12.07.2015 Views

Fraser River sockeye salmon: data synthesis and cumulative impacts

Fraser River sockeye salmon: data synthesis and cumulative impacts

Fraser River sockeye salmon: data synthesis and cumulative impacts

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

dependence is unlikely to have been a primary factor causing productivity declines (discussed insection 4.2 for life stage 1) reflects the net effect across all life history stages.While the timing of en-route mortality coincides generally with the <strong>Fraser</strong> <strong>sockeye</strong> situation,the <strong>Fraser</strong> <strong>sockeye</strong> productivity indices already account for en-route mortality (i.e., recruits =spawners + harvest + en-route mortality). The only possible effect on productivity indices worthexploring are inter-generational effects, for which the evidence is limited <strong>and</strong> equivocal. Wetherefore conclude that it is unlikely that en-route mortality or pre-spawn mortality are a primaryfactor in declining indices of <strong>Fraser</strong> <strong>sockeye</strong> productivity. However, en-route mortality hasdefinitely had a significant impact on the <strong>sockeye</strong> fishery <strong>and</strong> the numbers of adult fish reachingthe spawning ground, particularly for the Early <strong>and</strong> Late runs. Pre-spawn mortality, habitat,<strong>and</strong> contaminants are unlikely to be responsible for the overall pattern of declining <strong>sockeye</strong>productivity; no conclusion is possible regarding pathogens due to insufficient <strong>data</strong>. None of thefactors assessed for this life history stage are likely to have shown significant changes between2009 <strong>and</strong> 2010.Table 4.6-1. Evaluation of the relative likelihood that potential stressors encountered by <strong>Fraser</strong> <strong>River</strong> <strong>sockeye</strong><strong>salmon</strong> from the time returning adults enter the <strong>Fraser</strong> Estuary to when they spawn (Stage 5) havecontributed to the overall decline of the population in recent decades. Since various habitat measures areidentical to Table 4.3-1, they have been grouped together. Correlation/consistency column includes 3different sets of measures of impact on the <strong>Fraser</strong> <strong>sockeye</strong> fishery: a) life cycle <strong>and</strong> post-juvenileproductivity indices; b) harvest; <strong>and</strong> c) escapement.Factor Mechanism Exposure Correlation/Consistency Other LikelihoodEvidenceHabitat d Yes Yes No No UnlikelyContaminants Yes Yes No Yes UnlikelyPathogens Yes Few <strong>data</strong> Not done Yes NoconclusionpossibleClimatechange,Yes Yes Yes b,cn.a. aYesNoDefinitely b,cUnlikely atemperatures& en-routemortalityPre-spawnmortalityYes Yes No a, b,c (only increased inLate run)Mixed Unlikely b,cUnlikely aa life cycle <strong>and</strong> post-juvenile productivity indices already incorporate en-route mortality, so correlations are notapplicable. Available (limited) <strong>data</strong> does not show that en-route stress has intergenerational effects.bharvestc escapementdHabitat row includes evidence from both Technical Report 3, discussing all <strong>Fraser</strong> <strong>sockeye</strong> conservation units(Nelitz et al. 2011) <strong>and</strong> Technical Report 12 (Johannes et al. 2011) discussing the Lower <strong>Fraser</strong>. This rowsummarizes all of the rows reported in Table 4.3-1.86

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!