11.07.2015 Views

Radiography in Modern Industry - Kodak

Radiography in Modern Industry - Kodak

Radiography in Modern Industry - Kodak

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

k<strong>in</strong>d of material radiographed, the characteristics of the x-ray generat<strong>in</strong>g apparatus, and whetherthe film is used alone or with <strong>in</strong>tensify<strong>in</strong>g screens exert a considerable <strong>in</strong>fluence on this relation.The follow<strong>in</strong>g example illustrates this po<strong>in</strong>t:Data from a given exposure chart <strong>in</strong>dicate that radiographs of equal density can be made of 1/4-<strong>in</strong>ch steel with either of the follow<strong>in</strong>g sets of exposure conditions:80 kilovolts, 35 milliampere-m<strong>in</strong>utes120 kilovolt, 15 milliampere-m<strong>in</strong>utesThus, <strong>in</strong> this case, a 50 percent <strong>in</strong>crease <strong>in</strong> kilovoltage results <strong>in</strong> a 23-fold <strong>in</strong>crease <strong>in</strong>photographically effective x-ray <strong>in</strong>tensity.Two-<strong>in</strong>ch alum<strong>in</strong>um can also be radiographed at these two kilovoltages. Equal densities will resultwith the follow<strong>in</strong>g exposure relations:80 kilovolts, 17 milliampere-m<strong>in</strong>utes120 kilovolts, 2.4 milliampere-m<strong>in</strong>utesIn this case, the same <strong>in</strong>crease <strong>in</strong> kilovoltage results <strong>in</strong> an <strong>in</strong>crease of photographically effectivex-ray <strong>in</strong>tensity pass<strong>in</strong>g through the specimen of only seven times. Many other examples can befound to illustrate the extreme variability of the effect of kilovoltage on x-ray <strong>in</strong>tensity.Gamma-ray EquivalencyEssentially the same considerations apply to gamma-ray absorption, s<strong>in</strong>ce the radiations are ofsimilar nature. It is true that some radioactive materials used <strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong>dustrial radiography emitradiation that is monoenergetic, or almost so (for example, cobalt 60 and cesium 137). However,even with these sources, scatter<strong>in</strong>g is dependent on the size, shape, and composition of thespecimen, which prevents the laws of absorption from be<strong>in</strong>g stated exactly. For those gamma-rayemitters (for example, <strong>in</strong>dium 192) that give off a number of discrete gamma-ray wavelengthsextend<strong>in</strong>g over a wide energy range, the resemblance to the absorption of x-rays is even greater.The gamma-ray absorption of a specimen depends on its thickness, density, and composition, asdoes its x-ray absorption. However, the most commonly used gamma-ray sources emit fairlypenetrat<strong>in</strong>g radiations correspond<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> their properties to high-voltage x-radiation. The tableabove shows that the absorptions of the various materials for penetrat<strong>in</strong>g gamma rays are similarto their absorptions for high-voltage x-rays--that is, the absorptions of materials fairly closetogether <strong>in</strong> atomic number are roughly proportional to their densities. As with high-voltage x-rays,this is not true of materials, such as steel and lead, that differ widely <strong>in</strong> atomic number.Radiographic ScreensAnother factor govern<strong>in</strong>g the photographic density of the radiograph is the <strong>in</strong>tensify<strong>in</strong>g action ofthe screens used. Intensify<strong>in</strong>g screens and lead screens are fully discussed <strong>in</strong> "RadiographicScreens". It will suffice to state here that x-rays and gamma rays cause fluorescent <strong>in</strong>tensify<strong>in</strong>gscreens to emit light that may materially lessen the exposure necessary to produce a givendensity. Lead screens emit electrons under the action of x-rays and gamma rays. Thephotographic effect of these electrons may permit a shorter exposure than would be requiredwithout lead screens.<strong>Radiography</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>Modern</strong> <strong>Industry</strong> 33

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!