11.07.2015 Views

Annual report 2010 - Dexia.com

Annual report 2010 - Dexia.com

Annual report 2010 - Dexia.com

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Risk managementManagement <strong>report</strong>Consolidatedfinancial statementsAdditional information <strong>Annual</strong> financial statementsshare-lease products should be taken into account whencalculating damages and legal interest to be reimbursed is tobe calculated from the termination date of a contract.Shortly after the judgements of the Amsterdam Court ofAppeal were passed, cassation appeal against two of thosejudgements was filed by clients of the <strong>com</strong>pany and is stillpending. The judgements of the Netherlands Supreme Courtin these cases are expected by the end of the second quarterof 2011.The out<strong>com</strong>e of the judgement of the Amsterdam Court ofAppeal forms the basis of the out-of-court settlement attemptsby the Company (hereafter called the “Court model”).Spousal consent casesUnlike the situation with regard to disputes with clients aboutduty of care issues, the situation with regard to “spousalconsent” cases is less clear. On 28 March 2008 the NetherlandsSupreme Court ruled by judgement that article 1:88 of theDutch Civil Code is applicable to share-lease contracts. Theapplicability of this article means that the written consent ofthe spouse (or registered partner) of the lessee was necessaryto enter into the lease contract, in the absence of which thespouse is permitted to annul the contract, meaning that allpayments made under the contract should be reimbursedand any existing debt towards the Company resulting fromthe contract is extinguished. It has been well established injurisprudence that the spouse or partner should annul thecontract within three years after be<strong>com</strong>ing aware of theexistence of the contract. However, controversial questionsremain concerning the nature of the evidence required todemonstrate the knowledge of the spouse.Number of court casesOn 31 December <strong>2010</strong>, the Company is still involved in about2,000 civil court cases (<strong>com</strong>pared to over 3,400 at the end of2009). However, the vast majority of these court cases havebeen suspended. The vast majority of clients in proceedings(and especially those clients with <strong>com</strong>plaints about breach ofthe duty of care) were offered out-of-court settlements onthe basis of the so-called “Court model” during <strong>2010</strong>. Thenumber of clients in proceedings will decrease sharply in 2011because of settlements expected after the judgements of theSupreme Court and the Amsterdam Court of Appeal.Proceedings related to “spousal cases” are still ongoing dueto the interpretation issues.Litigations in generalA number of disputes have arisen between the Company andits clients with respect to share-leasing products. Particularlywith regard to the nature of these disputes, <strong>Dexia</strong> refers toits earlier <strong>report</strong>s and quarterly activity <strong>report</strong>s. Generallyspeaking, only the approximately 19,000 clients that have fileda so-called opt-out statement before 1 August 2007, and didnot enter into any settlement since then, are entitled to startor continue proceedings against the Company. However, morethan 1,800 cases have already been closed due to settlementswith the Company or the closure of proceedings.Klachteninstituut Financiële Dienstverlening(KiFiD)At the end of <strong>2010</strong>, three share-lease related cases werestill under consideration by the Klachteninstituut FinanciëleDienstverlening (KiFiD), the Complaints Institute for FinancialServices.Provisions as at 31 December <strong>2010</strong>Provisions are updated every quarter and may be influencedby fluctuations in the value of the underlying equity portfoliosof the share-leasing contracts, by client behaviour and byfuture judgements. At the end of <strong>2010</strong> the provisioningmodel was adapted to the most recent information aboutclient behaviour as well as the most recent information aboutthe effect of the “Court model”. The net financial impactthereof on <strong>Dexia</strong>’s <strong>2010</strong> financial statements was negligible.At the end of December <strong>2010</strong>, total provisions amounted toEUR 177.5 million.Lernout & Hauspie<strong>Dexia</strong> Bank Belgium (<strong>Dexia</strong> Bank) was involved in various waysin the bankruptcy of Lernout & Hauspie Speech Products SA(LHSP) and the consequences thereof. This was described indetail in the 2007, 2008 and 2009 annual <strong>report</strong>s.The following important developments have taken place sincethe 2009 annual <strong>report</strong>.Claim on Lernout & Hauspie Speech ProductsAt 31 December <strong>2010</strong>, <strong>Dexia</strong> Bank has a claim in USDchargeable to the bankruptcy of LHSP for a principal sum ofEUR 29.3 million (exchange rate USD/EUR 1.3399), for whichan impairment of EUR 25.1 million has been booked. Thisclaim originates in the share taken by the former ArtesiaBanking Corporation (ABC) in the syndicated loan of USD 430million to LHSP on 5 May 2000. ABC’s share amounted toUSD 50 million.<strong>Dexia</strong> Bank believes it will be able to recover the netaccounting value of this claim.The liquidation of LHSP’s assets is subject to separateproceedings in Belgium and in the United States.According to the LHSP Belgian bankruptcy receivers, <strong>Dexia</strong>Bank and the other unsecured creditors are unlikely to receiveany reimbursement from the Belgian liquidation of LHSP.In 2008, <strong>Dexia</strong> Bank waived its claim on the insolvency ofLHSP in the United States, in exchange for a waiver by theAmerican Litigation Trustee of LHSP of all its claims enteredagainst <strong>Dexia</strong> Bank.Prosecution of <strong>Dexia</strong> Bank in BelgiumOn 4 May 2007, <strong>Dexia</strong> Bank was summoned, together with20 other parties, to appear before the Court of Appeal inGhent. According to the writ of summons, <strong>Dexia</strong> Bank wasprosecuted by virtue of the former ABC being accused asan alleged accessory to the falsification of the financialstatements of LHSP and other related offences among whichforgery, securities fraud and market manipulation.90 <strong>Dexia</strong> <strong>Annual</strong> <strong>report</strong> <strong>2010</strong>

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!