11.07.2015 Views

Radiography in Modern Industry - Kodak

Radiography in Modern Industry - Kodak

Radiography in Modern Industry - Kodak

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

a radiographic sensitivity level of 2-2T. The first symbol (2) <strong>in</strong>dicates that the penetrameter shallbe 2 percent of the thickness of the specimen; the second (2T) <strong>in</strong>dicates that the hole hav<strong>in</strong>g adiameter twice the penetrameter thickness shall be visible on the f<strong>in</strong>ished radiograph. The qualitylevel 2-2T is probably the one most commonly specified for rout<strong>in</strong>e radiography. However, criticalcomponents may require more rigid standards, and a level of 1-2T or 1-1T may be required. Onthe other hand, the radiography of less critical specimens may be satisfactory if a quality level of2-4T or 4-4T is achieved. The more critical the radiographic exam<strong>in</strong>ation--that is, the higher thelevel of radiographic sensitivity required--the lower the numerical designation for the quality level.Some sections of the ASME (American Society of Mechanical Eng<strong>in</strong>eers) Boiler and PressureVessel Code require a penetrameter similar <strong>in</strong> general to the ASTM penetrameter. It conta<strong>in</strong>sthree holes, one of which is 2T <strong>in</strong> diameter, where T is the penetrameter thickness. Customarily,the other two holes are 3T and 4T <strong>in</strong> diameter, but other sizes may be used. M<strong>in</strong>imum hole size is1/6 <strong>in</strong>ch. Penetrameters 0.010 <strong>in</strong>ch, and less, <strong>in</strong> thickness also conta<strong>in</strong> a slit 0.010-<strong>in</strong>ch wide and1/4 <strong>in</strong>ch long. Each is identified by a lead number designat<strong>in</strong>g the thickness <strong>in</strong> thousandths of an<strong>in</strong>ch.Equivalent Penetrameter SensitivityIdeally, the penetrameter should be made of the same material as the specimen. However, this issometimes impossible because of practical or economic difficulties. In such cases, thepenetrameter may be made of a radiographically similar material--that is, a material hav<strong>in</strong>g thesame radiographic absorption as the specimen, but one of which it is easier to makepenetrameters. Tables of radiographically equivalent materials have been published where<strong>in</strong>materials hav<strong>in</strong>g similar radiographic absorptions are arranged <strong>in</strong> groups. In addition, apenetrameter made of a particular material may be used <strong>in</strong> the radiography of materials hav<strong>in</strong>ggreater radiographic absorption. In such a case, there is a certa<strong>in</strong> penalty on the radiographictesters, because they are sett<strong>in</strong>g for themselves more rigid radiographic quality standards thanare actually required. The penalty is often outweighed, however, by avoidance of the problems ofobta<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g penetrameters of an unusual material or one of which it is difficult to makepenetrameters.In some cases, the materials <strong>in</strong>volved do not appear <strong>in</strong> published tabulations. Under thesecircumstances the comparative radiographic absorption of two materials may be determ<strong>in</strong>edexperimentally. A block of the material under test and a block of the material proposed forpenetrameters, equal <strong>in</strong> thickness to the part be<strong>in</strong>g exam<strong>in</strong>ed, can be radiographed side by sideon the same film with the technique to be used <strong>in</strong> practice. If the density under the proposedpenetrameter materials is equal to or greater than the density under the specimen material, thatproposed material is suitable for fabrication of penetrameters.In practically all cases, the penetrameter is placed on the source side of the specimen--that is, <strong>in</strong>the least advantageous geometric position. In some <strong>in</strong>stances, however, this location for thepenetrameter is not feasible. An example would be the radiography of a circumferential weld <strong>in</strong> along tubular structure, us<strong>in</strong>g a source positioned with<strong>in</strong> the tube and film on the outer surface. Insuch a case a "film-side" penetrameter must be used. Some codes specify the film-sidepenetrameter that is equivalent to the source-side penetrameter normally required. When such aspecification is not made, the required film-side penetrameter may be found experimentally. In theexample above, a short section of tube of the same dimensions and materials as the item undertest would be used to demonstrate the technique. The required penetrameter would be used onthe source side, and a range of penetrameters on the film side. If the penetrameter on the sourceside <strong>in</strong>dicated that the required radiographic sensitivity was be<strong>in</strong>g achieved, the image of thesmallest visible penetrameter hole <strong>in</strong> the film-side penetrameters would be used to determ<strong>in</strong>e thepenetrameter and the hole size to be used on the production radiograph.Sometimes the shape of the part be<strong>in</strong>g exam<strong>in</strong>ed precludes plac<strong>in</strong>g the penetrameter on the part.When this occurs, the penetrameter may be placed on a block of radiographically similar material<strong>Radiography</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>Modern</strong> <strong>Industry</strong> 92

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!