12.07.2015 Views

Fraser River sockeye salmon: data synthesis and cumulative impacts

Fraser River sockeye salmon: data synthesis and cumulative impacts

Fraser River sockeye salmon: data synthesis and cumulative impacts

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Figure A3.5-1. Flow diagram used to assign the relative likelihood that a particular factor has made a substantialcontribution to the decline of <strong>Fraser</strong> <strong>River</strong> <strong>sockeye</strong> <strong>salmon</strong>, based on the answers to the questions used tochallenge the available evidence. This structure is adapted from Burkhardt-Holm <strong>and</strong> Scheurer (2007,Figure 1).Because this method is an inherently retrospective form of analysis, the results cannot be used topredict the <strong>impacts</strong> that these factors may have in the future. Both Forbes <strong>and</strong> Callow (2002) <strong>and</strong>Burkhardt-Holm <strong>and</strong> Scheurer (2007) emphasize that it is unrealistic to expect these methods tobe definitive in terms of ascribing causation. While such an approach may be able to explainretrospectively which factors most likely contributed to past patterns of change in productivity,the importance of particular factors may be more or less important in the future <strong>and</strong> will varywithin any given year in both magnitude <strong>and</strong> relative importance. Even if we had complete <strong>data</strong>on all of the factors potentially affecting <strong>sockeye</strong> over the entire period of record for the stockproductivity <strong>data</strong>, we would not be able to predict in advance how these factors will combine inthe future to affect productivity.200

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!