e considered exhausted when that number of films has been processed, or sooner if aprecipitation sludge appears. It must then be replaced, not replenished.After treatment with the Hypo Clear<strong>in</strong>g Agent, films should be washed for 5 m<strong>in</strong>utes, us<strong>in</strong>g awater flow which will give a complete change of water 4 to 8 times per hour. However, if watersupplies are severely limited, films may be washed <strong>in</strong> stand<strong>in</strong>g water, rather than runn<strong>in</strong>g water,by soak<strong>in</strong>g for 10 m<strong>in</strong>utes with occasional agitation. The water <strong>in</strong> the wash tank should bereplaced after 10 films (8 x 10-<strong>in</strong>ch) per gallon have been washed.The effectiveness of the wash<strong>in</strong>g procedure and the capacity of the Hypo Clear<strong>in</strong>g Agent bathmay be checked by test<strong>in</strong>g a processed film for fixer removal as described <strong>in</strong> the follow<strong>in</strong>gsection.Test<strong>in</strong>g For Fixer RemovalFix<strong>in</strong>g chemicals not adequately removed from films by wash<strong>in</strong>g will, over a period of time, causesta<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g of the film and fad<strong>in</strong>g of the developed image. When it is known that films must bepreserved <strong>in</strong>def<strong>in</strong>itely or when there is doubt as to the adequacy of the wash<strong>in</strong>g procedures, theamount of fix<strong>in</strong>g chemicals rema<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> the film after wash<strong>in</strong>g should be determ<strong>in</strong>ed. This can bedone <strong>in</strong> one of two ways.Archival Wash<strong>in</strong>gFilm of archival <strong>in</strong>terest--and this <strong>in</strong>cludes the majority of <strong>in</strong>dustrial radiographs for code work--should rema<strong>in</strong> unchanged for long periods of time under good storage conditions (AmericanNational Standard Practice for Storage of Processed Safety Photographic Film, PH1.43-1979.Published by American National Standards Institute, Inc., New York, NY). Archival wash<strong>in</strong>g forthis <strong>in</strong>def<strong>in</strong>ite preservation of films is def<strong>in</strong>ed by American National Standards Institute (ANSI)documents <strong>in</strong> terms of the concentration of residual thiosulfate <strong>in</strong> the film. Acceptable methods formeasurement are described <strong>in</strong> ANSI PH4.8-1971, "Methylene-Blue Method for Measur<strong>in</strong>gThiosulfate, and Silver Densitometric Method for Measur<strong>in</strong>g Residual Chemicals <strong>in</strong> Film, Platesand Papers." (Available from American National Standards Institute, Inc., 1430 Broadway, NewYork, NY 10018) The methylene-blue method described <strong>in</strong> this document measures directly theconcentration of thiosulfate iron. The silver-densitometric method measures thiosulfate as well asother residual chemicals and requires that a calibration curve be used relat<strong>in</strong>g the silver densityproduced to the thiosulfate content as measured by the methylene-blue method.For test films or any other films <strong>in</strong>tended for archival keep<strong>in</strong>g, the method for determ<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g residualthiosulfate should be chosen from those covered <strong>in</strong> the ANSI standard mentioned above. Notethat while KODAK Hypo Estimator and KODAK Hypo Test Solution HT-2 (the HT-2 test) provide aquick, convenient means for estimat<strong>in</strong>g the amount of hypo (thiosulfate ion) reta<strong>in</strong>ed <strong>in</strong> theemulsion, they cannot be used to determ<strong>in</strong>e the concentration of residual thiosulfate <strong>in</strong> terms ofarchival wash<strong>in</strong>g standards.The methylene-blue method measures only thiosulfate. The technique is complex, and thesample must be tested with<strong>in</strong> two weeks of process<strong>in</strong>g. The silver densitometric methodmeasures thiosulfate and other residual chemicals. The technique is simpler, and the results arenot affected as much by the length of time between process<strong>in</strong>g and test<strong>in</strong>g. Like the HT-2 test,the silver densitometric method lacks sensitivity at low levels of thiosulfate. It is not sensitiveenough to measure thiosulfate reliably below about 0.9 µg per square centimetre. The twoprocedures for the methylene-blue method described <strong>in</strong> ANSI PH4.8-1978 cover the range of 0.1to 45 µg of thiosulfate ion (S 2 O 3 --) per square centimetre of the test sample. This is the onlymethod ANSI considers sufficiently reliable for determ<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g such a low concentration as 0.7 µg ofthiosulfate ion per square centimetre.<strong>Radiography</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>Modern</strong> <strong>Industry</strong> 136
Methylene-Blue MethodTwo variations of this method for measur<strong>in</strong>g the concentration of residual thiosulfate aredescribed <strong>in</strong> detail <strong>in</strong> ANSI PH4.8-1978. One covers a range of 0.1 to 0.9 µg of thiosulfate ion persquare centimetre; the other, a range of 0.9 to 45 µg of thiosulfate ion per square centimetre. Ifthe film is double coated, the residual thiosulfate ion is assumed to be divided equally betweenthe two sides. Therefore, the concentration per square centimetre of emulsion is one-half of thetotal determ<strong>in</strong>ed by either variant of the methylene-blue method. The maximum permissibleconcentration of residual thiosulfate ion for coarse-gra<strong>in</strong> films, such as <strong>in</strong>dustrial x-ray films, is 3µg of thiosulfate or 2 µg of thiosulfate ion per square centimetre.Either way, test<strong>in</strong>g must be done with<strong>in</strong> two weeks of process<strong>in</strong>g. Both require several reagents,a photometer or a spectrophotometer, and a calibration curve. Tests are conducted as follows:Residual thiosulfate is extracted from a test sample and reduced to a sulfide. The sulfide reactswith test reagents to form methylene blue. The absorbance or the transmittance of the blue coloris then measured with a photometer or a spectrophotometer, and the thiosulfate level is read froma calibration curve.The methylene-blue method is a complex multi-step procedure that requires special materials andequipment and specialized analytic techniques not readily available to most <strong>in</strong>dustrialradiographers. Complete step-by-step directions for both procedures, <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g preparation of thetest sample (which must be taken from an area of m<strong>in</strong>imum density--preferably an unexposed butprocessed area), the various reagents, and the calibration curve, as well as <strong>in</strong>formation on the<strong>in</strong>terpretation of results, are given <strong>in</strong> ANSI PH4.8-1978.Removal Of One Emulsion From Double-Coated FilmIn some applications of x-rays, for example, x-ray diffraction or microradiography, it may bedesirable to avoid the parallax associated with an image on double-coated film.The emulsion can be removed from one side of a processed x-ray film by the follow<strong>in</strong>g procedure.The film is processed <strong>in</strong> the normal manner. It need not be dried unless desired. If dry, the film isfastened to a sheet of glass us<strong>in</strong>g waterproof tape, and the emulsion surface to be removed isrubbed with a cotton swab saturated with one-half normal potassium hydroxide (28 grams ofpotassium hydroxide per litre). If wet, it may be pressed firmly to a sheet of glass, and thepotassium hydroxide solution applied, care be<strong>in</strong>g taken to prevent the solution from flow<strong>in</strong>g ontothe glass plate or <strong>in</strong> any way com<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> contact with the bottom emulsion. Care must be exercisedto prevent the dry chemical or the solution from com<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> contact with the bare sk<strong>in</strong> (use rubbergloves), cloth<strong>in</strong>g, or the emulsion surface that is to be preserved. After the film has been rubbedwith the swab for about 1 m<strong>in</strong>ute, the emulsion is usually soft enough to be scraped off with asmooth, dull implement that will not scratch the film base-for example, a plastic w<strong>in</strong>dshieldscraper. After the emulsion has been removed, the film is r<strong>in</strong>sed <strong>in</strong> runn<strong>in</strong>g water, removed fromthe glass plate, and immersed <strong>in</strong> the fix<strong>in</strong>g bath for a few seconds to neutralize any rema<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>gcaustic. It is then washed for about 20 m<strong>in</strong>utes and dried, although a shorter wash<strong>in</strong>g period isacceptable if the film is not to be kept <strong>in</strong>def<strong>in</strong>itely.Alternatively, the unwanted emulsion may be covered, prior to development, with somewaterproof sheet material that will protect it from the action of the developer. The protectivematerial is removed after development but before fixation. The time of fixation should beextended, s<strong>in</strong>ce the undeveloped emulsion clears more slowly than does the developed one.Wash and dry accord<strong>in</strong>g to standard procedure.If the derived area is narrow, as <strong>in</strong> the case of a microradiograph or a powder x-ray diffractionpattern, it may be covered with a waterproof adhesive tape. It is <strong>in</strong>advisable to overlap strips of<strong>Radiography</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>Modern</strong> <strong>Industry</strong> 137
- Page 1 and 2:
RadiographyinModernIndustry
- Page 3 and 4:
RadiographyinModernIndustryFOURTH E
- Page 5 and 6:
ContentsIntroduction...............
- Page 7 and 8:
Chapter 1: The Radiographic Process
- Page 9 and 10:
Intensifying ScreensX-ray and other
- Page 11 and 12:
makes it a very suitable material f
- Page 13 and 14:
Figure 6: Typical voltage waveforms
- Page 15 and 16:
Table I - Typical X-ray Machines an
- Page 17 and 18:
The wavelengths (or energies of rad
- Page 19 and 20:
Table III - Industrial Gamma-Ray So
- Page 21 and 22:
1. The source of light should be sm
- Page 23 and 24:
B and H in the Figure 13 show the e
- Page 25 and 26:
Figure 14: Geometric construction f
- Page 27 and 28:
Figure 17: Pinhole pictures of the
- Page 29 and 30:
The kilovoltage applied to the x-ra
- Page 31 and 32:
Figure 21: Schematic diagram of som
- Page 33 and 34:
kind of material radiographed, the
- Page 35 and 36:
instance, the kilovoltage may be fi
- Page 37 and 38:
The technique need not be limited t
- Page 39 and 40:
Chapter 5: Radiographic ScreensWhen
- Page 41 and 42:
Contact between the film and the le
- Page 43 and 44:
Figure 29: The number of electrons
- Page 45 and 46:
lead foil screens ran be retained w
- Page 47 and 48:
Figure 33: The sharpness of the rad
- Page 49 and 50:
Figure 34: Low density (right) is a
- Page 51 and 52:
such as a wall or floor, on the fil
- Page 53 and 54:
from this source. Since scatter als
- Page 55 and 56:
A filter reduces excessive subject
- Page 57 and 58:
Definite rules as to filter thickne
- Page 59 and 60:
0.010-inch front screen of value be
- Page 61 and 62:
Example: Suppose that with a given
- Page 63 and 64:
If the milliamperage remains consta
- Page 65 and 66:
espectively. In other words, a cons
- Page 67 and 68:
Any given exposure chart applies to
- Page 69 and 70:
Figure 46: Typical gamma-ray exposu
- Page 71 and 72:
where the slope of the characterist
- Page 73 and 74:
Figure 49: Characteristic curves of
- Page 75 and 76:
Figure 51: Characteristic curve of
- Page 77 and 78:
Nomogram MethodsIn Figure 54, the s
- Page 79 and 80:
Figure 56: Transparent overlay posi
- Page 81 and 82:
Figure 58: Overlay positioned so as
- Page 83 and 84:
The problem of radiographing a part
- Page 85 and 86: Figure 62: System of lines drawn on
- Page 87 and 88: Chapter 8: Radiographic Image Quali
- Page 89 and 90: Film contrast refers to the slope (
- Page 91 and 92: Hole Type PenetrametersThe common p
- Page 93 and 94: of the same thickness as the specim
- Page 95 and 96: Chapter 9: Industrial X-ray FilmsMo
- Page 97 and 98: Figure 70 indicates the direction t
- Page 99 and 100: the lead letters on a radiation-abs
- Page 101 and 102: Therefore, protection requirements
- Page 103 and 104: 5. Avoid pressure damage caused by
- Page 105 and 106: Paddles or plunger-type agitators a
- Page 107 and 108: slow, and the development time reco
- Page 109 and 110: ubbles make their way to the surfac
- Page 111 and 112: When development is complete, the f
- Page 113 and 114: soften considerably with prolonged
- Page 115 and 116: Figure 77: The roller transport sys
- Page 117 and 118: Rapid Access to Processed Radiograp
- Page 119 and 120: Figure 78: Film-feeding procedures
- Page 121 and 122: Chapter 11: Process ControlUsers of
- Page 123 and 124: 3. Age of the developer replenisher
- Page 125 and 126: Figure 80: Control chart below for
- Page 127 and 128: DiscussionDensitometric data and pr
- Page 129 and 130: Figure 82: Plan of a manual x-ray p
- Page 131 and 132: Figure 83: A schematic diagram of a
- Page 133 and 134: loading-bench activities are carrie
- Page 135: KODAK Quinone-Thiosulfate Intensifi
- Page 139 and 140: KODAK Hypo Test Solution HT-2Avoird
- Page 141 and 142: In summary, use of the test papers
- Page 143 and 144: narrow angle would be very thick, e
- Page 145 and 146: When radiation passes through a spe
- Page 147 and 148: Figure 89: Demonstration of the eff
- Page 149 and 150: Figure 90: The amount of gamma radi
- Page 151 and 152: The radiograph exposed in the right
- Page 153 and 154: To illustrate, let us assume that t
- Page 155 and 156: Figure 95: High-speed x-ray picture
- Page 157 and 158: Figure 97: Two methods of neutron r
- Page 159 and 160: Duplicating RadiographsSimultaneous
- Page 161 and 162: Sometimes, as when sets of referenc
- Page 163 and 164: PhotofluorographyIn photofluorograp
- Page 165 and 166: discontinuities or of segregation i
- Page 167 and 168: from the camera or by reaching down
- Page 169 and 170: Figure 106: Schematic diagram of th
- Page 171 and 172: valuable technique, for instance, i
- Page 173 and 174: The position of the spots is determ
- Page 175 and 176: Powder Diffraction File, Internatio
- Page 177 and 178: Processing TechniquesRadiographs on
- Page 179 and 180: Since this formula applies only to
- Page 181 and 182: such that it does not distort the i
- Page 183 and 184: Figure 113: A: Representation of a
- Page 185 and 186: Figure 115: Characteristic curve of
- Page 187 and 188:
film fairly well. If high densities
- Page 189 and 190:
Density = 1.5 Density = 2.5Film Rel
- Page 191 and 192:
In most industrial radiography, the
- Page 193 and 194:
e noted here. Although the average
- Page 195 and 196:
Chapter 17: Film Graininess; Signal
- Page 197 and 198:
The ratio of signal to noise has a
- Page 199 and 200:
Chapter 18: The Photographic Latent
- Page 201 and 202:
Thus, the change that makes an expo
- Page 203 and 204:
Figure 130: Stages in the developme
- Page 205 and 206:
electrons by successive Compton int
- Page 207 and 208:
Development is essentially a chemic
- Page 209 and 210:
Chapter 19: ProtectionOne of the mo
- Page 211 and 212:
duct is brought into the x-ray room