparatively th<strong>in</strong> frontscreen (about 0.005 <strong>in</strong>ch) is used, and the back screen is elim<strong>in</strong>ated. This necessitates aconsiderable <strong>in</strong>crease <strong>in</strong> exposure time. Naturally, the applicability of the technique depends alsoon the amount of backscattered radiation <strong>in</strong>volved and is probably not applicable where largeamounts occur.<strong>Radiography</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>Modern</strong> <strong>Industry</strong> 59
- Page 1 and 2:
RadiographyinModernIndustry
- Page 3 and 4:
RadiographyinModernIndustryFOURTH E
- Page 5 and 6:
ContentsIntroduction...............
- Page 7 and 8: Chapter 1: The Radiographic Process
- Page 9 and 10: Intensifying ScreensX-ray and other
- Page 11 and 12: makes it a very suitable material f
- Page 13 and 14: Figure 6: Typical voltage waveforms
- Page 15 and 16: Table I - Typical X-ray Machines an
- Page 17 and 18: The wavelengths (or energies of rad
- Page 19 and 20: Table III - Industrial Gamma-Ray So
- Page 21 and 22: 1. The source of light should be sm
- Page 23 and 24: B and H in the Figure 13 show the e
- Page 25 and 26: Figure 14: Geometric construction f
- Page 27 and 28: Figure 17: Pinhole pictures of the
- Page 29 and 30: The kilovoltage applied to the x-ra
- Page 31 and 32: Figure 21: Schematic diagram of som
- Page 33 and 34: kind of material radiographed, the
- Page 35 and 36: instance, the kilovoltage may be fi
- Page 37 and 38: The technique need not be limited t
- Page 39 and 40: Chapter 5: Radiographic ScreensWhen
- Page 41 and 42: Contact between the film and the le
- Page 43 and 44: Figure 29: The number of electrons
- Page 45 and 46: lead foil screens ran be retained w
- Page 47 and 48: Figure 33: The sharpness of the rad
- Page 49 and 50: Figure 34: Low density (right) is a
- Page 51 and 52: such as a wall or floor, on the fil
- Page 53 and 54: from this source. Since scatter als
- Page 55 and 56: A filter reduces excessive subject
- Page 57: Definite rules as to filter thickne
- Page 61 and 62: Example: Suppose that with a given
- Page 63 and 64: If the milliamperage remains consta
- Page 65 and 66: espectively. In other words, a cons
- Page 67 and 68: Any given exposure chart applies to
- Page 69 and 70: Figure 46: Typical gamma-ray exposu
- Page 71 and 72: where the slope of the characterist
- Page 73 and 74: Figure 49: Characteristic curves of
- Page 75 and 76: Figure 51: Characteristic curve of
- Page 77 and 78: Nomogram MethodsIn Figure 54, the s
- Page 79 and 80: Figure 56: Transparent overlay posi
- Page 81 and 82: Figure 58: Overlay positioned so as
- Page 83 and 84: The problem of radiographing a part
- Page 85 and 86: Figure 62: System of lines drawn on
- Page 87 and 88: Chapter 8: Radiographic Image Quali
- Page 89 and 90: Film contrast refers to the slope (
- Page 91 and 92: Hole Type PenetrametersThe common p
- Page 93 and 94: of the same thickness as the specim
- Page 95 and 96: Chapter 9: Industrial X-ray FilmsMo
- Page 97 and 98: Figure 70 indicates the direction t
- Page 99 and 100: the lead letters on a radiation-abs
- Page 101 and 102: Therefore, protection requirements
- Page 103 and 104: 5. Avoid pressure damage caused by
- Page 105 and 106: Paddles or plunger-type agitators a
- Page 107 and 108: slow, and the development time reco
- Page 109 and 110:
ubbles make their way to the surfac
- Page 111 and 112:
When development is complete, the f
- Page 113 and 114:
soften considerably with prolonged
- Page 115 and 116:
Figure 77: The roller transport sys
- Page 117 and 118:
Rapid Access to Processed Radiograp
- Page 119 and 120:
Figure 78: Film-feeding procedures
- Page 121 and 122:
Chapter 11: Process ControlUsers of
- Page 123 and 124:
3. Age of the developer replenisher
- Page 125 and 126:
Figure 80: Control chart below for
- Page 127 and 128:
DiscussionDensitometric data and pr
- Page 129 and 130:
Figure 82: Plan of a manual x-ray p
- Page 131 and 132:
Figure 83: A schematic diagram of a
- Page 133 and 134:
loading-bench activities are carrie
- Page 135 and 136:
KODAK Quinone-Thiosulfate Intensifi
- Page 137 and 138:
Methylene-Blue MethodTwo variations
- Page 139 and 140:
KODAK Hypo Test Solution HT-2Avoird
- Page 141 and 142:
In summary, use of the test papers
- Page 143 and 144:
narrow angle would be very thick, e
- Page 145 and 146:
When radiation passes through a spe
- Page 147 and 148:
Figure 89: Demonstration of the eff
- Page 149 and 150:
Figure 90: The amount of gamma radi
- Page 151 and 152:
The radiograph exposed in the right
- Page 153 and 154:
To illustrate, let us assume that t
- Page 155 and 156:
Figure 95: High-speed x-ray picture
- Page 157 and 158:
Figure 97: Two methods of neutron r
- Page 159 and 160:
Duplicating RadiographsSimultaneous
- Page 161 and 162:
Sometimes, as when sets of referenc
- Page 163 and 164:
PhotofluorographyIn photofluorograp
- Page 165 and 166:
discontinuities or of segregation i
- Page 167 and 168:
from the camera or by reaching down
- Page 169 and 170:
Figure 106: Schematic diagram of th
- Page 171 and 172:
valuable technique, for instance, i
- Page 173 and 174:
The position of the spots is determ
- Page 175 and 176:
Powder Diffraction File, Internatio
- Page 177 and 178:
Processing TechniquesRadiographs on
- Page 179 and 180:
Since this formula applies only to
- Page 181 and 182:
such that it does not distort the i
- Page 183 and 184:
Figure 113: A: Representation of a
- Page 185 and 186:
Figure 115: Characteristic curve of
- Page 187 and 188:
film fairly well. If high densities
- Page 189 and 190:
Density = 1.5 Density = 2.5Film Rel
- Page 191 and 192:
In most industrial radiography, the
- Page 193 and 194:
e noted here. Although the average
- Page 195 and 196:
Chapter 17: Film Graininess; Signal
- Page 197 and 198:
The ratio of signal to noise has a
- Page 199 and 200:
Chapter 18: The Photographic Latent
- Page 201 and 202:
Thus, the change that makes an expo
- Page 203 and 204:
Figure 130: Stages in the developme
- Page 205 and 206:
electrons by successive Compton int
- Page 207 and 208:
Development is essentially a chemic
- Page 209 and 210:
Chapter 19: ProtectionOne of the mo
- Page 211 and 212:
duct is brought into the x-ray room