12.07.2015 Views

Fraser River sockeye salmon: data synthesis and cumulative impacts

Fraser River sockeye salmon: data synthesis and cumulative impacts

Fraser River sockeye salmon: data synthesis and cumulative impacts

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

o In some cases it may be the timing rather than the size of a variable that is driving<strong>sockeye</strong> productivity. It would be a good idea to consider generating indices that reflectthis hypothesis or to evaluate timing through functional <strong>data</strong> analysis. For example,perhaps it is the timing of the plankton bloom rather than the magnitude of it that is mostimportant.Additional approaches / next stepsBayesian analytical approachParameter estimation, as described earlier, involves finding the parameter values for a givenmodel that best fit the observed <strong>data</strong>. Bayesian approaches allow the parameters to be describedwith a distribution rather than assuming they have a single true underlying value, which is theclassical or frequentist approach. These methods directly quantify uncertainty <strong>and</strong> are able toh<strong>and</strong>le very complex problems (Gelman et al. 2004) making them a natural next step to thetraditional regression analyses presented here. Hilborne <strong>and</strong> Walters (1992) specificallyrecommend Bayesian methods for fisheries <strong>data</strong> as a strategy for coping with heterogeneous <strong>data</strong>(i.e., <strong>data</strong> from different sources <strong>and</strong> potentially differing quality). While we have explicitlyconsidered model uncertainty (i.e., we have not assumed that one ‘true’ underlying model <strong>and</strong> setof parameter estimates exists) by looking at the relative weights of different c<strong>and</strong>idate models,the Bayesian approach would extend that concept even further.Functional <strong>data</strong> analysisFunctional regression analysis differs from classical regression (used in this report) in that theregression coefficient is actually a function. In classical regression the covariates <strong>and</strong> theresponse variable have the same dimension. That is, if there is one productivity measure per year,then we need a corresponding <strong>data</strong> point for each covariate of interest. In reality many physicalcovariates such as: sea surface temperature or river discharge, are measured on a much finertemporal scale. Functional <strong>data</strong> analysis (FDA) enables the covariate to be incorporated at a finerscale by letting the parameter (i.e., regression coefficient) be a function rather than a fixed value.This approach may enable us to improve the ‘<strong>data</strong> reduction’ step described above as it will helpus to underst<strong>and</strong> the behaviour of the covariate over time <strong>and</strong> hopefully better capture theunderlying behaviour that relates to the response variable. Ainsworth <strong>and</strong> Routledge (2011)describe how FDA may be applied for this specific purpose. However, they point out that expertbiological/system knowledge was still critical to the application.224

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!