12.07.2015 Views

Fraser River sockeye salmon: data synthesis and cumulative impacts

Fraser River sockeye salmon: data synthesis and cumulative impacts

Fraser River sockeye salmon: data synthesis and cumulative impacts

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

will likely have a high correlation (e.g., internet usage in the City of Vancouver has likelyincreased substantially <strong>and</strong> consistently since the early 1990s, corresponding directly to theperiod over which there have been substantial declines observed in the productivity of <strong>Fraser</strong><strong>River</strong> <strong>sockeye</strong> <strong>salmon</strong>).We performed a second analysis with one additional stressor category – the abundance of pink<strong>salmon</strong> both in the Northeast Pacific <strong>and</strong> from Russia. The analysis was extended to include pink<strong>salmon</strong> for two reasons: 1) the PSC Report found evidence for competitive effects of pink<strong>salmon</strong> on <strong>Fraser</strong> <strong>sockeye</strong> (section 4.9 in Peterman et al., 2010); <strong>and</strong> 2) the <strong>data</strong> were madeavailable to us. The PSC report examined three potential mechanisms by which pink <strong>salmon</strong>might affect <strong>Fraser</strong> <strong>sockeye</strong>, <strong>and</strong> rejected two of these due to contradictory evidence. Theremaining hypothesis is that abundant odd-year pink <strong>salmon</strong> from Alaska <strong>and</strong> Russia competewith adult <strong>Fraser</strong> <strong>sockeye</strong> on the high seas, which is consistent with the observation that <strong>Fraser</strong><strong>sockeye</strong> spawning in odd years show poorer growth & survival than even-year <strong>Fraser</strong> <strong>sockeye</strong>.The results from this set of analyses show that the pink <strong>salmon</strong> model (M8) <strong>and</strong> the global model(M1) appear as the strongest two models. The level of support for both of these models is similarbut because they are substantially different models, the interpretation is that they providelegitimately competing models to explain the patterns observed in <strong>Fraser</strong> <strong>River</strong> <strong>sockeye</strong> <strong>salmon</strong>.The predators/alternate prey model (M5) is third, but with a lower level of support. The fact thatthe pink <strong>salmon</strong> model does well is in some ways not surprising: there is a scientificallysupported hypothesis, with good <strong>data</strong> for the attribute that the hypothesis relates to, <strong>and</strong> theconnection is specific to a life history stage.4.8 Other Potential Factors Not Included in Cohen CommissionThe projects comprising the Cohen Commission’s Scientific <strong>and</strong> Technical Research Programrepresent an extensive but not exhaustive coverage of potential factors that may have contributedto the decline of <strong>Fraser</strong> <strong>River</strong> <strong>sockeye</strong> <strong>salmon</strong>. Table 4.8-1 lists some additional theories <strong>and</strong>potential factors that have not been explicitly included within the scope of the CohenCommission technical reports, or this report. These additional, potentially contributing factorsare presented here simply to acknowledge that other theories do exist, beyond the scope of theCohen Commission <strong>and</strong> beyond the scope of the present report. The analyses conducted withinthis project do not (<strong>and</strong> could not) exhaustively represent all possible factors.99

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!